Can patients' preferences for involvement in decision-making regarding the use of medicines be predicted?

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 361-367

  Garfield, S ^a   Smith, F ^a   Francis, S A ^a   Chalmers, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chronic illness; Concordance; Decision making; Medicines; Preferences for involvement; UK

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG UTILIZATION; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; GENDER; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SOCIAL CLASS; UNITED KINGDOM; VARIANCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; CHRONIC DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DRUG THERAPY; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 34248206246     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. RPSGB & MSD. From compliance to concordance: achieving shared goals in medicine taking. (1997), RPSGB, London
2. Sutherland H.J., Llewellyn-Thomas H.A., Lockwood G.A., and Trichler D.L. Cancer patients, their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med 82 (1989) 260-263
3. Beisecker A.E., and Beisecker T.D. Patient information-seeking behaviours when communicating with doctors. Med Care 28 (1990) 19-27
4. Degner L.F., and Sloan J.A. Decision-making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?. J Clin Epidemiol 45 (1992) 941-950
5. Gibson P.C., Talbot P.I., Toneguzzi R.C., and The Population Medicine Group 91C. Self-management, autonomy, control and quality of life in asthma. Chest 107 (1995) 1003-1008
6. Nease R.F., and Brooks W.B. Patient desire for information and decision making in healthcare decisions: the autonomy preference index and the health opinion survey. J Gen Intern Med 10 (1995) 593-600
7. Beaver K., Luker K.A., Owens R.G., Leinster S.J., and Degner L.F. Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 19 (1996) 8-19
8. Stiggelbout A.M., and Kiebert G.M. A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making. Can Med Assoc J 157 (1997) 383-389
9. Blanchard C.G., Labrecque M.S., Ruckdeschel J.C., and Blanchard E.B. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalised adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 27 (1998) 1139-1145
10. Davis M.A., Hoffman J.R., and HSU J. Impact of patient acuity on preference for information and autonomy in decision making. Acad Emerg Med 6 (1999) 781-785
11. Arora N., and Mcorney C.A. Patient preferences for medical decision making. Who really wants to participate?. Med Care 38 (2000) 335-341
12. Adams R.J., Smith B.J., and Ruffin R.E. Patient preferences for autonomy in decision-making in asthma management. Brit Med J 56 (2001) 126-132
13. Ende J., Kazis L., Ash A., and Moskowitz M.A. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy. J Gen Intern Med 4 (1989) 23-30
14. Bradley J.G., Zia M.J., and Hamilton N. Patient preferences for control in medical decision making: a scenario based approach. Fam Med 28 (1996) 496-501
15. Mckinstry B. Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes. Brit Med J 321 (2000) 867-871
16. Anell A., Rosen P., and Hjortsberg C. Choice and Participation in the health services: a survey of preferences among Swedish residents. Health Policy 40 (1997) 157-168
17. Levinson W., Kao A., Kuby A., and Thisted R.A. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of patient preferences. J Gen Intern Med 20 (2005) 531-535
18. Butow P.N., Maclean M., Dunn S.M., Tattersall M.H.N., and Boyer M.J. The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8 (1997) 857-863
19. Hack T.F., Degner L.F., and Dyck D.G. Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med 39 (1994) 279-289
20. O'Dell K.J., Volk R.J., Cass A.R., and Spann S.J. Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test. Are patients making informed decisions?. J Fam Practice 48 (1999) 682-688
21. Funk L.M. Who wants to be involved? Decision making preference among residents of long-term care facilities. Can J Aging 23 (2004) 47-58
22. Strull W.M., Lo B., and Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making. J Am Med Assoc 252 (1984) 2990-2994
23. Blackhall L.J., Murphy S.T., Frank G., Michel V., and Azen S. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. J Am Med Assoc 274 (1995) 820-825
24. Young M., and Klingle R.S. Silent partners in medical care. A cross cultural study of patient participation. Health Commun 8 (1996) 29-53
25. Degner L.F., Kristjanson L.J., Bowman D., Sloan J.A., Carriere O.J., Bilodeau B., Watson P., and Mueller B. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 277 (1997) 1485-1492
26. Krantz D.S., Baum A., and Wideman M.V. Assessment of preferences for self treatment and information in health care. J Pers Soc Psychol 39 (1980) 977-990
27. Shah R. Treatment-related empowerment: It's meaning for palliative care patients with cancer. Unpublished masters Thesis, University of London; 1997.
28. Garfield S., Francis S.A., and Smith F.J. Building concordant relationships with patients starting antidepressant medication. Patient Educ Couns 55 (2004) 241-246
29. Beaver K., Bogg J., and Luker K.A. Decision-making role preferences and information needs. A: Comparison of colorectal and breast cancer. Health Expect 2 (1999) 266-276
30. Entwistle V.A., Skea Z.C., and O'Donnell M.T. Decisions about treatment: interpretations of 2 measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Soc Sci Med 53 (2001) 721-732
31. Rose D., and O'Reilly K. The ESRC review of government social characteristics (1988), Economic and social research council and the government statistical service, London
32. The Euroqol Group. Euroqol-a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 16 (1990) 199-208
33. Redkop W.K., Koopmanschap M.A., Stolk R.P., Rutten G.E.H.M., Wolfenbuttel B.H.R., and Niessen L.W. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25 (2002) 458-463
34. Hurst N.P., Kind P., Ruta D., Hunter M., and Stubbings B. Measuring health related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of euroqol (EQ50). Brit J Rhematol 36 (1997) 551-559
35. Horne R., Weinman J., and Hankins M. The beliefs about medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health 14 (1999) 1-24
36. Say R., Murtagh M., and Thomson R. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns 60 (2006) 102-104