Implications for studying team cognition and team performance in network-centric warfare paradigms

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 78, Issue 5 II, 2007, Pages

  Krueger, Gerald P ^a   Banderet, Louis E ^b  

^a Wexford Group International   (United States)

^b U S ARMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral sciences measures of soldier performance; Cognitive performance metrics; Network centric warfare; Team cognition; Team performance

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; HUMAN; MILITARY PHENOMENA; MILITARY RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE; POLITICS; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOLDIER; TEAMWORK; TRAINING; WAR;

COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MILITARY MEDICINE; MILITARY PERSONNEL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; WAR;

EID: 34248230831     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Alberts DS, Garstka JI, Stein FP. Network centric warfare: developing and leveraging information superiority. Washington, DC: Command and Control Research Program (CCRP) Center for Advanced Concepts and Technology (ACT); 1999.
2. Alberts DS, Hayes, RE. Power to the edge: command, control in the information age. Washington, DC: Command and Control Research Program (CCRP) Center for Advanced Concepts and Technology (ACT); 2003.
3. Alberts DS, Hayes RE. Understanding command and control. Washington, DC: Command and Control Research Program (CCRP) Center for Advanced Concepts and Technology (ACT); 2006.
4. Banderet LE (Chairman). Embedded Metrics Focus Group Topic: strategies for embedding measures of cognitive performance into military tasks. In: CD Proceedings of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Workshop, Cognitive performance: the future force warrior in a network centric environment. 10-12 August 2004, St. Pete's Beach, FL. Available at: http://www.momrp.org/cpa1.html.
5. Banderet LE, Krueger GP (Chairmen). Cognitive Performance Metrics Focus Group Topic: issues in assessing team performance. In: CD Proceedings of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Workshop, cognitive performance: force multiplication through human in the loop augmentation. 19-21 July 2005, Las Vegas, NV. Available at: http://www. momrp.org/cpa1.html.
6. Banderet LE, Russo MB. Cognitive performance and communications in a network-centric battle laboratory. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76(7, Suppl.):C21-3.
7. Bolia RS, Nelson WT. Characterizing team performance in network-centric operations: philosophical and methodological issues. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007; 78(5, Suppl.):B000-00.
8. Cooke NJ, Salas E, Kiekel PA, Bell B. Advances in measuring team cognition. In: Salas E, Fiore SM, eds. Team cognition: understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004: 83-106.
9. Cosenzo KA, Fatkin LT, Patton DJ. Ready or not: enhancing operational effectiveness through use of readiness measures. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007; 78(5, Suppl.):B96-106.
10. Cuevas HM, Fiore SM, Caldwell BS, Strater L. Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007; 78(5, Suppl.):B63-70.
11. Fischer U, McDonnell L, Orasanu J. Linguistic correlates of team performance: toward a tool for monitoring team functioning during space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007; 78(5, Suppl.):B86-95.
12. Grossman D. On killing: the psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. New York: Back Bay Books, Little, Brown and Company; 1995.
13. Grossman D, Christensen LW. On combat: the psychology and physiology of deadly conflict in war and in peace. Nashville, TN: PPCT Research Publications; 2004.
14. Hancock PA, Warm J. A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Hum Factors 1989; 31:519-37.
15. Jean G. Armies around the globe trotting out high-tech warrior ensembles: turning man into machine. Arlington, VA: National Defense Industrial Association's Business and Technology Magazine; October 2006:30-4.
16. Krueger GP, Banderet LE (Chairmen). Common Metrics Focus Group Topic: selection of a common metric for assessing the cognitive performance of the individual warfighter. In: CD Proceedings of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Workshop, cognitive performance: the future force warrior in a network centric environment. 10-12 August 2004, St. Pete's Beach, FL. Available at: http://www.momrp.org/cpa1.html.
17. Krueger GP, Banderet LE (Chairmen). Cognitive Performance Metrics Focus Group Topic: 1. issues in assessing situational awareness, and 2. update common performance metrics. In: CD Proceedings of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Workshop, cognitive performance: force multiplication through human in the loop augmentation. 19-21 July 2005, Las Vegas, NV. Available at http://www.momrp. org/cpa1.html.
18. Krulak CC. The strategic corporal: leadership in the three block war. U.S. Marines Corps Gazette 1999; 83:18-22.
19. Martinez-Lopez L. Cognitive performance in operational environments. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76(7, Suppl.):C2-3.
20. O'Donnell RD, Moise S, Schmidt RM. Generating performance test batteries relevant to specific operational tasks. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76(7, Suppl.):C24-30.
21. Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, et al. Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments: the power of team performance diagnosis. Aviat Space Environ Med 2007; 78(5, Suppl.):B77-85.
22. Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, et al. Crew resource management training research, practice, and lessons learned. Chapter 2. In: Williges RC, ed. Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, volume 2. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2006:35-73.
23. Scales RH. Clausewitz and World War IV. Armed Forces Journal, July 2006:15-24.
24. Schoomaker PJ. Bitter lessons of unpreparedness. Army: The Magazine of the Association of the United States Army 2006; 56(10):21-6.
25. U.S. Army Combined Arms Center and U.S. Marines Corps Combat Development Command. Counterinsurgency. U.S. Army Field Manual, FM 3-24 and U.S. Marines Fleet Marine Force Manual, FMFM 3-24. Fort Leavenworth, KS: U.S. Army Combined Arms Center. December 2006; http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-24.pdf.
26. Whitmore JN. Assessing performance in complex team environments. Aviat Space Environ Med 2005; 76(7, Suppl.):C31-3.
27. Yerkes RM, Dodson JD. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. J Comp Neurol Psychol 1908; 18:459-82.