Glaucoma detection using different Stratus optical coherence tomography protocols

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 251-256

  Hougaard, Jesper Leth ^a   Heijl, Anders ^a   Bengtsson, Boel ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Glaucoma; Opticalcoherence tomography; Retinal nerve fibre layer; Stratus OCT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORMAL VALUE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINA NERVE CELL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THICKNESS; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EXFOLIATION SYNDROME; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34248190263     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: 16000420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00826.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Åsman P & Heijl A (1992): Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 110: 812-819.
2. Åsman P & Heijl A (1994): Diffuse visual field loss and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 72: 303-308.
3. Bagga H & Greenfield DS (2004): Quantitative assessment of structural damage in eyes with localized visual field abnormalities. Am J Ophthalmol 137: 797-805.
4. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC et al. (2001): Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 1993-2003.
5. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, McSoley J & Katz J (2005): Sensitivity and specificity of the Stratus OCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology 112: 3-9.
6. Chylack LT Jr, Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T & Sperduto R (1989): Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol 107: 991-997.
7. Chylack LT Jr, Leske MC, Sperduto R, Khu P & McCarthy D (1988): Lens Opacities Classification System. Arch Ophthalmol 106: 330-334.
8. Drance SM (1991): Diffuse visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 98: 1533-1538.
9. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, Nakla M, Coleman AL & Caprioli J (2002): Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 140-145.
10. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, Smith EL III & Crawford ML (1999): Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40: 2242-2250.
11. Heijl A (1989): Lack of diffuse loss of differential light sensitivity in early glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 67: 353-360.
12. Heijl A, Lindgren G & Olsson J (1987): A package for the statistical analysis of visual fields. J Doc Ophthalmol Proc Series 49: 153-168.
13. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J & Åsman P (1989): Visual field interpretation with empiric probability maps. Arch Ophthalmol 107: 204-208.
14. Hougaard JL, Heijl A & Krogh E (2004): The nerve fibre layer symmetry test: Computerized evaluation of human retinal nerve fibre layer thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 82: 410-418.
15. Hougaard JL, Ostenfeld C, Heijl A & Bengtsson B (2006): Modelling the normal retinal nerve fibre layer thickness as measured by Stratus optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0372-9.
16. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF & Mitchell RS (2000): Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 741-748.
17. Leung CK, Yung WH, Ng AC, Woo J, Tsang MK & Tse KK (2004): Evaluation of scanning resolution on retinal nerve fibre layer measurement using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 13: 479-485.
18. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C & Weinreb RN (2004): Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122: 827-837.
19. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Tannenbaum DP, Law SK & Caprioli J (2004): Identifying early glaucoma with optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 137: 228-235.
20. Quigley HA, Katz J, Derick RJ, Gilbert D & Sommer A (1992): An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fibre layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology 99: 19-28.
21. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Robin AL, Richter RC & Witt KA (1991): Clinically detectable nerve fibre atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 109: 77-83.
22. Tuulonen A & Airaksinen PJ (1991): Initial glaucomatous optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer abnormalities and their progression. Am J Ophthalmol 111: 485-490.
23. Tuulonen A, Lehtola J & Airaksinen PJ (1993): Nerve fibre layer defects with normal visual fields. Do normal optic disc and normal visual field indicate absence of glaucomatous abnormality? Ophthalmology 100: 587-597.
24. Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Wang J, Beaton SA & Schuman JS (2005): Comparison of three optical coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol 139: 39-43.