Frequency of multiple paternity in an unexploited tropical population of sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus)

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 198-204

  Daly Engel, Toby S ^a   Grubbs, R Dean ^b,c   Bowen, Brian W ^b   Toonen, Robert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; DOMINANCE; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHING MORTALITY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HARVESTING; PATERNITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SATELLITE DATA; SHARK; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT;

HAWAII [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CARCHARHINUS PLUMBEUS; CHONDRICHTHYES;

EID: 34248173332     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F07-005     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adams, E.M., Jones, A.G., and Arnold, S.J. 2005. Multiple paternity in a natural population of a salamander with long-term sperm storage. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1803-1810.
2. Anderson, E.D. 1990. Fishery models as applied to elasmobranch fisheries. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. NOAA/NMFS Rep. 90.
3. Barton, N.H., and Post, R.J. 1983. Competition between siblings and advantage of mixed families. J. Theor. Biol. 120: 381-387.
4. Branstetter, S. 1990. Early life-history implications of selected carcharhinoid and lamnoid sharks of the northwest Atlantic. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. NOAA/NMFS Rep. 90.
5. Bretman, A., and Tregenza, T. 2005. Measuring polyandry in wild populations: a case study using promiscuous crickets. Mol. Ecol. 14: 2169-2179.
6. Carrier, J.C., Pratt, H.L.J., and Martin, L.K. 1994. Group reproductive behaviors in free-living nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Copeia, 1994: 646-656.
7. Carrier, J.C., Pratt, H.L., and Castro, J.I. 2004. Reproductive biology of Elasmobranchs. In Biology of sharks and their relatives. Edited by J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick, and M.R. Heithaus. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 269-286.
8. Chapman, D.D., Prodohl, PA., Gelsleicher, J., Manire, C.A., and Mahmood, S.S. 2004. Predominance of genetic monogamy by females in a hammerhead shark, Sphyrna tiburo: implications for shark conservation. Mol. Ecol. 13: 1965-1974.
9. Crespi, B., and Semeniuk, C. 2004. Parent-offspring conflict in the evolution of vertebrate reproductive mode. Am. Nat. 163: 635-653.
10. Daly-Engel, T.S., Grubbs, R.D., Holland, K.N., Toonen, R.J., and Bowen, B.W. 2006. Assessment of multiple paternity in single litters from three species of carcharhinid sharks in Hawaii. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 76: 419-424.
11. DeWoody, J.A., and Avise, J.C. 2001. Genetic perspectives on the natural history of fish mating systems. J. Hered. 92: 167-172.
12. Feldheim, K.A., Gruber, S.H., and Ashley, M.V. 2001. Multiple paternity of a lemon shark litter (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhinidae). Copeia, 2001: 781-786.
13. Feldheim, K.A., Gruber, S.H., and Ashley, M.V. 2004. Reconstruction of parental microsatellite genotypes reveals female polyandry and philopatry in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. Evolution, 58: 2332-2342.
14. Frankham, R. 2005. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 126: 131-140.
15. Grubbs, R.D., Musick, J.A., Conrath, C.L., and Romine, J.G. 2007. Migratory movements, philopatry, and temporal delineation of summer nurseries for juvenile sandbar sharks, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in the Chesapeake Bay region. Am. Fish. Soc. In press.
16. Hamlett, W.C., Jones, C.J.P., and Paulesu, L.R. 2005. Placentatrophy in sharks. In Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: sharks, batoids, and chimaeras. Edited by W.C. Hamlett. Science Publishers, Inc., Plymouth, UK. pp. 463-502.
17. e/N ratio. Evolution, 59: 1596-1599.
18. Heist, E.J. 2004. Genetics of sharks, skates, and rays. In Biology of sharks and their relatives. Edited by J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick, and M.R. Heithaus. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 471-486.
19. Hoekert, W.E.J., Neufeglise, H., Schouten, A.D., and Menken, S.B.J. 2002. Multiple paternity and female-biased mutation at a microsatellite locus in the olive ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea). Heredity, 89: 107-113.
20. Hoenig, J.M., and Gruber, S.H. 1990. Life-history patterns in elasmobranchs: implications for fisheries management. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. NOAA/NMFS Rep. 90.
21. Holden, M.J. 1973. Are long-term sustainable fisheries for elasmobranchs possible? Rapp. P.-V. Réun. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, 64: 360-367.
22. IUCN. 2005. The IUCN red list of threatened species: habitats authority file. In Authority files for habitats, threats, conservation actions and utilization of species [online]. Available from http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/ sis/authority.htm [accessed January 2006].
23. Jennions, M.D., and Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 75: 21-64.
24. Joung, S.-J., and Chen, C.-T. 1995. Reproduction in the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in the waters off northeastern Taiwan. Copeia, 1995: 659-665.
25. Joung, S.-J., Liao, Y.-Y., and Chen, C.-T. 2004. Age and growth of sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in northeastern Taiwanese waters. Fish. Res. 70: 83-96.
26. Keeney, D.B., and Heist, E.J. 2003. Characterization of microsatellite loci isolated from the blacktip shark and their utility in requiem and hammerhead sharks. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 3: 501-504.
27. Ketchen, K.S. 1969. A review of the dogfish problem off the western coast of Canada. Fish. Res. Board Can. MS. Rep. Ser. 1048.
28. Lande, R., and Shannon, S. 1996. The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistence in a changing environment. Evolution, 50: 434-437.
29. Levitus, S. 1987. A comparison of the annual cycle of two sea surface temperature climatologies of the world ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 17: 197-214.
30. Madsen, T., Ujvari, B., Olsson, M., and Shine, R. 2005. Paternal alleles enhance female reproductive success in tropical pythons. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1783-1787.
31. Martinez, J.L., Moran, P., Perez, J., De Gaudemar, B., Beall, E., and Garcia-Vazquez, E. 2000. Multiple paternity increases effective size of southern Atlantic salmon populations. Mol. Ecol. 9: 293-298.
32. Moon, J.C, McCoy, E.D., Mushinsky, H.R., and Karl, S.A. 2006. Multiple paternity and breeding system in the gopher tortoise, Gopherus polyphemus. J. Hered. 97: 150-157.
33. Musick, J.A. 1999. Ecology and conservation of long-lived marine animals. In Life in the Slow Lane: Ecology and Conservation of Long-Lived Marine Animals, American Fisheries Society Symposium 23, Bethesda, Md. Edited by J. Musick. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Md. pp. 1-10.
34. Musick, J.A., Branstetter, S., and Colvocoresses, J.A. 1993. Trends in shark abundance from 1974 to 1991 for the Chesapeake Bight region of the U.S. mid-Atlantic coast. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. NOAA/NMFS Rep. 115.
35. Musick, J.A., and Ellis, J.K. 2005. Reproductive evolution of Chondrichthyes. In Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: sharks, batoids, and chimaeras. Edited by W.C. Hamlett. Science Publishers, Inc., Plymouth, UK. pp. 45-79.
36. Neff, B.D., and Pitcher, T.E. 2002. Assessing the statistical power of genetic analyses to detect multiple mating in fish. J. Fish Biol. 61: 739-750.
37. Neff, B.D., and Pitcher, T.E. 2005. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol. Ecol. 14: 19-38.
38. Neff, B.D., Pitcher, T.E., and Repka, J. 2002. A Bayesian model for assessing the frequency of multiple mating in nature. J. Hered. 93: 406-414.
39. Newcomer, S.D., Zeh, J.A., and Zeh, D.W. 1999. Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 10236-10241.
40. NMFS. 2003. Final amendment 1 to the fishery management plan for Atlantic tunas, swordfish, and sharks. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, US Department of Commerce, Highly Migratory Species Management Division, Silver Spring, Md.
41. Nunney, L. 1993. The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution, 47: 1329-1341.
42. Olsen, A.M. 1959. The status of the school shark fishery in southeastern Australia waters. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 10: 150-176.
43. Pratt, H.L. 1993. The storage of spermatozoa in the oviducal glands of western North Atlantic sharks. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 38: 139-149.
44. Pratt, H.L., and Carrier, J.C. 2001. A review of elasmobranch reproductive behavior with a case study on the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 60: 157-188.
45. Ramakrishnan, U., Storz, J.F., Taylor, B.L., and Lande, R. 2004. Estimation of genetically effective breeding numbers using a rejection algorithm approach. Mol. Ecol. 13: 3283-3292.
46. Raymond, M., and Rousset, F. 1995. GENEPOP Version 1.2. Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248-249.
47. Reynolds, J.D. 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 68-72.
48. Ridley, M. 1993. Clutch size and mating frequency in parasitic Hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 142: 893-910.
49. Romine, J.G., Grubbs, R.D., and Musick, J.A. 2006. Age and growth of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in Hawaiian waters through vertebral analysis. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 77(3-4): 229-239.
50. Rowe, S., and Hutchings, J.A. 2003. Mating systems and the conservation of commercially exploited marine fish. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 567-572.
51. Saville, K.J., Lindley, A.M., Maries, E.G., Carrier, J.C, and Pratt, H.L.J. 2002. Multiple paternity in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 63: 347-352.
52. Selkoe, K.A., and Toonen, R.J. 2006. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide for using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol. Lett. 9: 615-629.
53. Seutin, G., White, B.N., and Boag, P.T. 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can. J. Zool. 69(1): 82-90.
54. Sminkey, T.R., and Musick, J.A. 1996. Demographic analysis of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in the western North Atlantic. Fish. Bull. 94: 341-347.
55. Smith, S.E., Au, D.W., and Show, C. 1998. Intrinsic rebound potentials of 26 species of Pacific sharks. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49: 663-678.
56. Springer, S. 1960. Natural history of the sandbar shark Eulamia milberti. Fish. Bull. 61: 1-36.
57. Sunnucks, P. 2000. Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 199-203.
58. Sunnucks, P., and Hales, D.F. 1996. Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 510-524.
59. Toonen, R.J. 2004. Genetic evidence of multiple paternity of broods in the intertidal crab, Petrolisthes cinctipes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 270: 259-263.
60. Tregenza, T, and Wedell, N. 2002. Polyandrous females avoid cost of inbreeding. Nature (London), 6837: 71-73.
61. Valiere, N. 2002. GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2: 377-379.
62. van Oosterhout, C.V., Hutchinson, W., Wills, D., and Shipley, P. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotype errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 4: 535-538.
63. Vieites, D.R., Nieto-Roman, S., Barluenga, M., Palanca, A., Vences, M., and Meyer, A. 2004. Post-mating clutch piracy in an amphibian. Nature (London), 431: 305-308.
64. Walker, T.I., Taylor, B.L., Hudson, R.J., and Cottier, J.P 1998. The phenomenon of apparent change of growth rate in gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) harvested off southern Australia. Fish. Res. 39: 139-163.
65. Watson, P.J. 1991. Multiple paternity as genetic bet hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim. Behav. 41: 343-360.
66. Whitney, N.M., Pratt, H.L., and Carrier, J.C. 2004. Group courtship, mating behaviour and siphon sac function in the whitetip reef shark, Triaenodon obesus. Anim. Behav. 68: 1435-1442.
67. Yasui, Y. 1998. The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 246-250.
68. Zane, L., Nelson, W.S., Jones, A.G., and Avise, J.C. 1999. Microsatellite assessment of multiple paternity in natural populations of a live-bearing fish, Gambusia holbrooki. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 61-69.
69. Zeh, J.A., and Zeh, D.W. 2001. Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Anim. Behav. 61: 1051-1063.
70. Zeh, J.A., and Zeh, D.W. 2003. Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict, and incompatibility. Ethology, 109: 929-950.