Application of Navier-Stokes simulations for aeroelastic stability assessment in transonic regime

Computers and Structures

Volumn 85, Issue 11-14, 2007, Pages 818-832

  Cavagna, Luca ^a   Quaranta, Giuseppe ^a   Mantegazza, Paolo ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aeroelasticity; Fluid structure interface; Flutter; Grid deformation; Navier Stokes equations; ROMs; Transonic regime

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EULER EQUATIONS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

GRID DEFORMATION; REDUCED ORDER MODELS (ROM); TRANSONIC REGIME;

TRANSONIC AERODYNAMICS;

EID: 34248208696     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Isogai K. On the transonic-dip mechanism of flutter of a sweptback wing. AIAA J 17 (1979) 735-795
2. Schuster D.M., Liu D.D., and Huttsell L.J. Computational aeroelasticity: success, progress, challenge. J Aircraft 40 5 (2003) 843-856
3. Yurkovich R. Status of unsteady aerodynamic prediction for flutter of high-performance aircraft. J Aircraft 40 5 (2003) 832-842
4. Lee-Raush EM, Batina JT, Wing flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method. AIAA Paper 93-1422, April; 1993.
5. Bennet RM, Edwards JW. An overview of recent developments in computational aeroelasticity. In: Proceedings of the 29th AIAA fluid dynamics conference, Albuquerque, NM; 1998.
6. Kamakoti R., and Shyy W. Fluid-structure interaction for aeroelastic applications. Prog Aerospace Sci 40 8 (2004) 535-558
7. Farhat C., Geuzaine P., and Brown G. Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter. Comput Fluids 32 (2003) 3-29
8. Melville R. Nonlinear mechanisms of aeroelastic instability for the F-16. AIAA Paper 2002-0871, January; 2002.
9. Farhat C., van der Zee K.G., and Geuzaine P. Provably second-order time-accurate loosely-coupled solution algorithms for transient nonlinear computational aeroelasticity. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 195 17-18 (2006) 1973-2001
10. Kroyer R. FSI analysis in supersonic fluid flow. Comput Struct 72 (2003) 755-764
11. Bathe K.-J., Zhang H., and Ji S. Finite element analysis of fluid flows fully coupled with structural interactions. Comput Struct 72 (1999) 1-16
12. Le Tallec P., and Mouro J. Fluid structure interaction with large structural displacements. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 190 (2001) 3039-3067
13. Bathe K.-J., and Zhang H. Finite element developments for general fluid flows with structural interactions. Int J Numer Meth Eng 60 (2004) 213-232
14. Cavagna L., Quaranta G., Mantegazza P., Merlo E., Marchetti D., and Martegani M. Preliminary assessment of the complete aeroelastic simulation of the M-346 in transonic condition with a CFD Navier-Stokes solver. Aerotec Missili Spaz 84 3 (2005) 115-127
15. Batina J. Unsteady Euler airfoil solution using unstructured dynamic meshes. AIAA J 28 (1990) 1381-1388
16. Degand C., and Farhat C. A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes. Comput Struct 80 (2002) 305-316
17. Byun C, Guruswamy G. A parallel, multi-block, moving grid method for aeroelastic applications on full aircraft. AIAA Paper 98-4782, September; 1998.
18. Donea J. Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element methods. In: Belytschko T., and Hughes T.J. (Eds). Computational methods for transient analysis (1983), Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 474-516 [chapter 10]
19. Yates EC. AGARD standard aeroelastic configurations for dynamic response. I wing 445.6 R 765, AGARD; 1985.
20. Raveh D.E. Computational-fluid-dynamic-based aeroelastic analysis and structural design optimization - a researcher's perspective. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 194 (2005) 3453-3471
21. Cavagna L, Quaranta G, Ghiringhelli GL, Mantegazza P. Efficient application of CFD aeroelastic methods using commercial software. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics IFASD-2005, Munich, Germany; 2005.
22. Lisandrin P., Carpentieri G., and Van Tooren M. An investigation over CFD based models for the identification of nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics responses. AIAA J 44 9 (2006) 2043-2050
23. Giavotto V, Mantegazza P, Otto LD, Lucchesini M, Mantelli R. Fast flutter clearance by parameter variation. CP 354, AGARD, September; 1983.
24. Scotti A, Quaranta G, Ricci S. Active control of three surface wind tunnel aeroelastic demonstrator: Modelling and correlation. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics IFASD-2005, Munich, Germany; 2005.
25. Karpel M. Reduced order aeroelastic models via dynamic residualization. J Aircraft 27 5 (1990) 449-455
26. Morino L., Mastroddi F., De Troia F., Ghiringhelli G.L., and Mantegazza P. Matrix fraction approach for finite-state aerodynamic modeling. AIAA J 33 4 (1995) 703-711
27. Pasinetti G., and Mantegazza P. Single finite states modeling of aerodynamic forces related to structural motions and gusts. AIAA J 37 5 (1999) 604-612
28. Bisplinghoff R.L., Ashley H., and Halfman R.L. Aeroelasticity (1955), Addison Wesley, New York (NY)
29. Rodden W., and Gesling J. Application of oscillatory aerodynamic theory to estimation of stability derivatives. J Aircraft 7 3 (1970) 272-275
30. Thomas JP, Dowell EH, Hall KC. Three-dimensional transonic aeroelasticity using proper orthogonal decomposition based reduced order models. In: Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit, Seattle (WA); 2001, also published in J Aircraft 40 (2003).
31. Farhat C., and Lesoinne M. Two efficient staggered algorithms for the serial and parallel solution of three-dimensional nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 182 (2000) 499-515
32. Smith M.J., Hodges D.H., and Cesnik C.E. Evaluation of computational algorithms for suitable fluid-structure interactions. J Aircraft 37 2 (2000) 282-294
33. Maman N., and Farhat C. Matching fluid and structure meshes for aeroelastic computations: a parallel approach. Comput Struct 54 4 (1995) 779-785
34. Lancaster P., and Salkauskas K. Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods. Math Comput 37 (1981) 141-158
35. Schaback R. Remarks on meshless local construction of surfaces. In: Proceedings of IMA mathematics of surfaces IX conference, Cambridge; 2000.
36. Wendland H. Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree. Adv Comput Math 4 (1995) 389-396
37. Bathe K.J. Finite element procedures in engineering analysis (1982), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ)
38. Quaranta G, Masarati P, Mantegazza P. A conservative mesh-free approach for fluid-structure interface problems. In: Papadrakakis M, Oñate E, Schrefler B, editors. International conference on computational methods for coupled problems in science and engineering, CIMNE, Santorini, Greece; 2005.
39. Bottasso C.L., and Detomi D. A procedure for tetrahedral boundary layer mesh generation. Eng Comput 18 1 (2002) 66-79
40. Wessling P. An Introduction to Multigrid Methods (1992), Wiley, Chichester
41. Venkatakrishnan V, Mavriplis DJ. Agglomeration multigrid for the three-dimensional Euler equations. AIAA Paper 94-0069; 1994.
42. Ollivier-Gooch C. Robust coarsening of unstructured meshes for multigrid methods. In: Proceedings of the 14th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, Norfolk (VA); 1999.
43. Fluent 6.1 user's guide; 2003.
44. Giles M.B. Stability and accuracy of numerical boundary conditions in aeroelastic analysis. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 24 8 (1997) 739-757
45. Lee-Rausch E.M., and Batina J.T. Wing flutter computations using an aerodynamic model based on the Navier-Stokes equations. J Aircraft 33 6 (1996) 1139-1147
46. Chen P.C., and Liu D.D. A harmonic gradient method for unsteady supersonic flow calculations. J Aircraft 22 15 (1985) 371-379