Comparison of time domain techniques for the evaluation of the response and the stability in long span suspension bridges

Computers and Structures

Volumn 85, Issue 11-14, 2007, Pages 1032-1048

  Petrini, Francesco ^a   Giuliano, Fabio ^b   Bontempi, Franco ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aeroelastic forces; Buffeting; Flutter; Structural dynamics; Suspension bridge

Indexed keywords

BUFFETING; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; TURBULENT FLOW;

AEROELASTIC FORCES; NONTURBULENT FLOW; WIND VELOCITY;

SUSPENSION BRIDGES;

EID: 34248209176     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Theodorsen T. On the theory of wing section with particular reference to the lift distribution. NACA Report No. 383;1931.
2. Theodorsen T. Theory of wing section of arbitrary shape. NACA Report No. 411;1931.
3. Theodorsen T. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA Report No. 496;1935.
4. Caracoglia L., and Jones N.P. Time domain vs. frequency domain characterization of aeroelastic forces for bridge deck section. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91 (2003) 371-402
5. Chen X., Matsumoto M., and Kareem A. Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges. J Eng Mech January (2000) 7-16
6. Scanlan R.H., and Tomko J.J. Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivates. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 97 (1971) 1717-1737
7. Jain A., Jones N.P., and Scanlan R.H. Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges. J Struct Eng, ASCE 122 7 (1996) 716-725
8. Simiu E., and Scanlan R.H. Wind effects on structures. third ed. (1996), John Wiley e sons Inc.
9. Lazzari M. Time domain modelling of aeroelastic dridge decks: a comparative study and an application. Int J Numer Meth Eng 62 (2005) 1064-1104
10. Bruno L., and Khris S. The validity of 2D numerical simulations of vortical structures around a bridge deck. Math Comput Model 37 (2003) 795-828
11. Petrini F, Giuliano F, Bontempi F. Modeling and simulations of aerodynamic in a long span suspension bridge. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on structural safety and reliability, ICOSSAR '05, Rome, Italy, 2005. p. 83.
12. Diana G, Falco M, Bruni S, Cigada A, Collina A. Risposta di un ponte a grande luce al vento turbolento: confronto tra simulazioni numeriche e risultati sperimentali (in Italian). In: Proceedings of the third IN-VENTO congress, Rome, Italy, 1994.
13. Zasso A. Flutter derivates: advantages of a new representation convention. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 60 (1996) 35-47
14. Bontempi F. Frameworks for structural analysis. Key lecture at the tenth international conference on civil, structural and environmental engineering computing. 30 August-2 September 2005, Rome, Italy.
15. Pecora M., Lecce L., Marulo F., and Corio D.P. Aeroelastic behaviour of long span bridges with "multibox" type deck sections. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 18 (1993) 343-358
16. "Stretto di Messina S.p.A." Company, Preliminary Project, 1992, .
17. Bathe K.J. Finite element procedures (1996), Prentice-Hall
18. Bathe K.J., and Baig M.M.I. On a composite implicit time integration procedure for nonlinear dynamics. Comput Struct 83 (2005) 2513-2524
19. Bontempi F, Giuliano F. Multilevel approach for the analysis and synthesis of the serviceability performances of a long span suspension bridge. In: Proceedings of the tenth international conference on civil, structural and environmental engineering computing, 30 August-2 September 2005, Rome, Italy.
20. Carassale L., and Solari G. Monte Carlo simulation of wind velocity field on complex structures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 94 (2006) 323-339
21. Diana G., Falco M., Bruni S., Cigada A., Larose G.L., Damsgaard A., et al. Comparison between wind tunnel tests on a full aeroelastic model of the proposed bridge over Stretto di Messina and numerical results. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 54/55 (1995) 101-113