Motion tracking modulates capacity allocation of visual working memory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1011-1015

  Song, Joo Hyun ^a,b   Jiang, Yuhong V ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SMITH KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248199861     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03213917     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BECK, M. R., & LEVIN, D. T. (2003). The role of representational volatility in recognizing pre- and postchange objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 458-468.
2. BROADBENT, D. E., & BROADBENT, M. H. P. (1981). Recency effects in visual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 1-15.
3. BROCKMOLE, J. R., WANG, R. F., & IRWIN, D. E. (2002). Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 315-334.
4. DI LOLLO, V., ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
5. HENDERSON, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
6. HENDERSON, J. M., & ANES, M. D. (1994). Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 826-839.
7. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2003). Testing a conceptual locus for the inconsistent object charge detection advantage in real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition, 31, 930-940.
8. JIANG, Y. (2004). Time window from visual images to visual short-term memory: Consolidation or integration? Experimental Psychology, 51, 45-51.
9. JIANG, Y., & KUMAR, A. (2004). Visual short-term memory for two sequential arrays: One integrated representation or two separate representations? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 495-500.
10. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
11. LUCK, S. J., & VOGEL, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
12. PHILLIPS, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283-290.
13. PHILLIPS, W. A., & CHRISTIE, D. F. M. (1977). Interference with visualization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 637-650.
14. PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (2004). Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Visual Cognition, 11, 801-822.
15. PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & STORM, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
16. RENSINK, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 1, 17-42.
17. SAIKI, J. (2003). Feature binding in object-file representations of multiple moving items. Journal of Vision, 3, 6-21.
18. SCHOLL, B. J., PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & FRANCONERI, S. L. (1999, May). When are spatiotemporal and featural properties encoded as a result of attentional allocation? Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
19. SPERLING, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74(11, Whole No. 498).
20. STANDING, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207-222.