Dynamic Bracketing and Discourse Representation

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 321-365

  Visser, Albert ^a   Vermeulen, Kees ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84977832929     PISSN: 00294527     EISSN: 19390726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1040046091     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barr, M., and C. Wells, Category Theory for Computing Science, Prentice Hall, New York, 1989.
2. Groenendijk, J., and M. Stokhof, “Dynamic predicate logic,” Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 14 (1991), pp. 39-100. 1.1, 1.2, 7.
3. Heim, I., The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1982. 1.1.
4. Heim, I., “File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness,” pp. 164-189 in Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, edited by R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow, De Gruyter, Berlin, 1983. 1.1, 3.1.
5. Hofstadter, D. R., Gödel, Esher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, Basic Books, New York, 1979. 7.
6. Hollenberg, M., and C. F. M. Vermeulen, “Counting variables in a dynamic setting,” Logic Group Preprint Series LGPS-125, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, December 1994. 6.1, 7.
7. Jacobs, B. P. F., Categorical Type Theory, Ph.D. thesis, Catholic University Nijmegen, 1991. 4.
8. Kamp, H., “A theory of truth and semantic representation,” pp. 277-322 in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, edited by J. Groenendijk et al., Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 1981.
9. Kamp, H., and U. Reyle, From Discourse to Logic, vol. I, II, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993. 1.2, 7.
10. MacLane, S., Categories for the Working Mathematician, Number 5 in Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 1971.
11. Manes, E., and M. Arbib, Arrows, Structures and Functors: the Categorical Imperative, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
12. Milward, D., “Dynamics, dependency grammar and incremental interpretation,” pp. 1095-1099 in Proceedings of COLING 92, 1992.
13. Milward, D., “Dynamic dependency grammar,” Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 17 (1994), pp. 561-606.
14. Moortgat, M. J., and R. Oehrle, “Adjacency, dependency and order,” pp. 447-466 in Proceedings of 9th Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC Publications, 1994. 2.4.
15. Pratt, V., “Action logic and pure induction,” pp. 97-120 in Logics in AI — European Workshop JELIA’90, edited by J. van Eijck, Springer, Berlin, 1991.
16. Seuren, P., Discourse Semantics, Blackwell, Oxford, 1985. 7.
17. Veltman, F., “Defaults in update semantics,” pp. 28-65 in Conditionals, Defaults and Belief Revision, edited by H. Kamp, Dyana Deliverable R2.5A, Edinburgh, 1991.
18. Vermeulen, C. F. M., “Merging without mystery, variables in dynamic semantics,” forthcoming in Journal of Philosophical Logic.
19. Vermeulen, C. F. M., “Sequence semantics for dynamic predicate logic,” Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol. 2 (1993), pp. 217-254.
20. Visser, A., “Lazy and quarrelsome brackets,” Logic Group Preprint Series 82, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, November, 1992. 7.
21. Visser, A., “Actions under presuppositions,” pp. 196-233 in Logic and Information Flow, edited by J. van Eijck and A. Visser, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994.
22. Zeevat, H., “A compositional approach to DRT,” Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 12 (1991), pp. 95-131. 1.2.
23. Zeinstra, L., “Reasoning as discourse,” Master’s thesis, Philosophy Department, Utrecht University, 1990. 7.