Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: A meta-analysis of complications

Asian Journal of Surgery

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 202-210

  Lertsithichai, Panuwat ^a   Rattanapichart, Pudsaporn ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPORT; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLOSTOMY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STOMA; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL WOUND; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 4143140784     PISSN: 10159584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60033-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2002;89:704-8.
2. Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, et al. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2001;88:360-3.
3. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, et al. Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:76-9.
4. Khoury GA, Lewis MC, Meleagros L, et al. Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomized trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1987;69:5-7.
5. Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, et al. Defunctioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 1986;73:566-70.
6. Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, et al. Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study. Arch Surg 2001; 136:338-42.
7. Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, et al. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomosis during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 2001;25:274-8.
8. Fasth S, Hulten L, Palselius I. Loop ileostomy - an attractive alternative to temporary transverse colostomy. Acta Chir Scand 1980;146: 203-7.
9. Kohler A, Athanasiadis S, Nafe M. Postoperative results of colostomy and ileostomy closure. A retrospective analysis of three different closure techniques in 182 patients. Chirurg 1994;65:529-32. [In German]
10. Park JJ, Del Pino A, Orsay CP, et al. Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1575-80.
11. Duchesne JC, Wang YZ, Weintraub SL, et al. Stoma complications: a multivariate analysis. Am Surg 2002;68:961-6.
12. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman D, eds. Systematic Review in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context, 2nd edition. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001:285-312.
13. nd edition. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001:157-75.
14. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Smith GD. Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman D, eds. Systematic Review in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context, 2nd edition. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001:189-207.
15. nd edition. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001:347-69.
16. Pogue J, Yusuf S. Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1998;351:47-52.
17. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, et al. Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:650-5.
18. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, et al. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1569-74.