Insect natural enemies of Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytinae) in managed and unmanaged stands of mixed lowland forest in Poland

Journal of Pest Science

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 99-107

  Hilszczański, Jacek ^a   Gibb, Heloise ^b,c   Bystrowski, Cezary ^a  

^a FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bia owie a old growth mixed forest; Ips typographus; Parasitoids; Predatory beetles; Sanitary fellings

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; MIXED FOREST; NATURAL ENEMY; PARASITOID; PREDATOR;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; POLAND;

CLERIDAE; COLEOPTERA; CURCULIONIDAE; HEXAPODA; HISTERIDAE; IPS TYPOGRAPHUS; PAROMALUS; PICEA; PLEGADERUS; PTEROMALIDAE; RHOPALICUS TUTELA; ROPTROCERUS XYLOPHAGORUM; SCOLYTINAE; THANASIMUS;

EID: 34248230740     PISSN: 16124758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-006-0160-7     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baier P, Furher E, Mattanovich J, Schafellner Ch (2000) Host tree-bark beetle interactions: Effects of restoration of secondary Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forest on food quality for Ips typographus L. (Scolytidae). XXI IUFRO Conf Kuala Lumpur, vol 2, p 287
2. Bałazy S (1966) Organizmy źywe jako regulatory liczebności populacji korników w drzewostanach áwierkowych ze szczególnym uwzglȩdnieniem owadobójczych grzybów (in Polish). I Pr Kom Nauk Rol i Leśn 21:3-50
3. Burakowski B, Mroczkowski M, Stefanska J (1978) Catalogus faunae Poloniae. Part XXIII no 5. Coleoptera. Histeroidea and Staphylinoidea except Staphylinidae. PWN Warsaw (in Polish)
4. Byers JA (1995) Host tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark beetles. In: Cardes RT, Bell WJ (eds) Chemical ecology of insects, vol 2. New York, pp 154-213
5. Dippel C, Heidger C, Nicolai V, Simon M (1997) The influence of four different predators on bark beetles in European Forest ecosystems (Col., Scolytidae). Entomol Gen 27:161-175
6. Duelli P, Zahradnik P, Knizek M, Kalinova B (1997) Migration in spruce bark beetles (Ips typographus L.) and the efficiency of pheromone traps. J Appl Entomol 121:297-303
7. Erbilgin N, Raffa KF (2001) Modulation of predator attraction to pheromones of two prey species by stereochemistry of plant volatiles. Oecologia 127:444-453
8. Feicht E (2004) Parasitoids of Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae), their frequency and composition in uncontrolled and controlled infested spruce forest in Bavaria. J Pest Sci 77:165-172
9. Forsse E (1989) Migration in bark beetles with special reference to the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. Ph.D. Thesis, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Umeå, Sweden
10. Gauss R (1954) Der Ameisenbuntkafer Thanasimus (Clerus) formicarius Latr. Als Borkenkaferfeind 417-429. In: Wellenstein G (ed) Die Grosse Borkenkaferkalamitat in Sudwest-Deutschland 1944-1951. Ulm
11. Grégoire JC, Evans H (2004) Damage and control of BAWBILT organisms an overview. In: Lieutier F et al (eds) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer, Dordchet, pp 19-37
12. Grégoire JC, Warzée N (2003) Biodiversité forestière et ennemis naturels des scolytes: Le cas examplaire de Thanasimus formicarius. Forêt Wallonne 66:2-6
13. Gunn JS, Hagan JM III (2000) Woodpecker abundance and tree use in un-even aged managed, and unmanaged, forest in northern Maine. For Ecol Manage 126:1-12
14. Hedgren PO, Schroeder LM (2004) Reproductive success of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) and occurrence of associated species: A comparison between standing beetle-killed trees and cut trees. For Ecol Manag 203:241-250
15. Heidger C (1995) The importance of Thanasimus formicarius as antagonist of Ips typographus. Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Entomol 10:79-82
16. Hilszczański J, Gibb H, Hjältén J, Atlegrim O, Johansson T, Pettersson R, Ball JP, Danell K (2005) Parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonoidea) of saproxylic beetles are affected by forest successional stage and dead wood characteristics in boreal spruce forest. Biol Conserv 126:456-464
17. Instruction of Forest Protection (in Polish) (1988) PWRiL Warsaw, p 303
18. Jonsell M, Nordlander G (2002) Insects in polypore fungi as indicator species: A comparison between forest sites differing in amounts and continuity of dead wood. For Ecol Manage 157:101-118
19. Jonsell M, Nordlander G, Jonsson M (1999) Colonization patterns of insects breeding in wood-decaying fungi. J Insect Conserv 3:145-161
20. Kenis M, Wermelinger B, Grégoire J-C (2004) Research on parasitoids and predators of Scolytidae in living trees in Europe - a review. In: Lieutier F et al (eds) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer, Dorchedt, pp 237-290
21. Kruger K, Mills NJ (1990) Observations on the biology of three parasitoids of the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae): Coeloides bostrychorum, Dendrosoter middendorffii (Hym., Braconidae) and Rhopalicus tutela (Hym., Pteromalidae). J Appl Entomol 110:281-291
22. Langewald J (1989) A contribution on habitat selection in the variegated ant-beetle, Thanasimus formicarius L. (Col., Cleridae). Anz Schadlingskd Pfl 62:88-90
23. Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Kaila L, Punttila P, Rauh J (1999) Bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) and associated beetle species in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. For Ecol Manage 116:233-245
24. Mazur S (1973) Keys for determination of Polish insects. XIX Coleoptera. Part 11-12 Sphaeritidae and Histeridae. PWN Warsaw
25. Mazur S, Borowski J, Byk A, Mokrzycki T (1996) The diversity of predatory beetles complex living under spruce bark in the Białowieźa Primeval Forest. Ann Warsaw Agric Univ SGGW For Wood Technol 47:27-37
26. Mills NJ (1985) Some observations on the role of predation in the natural regulation of Ips typographus populations. Z Angew Entomol 99:209-215
27. Rice WR (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225
28. SAS Institute (2005) JMP Version 5.1. SAS Institute Inc., USA
29. Satterthwaite FE (1946) An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bull 2:110-114
30. Schlyter F, Lundgren U (1993) Distribution of bark beetles and its predators within and outside old growth forest reserves: No increase of hazard near reserves. Scand J Forest Res 8:246-256
31. Schroeder LM (1999) Prolonged development time of the bark beetle predator Thanasimus formic arius (Col.: Cleridae) in relation to its prey species Tomicus piniperda (L.) and Ips typographus (L.)(Col.: Scolytidae). Agric For Entomol 1:127-135
32. Shaw MR, Hochberg ME (2001) The neglect of parasitic Hymenoptera in insect conservation strategies: The British fauna as a prime example. J Insect Conserv 5:253-263
33. Wainhouse D, Cross DJ, Howell R (1990) The role of lignin as a defense against the spruce bark beetle Dendroctonus micans: Effect on larvae and adults. Oecologia 85:257-265
34. Wermlinger B (2004) Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus - a review of recent research. For Ecol Manage 202:67-82
35. Weslien J (1992) The arthropod complex associated with Ips typographus (L.)(CoS.: Scolytidae): species composition, phenology, and impact on bark beetle productivity. Entomol Fennica 3:205-213
36. Weslien J, Regnander J (1992) The influence of natural enemies on brood production in Ips typographus (Col.: Scolytidae) with special reference to egg-laying and predation by Thanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae). Entomophaga 37:333-342
37. Weslien J, Schroeder LM (1999) Population levels of bark beetles and associated insects in managed and unmanaged spruce stands. For Ecol Manage 115:267-275
38. Wikars LO (2003) Tragosoma depsarium (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) is temporarily favoured by clear-cuts but depends on old-growth forest. Entomol Tidsskr 124:1-12