Enrichment of OBO ontologies

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 300-315

  Bada, Michael ^a   Hunter, Lawrence ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene ontology; Ontology consistency; Ontology enrichment; Ontology integration

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; CELLS; GENES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATTERN MATCHING; SEMANTICS;

GENE ONTOLOGY; ONTOLOGY CONSISTENCY; ONTOLOGY ENRICHMENT; ONTOLOGY INTEGRATION;

ONTOLOGY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CELL TYPE; MACRONUCLEUS; METHODOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SOFTWARE; UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEM; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 34248327232     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2006.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. http://obo.sourceforge.net/main.html.
2. Ashburner M., Mungall C.J., and Lewis S.E. Ontologies for biologists: a community model for the annotation of genomic data. Proc Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol (2003) 227-236
3. Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25 (2000) 25-29
4. Ogren P.V., Cohen K.B., Acquaah-Mensah G.K., Eberlein J., and Hunter L. The compositional structure of gene ontology terms. Proc Pacific Symp Biocomput (2004) 214-225
5. Burgun A., and Bodenreider O. An ontology of chemical entities helps identify dependence relations among gene ontology terms. Proc Symp Semantic Mining Biomed (2005)
6. Wroe C.J., Stevens R.D., Goble C.A., and Ashburner M. A methodology to migrate the gene ontology to a description logic environment using DAML + OIL. Proc Pacific Symp Biocomput (2003) 624-636
7. Aranguren ME. Improving the structure of the gene ontology. Msc dissertation, Manchester, UK: University of Manchester; 2004.
8. Mungall C.J. Obol: integrating language and meaning in bio-ontologies. Comp Funct Genomic 5 (2004) 509-520
9. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/.
10. Bard J., Rhee S.Y., and Ashburner M. An ontology for cell types. Genome Biol 6 (2005) R21
11. Noy NF, Fergerson RW, Musen MA. The knowledge model of Protégé-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. Proc Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW) 2000.
12. Lu Z, Firby J, Baumgartner Jr. WA, Cohen KB, Ogren PV, Hunter L. Ontology-driven analysis of complex relationships in biomedical text: extracting protein transport information from GeneRIFs. Submitted to Bioinformatics.
13. http://faculty.washington.edu/gennari/Protege-plugins/OBO-import/.
14. Yeh I., Karp P.D., Noy N.F., and Altman R.B. Knowledge acquisition, consistency checking and concurrency control for gene ontology (GO). Bioinformatics 19 2 (2003) 241-248
15. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.
16. Bada M., Turi D., McEntire R., and Stevens R. Using reasoning to guide annotation with gene ontology terms in GOAT. SIGMOD Record 33 2 (2004) 27-32
17. Bodenreider O., Aubry M., and Burgun A. Non-lexical approaches to identifying associative relations in the gene ontology. Proc Pacific Symp Biocomput (2005) 91-102
18. Kumar A., Smith B., and Borgelt C. Dependence relationships between gene ontology terms based on TIGR gene product annotations. Proc ComputTerm (2004) 31-38
19. Johnson H.L., Cohen K.B., Baumgartner Jr. W.A., Lu Z., Bada M., Kester T., et al. Evaluation of lexical methods for detecting relationships between concepts from multiple ontologies. Proc Pacific Symp Biocomput (2006) 28-39