A Bayesian model for assessing the frequency of multiple mating in nature

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 406-414

  Neff, Bryan D ^a   Pitcher, T E ^b   Repka, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR MARKER;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIOR; BREEDING; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MODEL; GENOTYPE; LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPI; MATING; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TURTLE;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

CHELONIIDAE; LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII; TESTUDINES;

EID: 0036880893     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/93.6.406     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barry FE, Weatherhead PJ, and Philipp DP, 1992. Multiple paternity in a wild population of northern water snakes, Nerodia sipedon. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:193-199.
2. Birdsall DA and Nash D, 1973. Occurrence of successful multiple insemination of females in natural populations of deer mice (Peromysus maniculatus). Evolution 27:106-110.
3. DeWoody JA, DeWoody YD, Fiumera AC, and Avise JC, 2000a. On the number of reproductives contributing to a half-sib progeny array. Genet Res Camb 75:95-105.
4. DeWoody JA, Walker D, and Avise JC, 2000b. Genetic parentage in large half-sib clutches: theoretical estimates and empirical appraisals. Genetics 154: 1907-1912.
5. Fiumera AC, DeWoody YD, DeWoody JA, Asmussen MA, and Avise JC, 2001. Accuracy and precision of methods to estimate the number of parents contributing to a half-sib progeny array. J Hered 92:120-126.
6. Hirth HF, 1980. Some aspects of the nesting behavior and reproductive biology of sea turtles. Amer Zool 20:507-523.
7. Jarne P and Lagoda JL, 1996. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends Ecol Evol 8:285-288.
8. Jennions MD and Petrie M, 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21-64.
9. Kelly CD, Godin J-GJ, and Wright JM, 1999. Geographic variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc Roy Soc Lond B 266:2403-2408.
10. Kichler K, Holder MT, Davis SK, Márquez-M R, and Owens DW, 1999. Detection of multiple paternity in the Kemp's Ridley sea turtle with limited sampling. Mol Ecol 8:819-830.
11. Krebs JR and Davies NB, eds, 1997. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
12. Lewis PO, 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends Ecol Evol 16:30-37.
13. Manly BFJ, 1997. Randomization, bootstrapping and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall.
14. Mendonça MT and Pritchard PCH, 1986. Offshore movements of post-nesting Kemp's Ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempi). Herpetologica 42:373-381.
15. Milkman R and Zeitler RR, 1974. Concurrent multiple paternity in natural and laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 78:1191-1193.
16. Neff BD and Pitcher TE, 2002. Assessing the statistical power of genetic analyses to detect multiple mating in fish. J Fish Biol 61:739-750.
17. Neff BD, Repka J, and Gross MR, 2000a. Parentage analysis with incomplete sampling of candidate parents and offspring. Mol Ecol 9:515-528.
18. Neff BD, Repka J, and Gross MR, 2000b. Statistical confidence in models of parentage analysis with incomplete sampling: how many loci and offspring are needed? Mol Ecol 9:529-539.
19. Neff BD, Repka J, and Gross MR, 2001. A Bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data. Theor Popul Biol 59:315-331.
20. Ochando MD, Reyes A, and Ayala FJ, 1996. Multiple paternity in two natural populations (orchard and vineyard) of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11769-11773.
21. Pearse DE, Janzen FJ, and Avise JC, 2002. Multiple paternity, sperm storage, and reproductive success of female and male painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) in nature. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:164-171.
22. Pedersen JS and Boomsma JJ, 1999. Multiple paternity in social Hymenoptera: estimating the effective mate number in single-double mating populations. Mol Ecol 8:577-587.
23. Reynolds JD, 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol Evol 11:68-72.
24. Schwartz JM, McCracken GF, and Burghardt GM, 1989. Multiple paternity in wild populations of the garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:269-273.
25. Trexler JC, Travis J, and Dinep A, 1997. Variation among populations of the sailfin molly in the rate of concurrent multiple paternity and its implications for mating-system evolution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:297-305.
26. Williams CJ and Evarts S, 1989. The estimation of concurrent multiple paternity probabilities in natural populations. Theor Popul Biol 35:90-112.
27. Zane L, Nelson WS, Jone AG, and Avise JC, 1999. Microsatellite assessment of multiple paternity in natural populations of a live bearing fish, Gambusia holbrooki. J Evol Biol 12:61-69.