The validity of 2D numerical simulations of vortical structures around a bridge deck

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 37, Issue 7-8, 2003, Pages 795-828

  Bruno, L ^a   Khris, S ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b IMT Technop de Chateau Gombert   (France)

Author keywords

Bridge aerodynamics; Computational wind engineering; Grid based methods; Turbulence modelling; Vortex shedding

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038192250     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00087-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. G. Buresti, Vortex-shedding from bluff bodies, In Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, (Edited by Riera and Davemport), Balkema, Rotterdam, (1998).
2. H. Nakaguchi, K. Hashimoto and S. Muto, An experimental study on aerodynamic drag of rectangular cylinders, J. Japan Soc. of Aeronautical and Space Sci. 16 (168), 1-5, (1968).
3. K. Shimada and T. Ishihara Prediction of aeroelastic vibrations of rectangular cylinder by k - ε model, J. Aerospace Eng. 4 (12), 122-135, (1999).
4. A. Okajima, Flow around a rectangular cylinder with a series of various width/height ratios, J. Wind Eng. 17, 1-19, (1983).
5. N. Shiraishi and M. Matsumoto, On classification of vortex-induced oscillation and its application for bridge structures, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 14, 419-430, (1983).
6. J.H. Walter, Discrete vortex methods in bridge aerodynamics and prospects for parallel computing techniques, In Bridge Aerodynamics, (Edited by A. Larsen and S. Esdahl), pp. 301-311, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1998).
7. S. Murakami, W. Rodi, A. Mochida and S. Sakamoto, Large eddy simulation of vortex shedding flow past 2D square cylinder, J. Wind Eng. 55, 79-80, (1993).
8. T. Tamura, I. Otha and K. Kuwahara, On the reliability of two-dimensional simulation for unsteady flows around a cylinder-type structure, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 35, 275-298, (1990).
9. S. Murakami and A. Mochida, On turbulent vortex-shedding flow past 2D square cylinder predicted by CFD, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 54, 191-211, (1995).
10. B. Bienkiewicz, Wind-tunnel study of geometry modification on aerodynamics of a cable-stayed bridge deck, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 26, 325-339, (1987).
11. R.H. Scanlan, N.P. Jones, P.P. Sarkar and L. Singh, The effect of section model details on aeroelastic parameters, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 54/55, 45-53, (1995).
12. L. Bruno, S. Khris and M. Marcillat, Numerical simulation of the effect of section details and partial streamlining on the aerodynamics of a long-span bridge deck, Wind and Structures 4, 315-332, (2001).
13. A. Larsen, Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624-m suspension bridge across the Great Belt, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 48, 261-285, (1993).
14. T.A. Reinhold, M. Brinch and A. Damsgaard, Wind-tunnel tests for the Great Belt Link, In Aerodynamics of Large Bridges, (Edited by A. Larsen), pp. 255-267, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1992).
15. G.L. Larose, The response of a suspension bridge deck to the turbulent wind: The taut-strip model approach, M. Eng. Sc., The University of Western Ontario, Ontario, (1992).
16. J.B. Frandsen, Simultaneous pressures and accelerations measured full-scale on the Great Belt East suspension bridge, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 89 (1), 95-129, (2001).
17. A. Larsen and J.H. Walter, Aeroelastic analysis of bridge girder sections based on discrete vortex simulations, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 67/68, 253-265, (1997).
18. A. Larsen and S. Esdahl, Discrete vortex simulations of fluid-structure interaction in bridge engineering. In Computational Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction, (Edited by T. Kvamsdal), Tapir Forlag, Trondheim, (1999).
19. st Century, (Edited by A. Larsen et al.), pp. 1345-1352, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1999).
20. th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics & Applications, (Edited by H.J. Niemann et al.), Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, (2000).
21. S. Kuroda, Numerical simulation of flow around a box girder of a long-span suspension bridge, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 67/68, 239-252, (1997).
22. st Century, (Edited by A. Larsen et al.), pp. 1321-1327, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1999).
23. R.P. Selvam, Computational procedures in grid-based computational bridge aerodynamics, In Bridge Aerodynamics, (Edited by A. Larsen and S. Esdahl), pp. 327-336, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1998).
24. C.B. Jenssen and T. Kvamsdal, Computational methods for FSI simulations of slender bridges on high performance computers, In Computational Methods for Fluid-Structure Interaction, (Edited by T. Kvamsdal), Tapir Forlag, Trondheim, (1999).
25. st Century, (Edited by A. Larsen et al.), pp. 1265-1270, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1999).
26. M. Pecora, L. Lecce, F. Marulo and D.P. Coiro, Aeroelastic behaviour of long-span bridges with "multibox" type deck sections, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 48, 343-358, (1993).
27. st Century, (Edited by A. Larsen et al.), pp. 1277-1284, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1999).
28. T.L. Thorbek, Numerical simulations of the vortex shedding past the Great Belt East Bridge deck, Private communications, (2001).
29. T. Sarpkaya, Computational methods with vortices - The 1988 Freeman scholar lecture, ASME J. Fluids Eng. 111, 5-52, (1989).
30. S. Lee, J.S. Lee and J.D. Kim, Prediction of vortex-induced wind loading on long-span bridges, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 67/68, 267-278, (1997).
31. R. Franke and W. Rodi, Calculation of vortex shedding past a square cylinder with various turbulence models, In Proc. Eighth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, pp. 20-1-1-20-1-6, Technical University of Munich, Munich, (1991).
32. B.E. Launder and D.B. Spalding The numerical computation of turbulent flows, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 3, 269-289, (1974).
33. V. Yakhot, S.A. Orszag, S. Thangam, T.B. Gatski and G.C. Speziale, Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique, Phys. Fluids A4 (7), 1510-1520, (1992).
34. F.S. Lien and M.A. Leschziner, Assessment of turbulent transport models including nonlinear RNG eddy viscosity formulation and second-moment closure, Computers Fluids 23 (8), 983-1004, (1994).
35. M.M. Gibson and B.E. Launder, Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer, J. Fluid Mech. 86, 491-511, (1978).
36. J. Smagorinsky, General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment, Month. Weather Rev. 91, 99-164, (1963).
37. H.C. Chen and V.C. Patel, Near-wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation, AIAA Journal 26 (6), 641-648, (1988).
38. R.I. Issa, Solution of implicitly discretized fluid-flow equations by operator splitting, J. Comput. Phys. 62, 40-65, (1986).
39. R.F. Warming and R.M. Beam, Upwind second-order difference schemes and application in aerodynamic flows, AIAA Journal 9 (14), 1241-1249, (1976).
40. B.P. Leonard, A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 19, 59-98, (1979).
41. W. Shyy, S. Thakur and J. Wright, Second-order upwind and central difference schemes for recirculating flow computation, AIAA Journal 4 (30), 923-932, (1992).
42. th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Grenoble, (1997).
43. P. Diez and J.J. Egozcue, Probabilistic analysis of an a posteriori error estimator for finite elements, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 5 (11), 841-854, (2001).
44. K. Gerdes, J.M. Melenk, C. Schwab and D. Schötzau, The hp-version of the streamline diffusion finite element method in two space dimensions, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 2 (11), 301-337, (2001).