Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1142-1151

  Tilney, Henry S ^a   Sains, Parvinder S ^a   Lovegrove, Richard E ^a   Reese, George E ^a   Heriot, Alexander G ^a   Tekkis, Paris P ^a,b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COLOSTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; EMBASE; ENTEROCUTANEOUS FISTULA; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; ILEUS; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTESTINE FISTULA; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDLINE; OVID; RISK; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEPSIS; SKIN IRRITATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STOMA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND INFECTION;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; COLON; COLOSTOMY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; RECTUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34248233678     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0218-y     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, et al. Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1998;85:1114-1117.
2. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:355-358.
3. Carlsen E, Schlichting E, Guldvog I, et al. Effect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:526-529.
4. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ, et al. Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991;78:196-198.
5. Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Eur J Surg 1994;160:293-297.
6. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:211-216.
7. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:653-660.
8. Wong NY, Eu KW. A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2076-2079.
9. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, et al. Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:650-655.
10. Lertsithichai P, Rattanapichart P. Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications. Asian J Surg 2004;27:202- 210discussion 211-202.
11. Clarke M, Horton R. Bringing it all together: Lancet-Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. Lancet 2001;357:1728.
12. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-2012.
13. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188.
14. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634.
15. Haldane JB. The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies. Ann Hum Genet 1956;20:309-311.
16. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, et al. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985;27:335-371.
17. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-748.
18. Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:745-753.
19. Egger M, Smith GD. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 1995;311:753-754.
20. Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, et al. De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 1986;73:566-570.
21. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, et al. Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:76-79.
22. Chen F, Stuart M. The morbidity of defunctioning stomata. Aust N Z J Surg 1996;66:218-221.
23. Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, et al. Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study. Arch Surg 2001;136:338-342.
24. Fasth S, Hulten L, Palselius I. Loop ileostomy - an attractive alternative to a temporary transverse colostomy. Acta Chir Scand 1980;146:203-207.
25. Nordstrom G, Hulten L. Loop ileostomy as an alternative to transverse loop colostomy. J Enterostomal Ther 1983;10:92-94.
26. Rutegard J, Dahlgren S. Transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy as diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Scand 1987;153:229-232.
27. Khoury GA, Lewis MC, Meleagros L, et al. Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomised trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1987;69:5-7.
28. Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, et al. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 2001;25:274-277.
29. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, et al. Use of ileostomy and colostomy as temporal derivation in colorectal surgery. G Chir 2002;23:48-52.
30. Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2002;89:704-708.
31. Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, et al. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2005;92:1137-1142.
32. Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, et al. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2001;88:360-363.
33. Ricketts RR, Pettitt BJ. Management of Hirschsprung's disease in adolescents. Am Surg 1989;55:219-225.
34. Branagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1021-1026.
35. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, et al. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2004;240:255-259.
36. Tang CL, Seow-Choen F, Fook-Chong S, et al. Bioresorbable adhesion barrier facilitates early closure of the defunctioning ileostomy after rectal excision: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1200-1207.
37. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, et al. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1569-1574.
38. Amin AI, Ramalingam T, Sexton R, et al. Comparison of transanal stent with defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2003;90:581-582.
39. Patrascu T, Doran H, Musat O. Protective transanal tube in colo-rectal anastomosis. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2004;99:75-78.
40. Tschmelitsch J, Wykypiel H, Prommegger R, et al. Colostomy vs tube cecostomy for protection of a low anastomosis in rectal cancer. Arch Surg 1999;134:1385-1388.
41. Thomson WH, White S, O'Leary DP. Tube caecostomy to protect rectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1998;85:1533-1534.