Conservation of butterfly populations in dynamic landscapes: The role of farming practices and landscape mosaic

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 205, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 135-145

  Aviron, Stephanie ^a,b   Kindlmann, Pavel ^a,c   Burel, Francoise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^b AGROSCOPE RECKENHOLZ TÄNIKON RESEARCH STATION ART   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Landscape dynamics; Movement; Resource disturbance; Simulation model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS; RESOURCE DISTURBANCE; SIMULATION MODEL;

ECOLOGY;

BUTTERFLY; CONNECTIVITY; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; MOVEMENT; MOWING; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SIMULATION; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

MANIOLA JURTINA; NYMPHALIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 34248159495     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agger P., and Brandt J. Dynamics of small biotopes in Danish agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 1 (1988) 227-240
2. Baker W.L. A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecol. 2 (1989) 111-135
3. Baudry J., Burel F., Aviron S., Martin M., Ouin A., Pain G., and Thenail C. Temporal variability of connectivity in agricultural landscapes: do farming activities help?. Landscape Ecol. 18 (2003) 303-314
4. Benton T.G., Vickery J.A., and Wilson J.D. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?. TREE 18 (2003) 182-188
5. Bergman K.-O., and Kindvall O. Population viability analysis of the butterfly Lopinga achine in a changing landscape in Sweden. Ecography 27 (2004) 49-58
6. Chaïb J., and de Manneville H. La Gestion Différenciée des Bords de Routes (2003), Agence Régionale de L'environnement de Haute-Normandie, France
7. Council of Europe. 1997. Agriculture and Biodiversity. Questions and Answers 2. http://www.coe.int/T/e/Cultural_Cooperation/Environment/Nature_and_biological_diversity/Publications
8. Conradt L., Bodsworth E.J., Roper T.J., and Thomas C.D. Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 (2000) 1505-1570
9. Denslow J.S. Disturbance-mediated coexistence of species. In: Pickett S.T.A., and White P.S. (Eds). The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (1985), Academic Press, New York 307-323
10. Dover J.W. The use of flowers by butterflies foraging in cereal field margins. Entomol. Gazette 40 (1989) 283-294
11. Dover J.W. Arable field margins: factors affecting butterfly distribution and abundance. In: Boatman N.D. (Ed). Field Margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation (1994), BCPC Publications, Farnham 59-66
12. Dover J.W. Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. J. Appl. Ecol. 33 (1996) 723-734
13. Fahrig L. Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment. Theor. Popul. Biol. 41 (1992) 300-314
14. Fahrig L., and Merriam G. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv. Biol. 8 (1994) 50-59
15. Feber, R.E., 1993. The ecology and conservation of butterflies on lowland arable farmland. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Oxford.
16. Feber R.E., and Smith H. Butterfly conservation on arable farmland. In: Pullin A.S. (Ed). Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (1995), Chapman & Hall, London 84-97
17. Feber R.E., Smith H., and MacDonald D.W. The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 33 (1996) 1191-1205
18. Fleishman E., Ray C., Sjögren-Gulve P., and Boggs C.L. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv. Biol. 16 (2002) 1-11
19. Fry G., and Robson W.J. The effects of field margins on butterfly movement. BCPC Monogr. 58 (1994) 111-116
20. Gaucherel C., Giboire N., Viaud V., Houet T., Baudry J., and Burel F. A domain-specific language for patchy landscape modelling: the Brittany agricultural mosaic as a case study. Ecol. Model. 194 (2006) 233-243
21. Geertsema W., and Sprangers J.T.C.M. Plant distribution patterns related to species characteristics and spatial and temporal habitat heterogeneity in a network of ditch banks. Plant Ecol. 162 (2002) 91-108
22. Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396 (1998) 41-49
23. Hanski I. Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87 (1999) 209-219
24. Hanski I., and Thomas C.D. Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 68 (1994) 167-180
25. Hilker F., Hinsch M., and Poethke H.J. Parameterizing, evaluating and comparing metapopulation models with data from individual-based simulations. Ecol. Model. 199 (2006) 476-485
26. Kindlmann P., Aviron S., Burel F., and Ouin A. Can assumption of a non-random search improve our prediction of butterfly fluxes between resource patches?. Ecol Entomol. 29 (2004) 447-456
27. Kitahara M., and Sei K. A comparison of the diversity and structure of butterfly communities in semi-natural and human-modified grassland habitats at the foot of Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Biodiv. Conserv. 10 (2001) 331-351
28. Kuussaari M., Nieminen M., and Hanski I. An experimental study of migration in the glanville Fritillary butterfly Melitea cinxia. J. Anim. Ecol. 65 (1996) 791-801
29. Larson M.A., Thompson F.R., Millspaugh J.J., Dijak W.D., and Shofley S.R. Linking population viability, habitat suitability, and landscape simulation models for conservation planning. Ecol. Model. 180 (2004) 103-118
30. MacDonald D.W., and Smith H. New perspectives on agro-ecology. In: Firbank L.G., Carter N., Darbyshire J.F., and Potts G.R. (Eds). The Ecology of Temperate Cereal Fields (1991), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 413-449
31. In: Manly B.F.J. (Ed). Randomization Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology (1998), Chapman and Hall, London
32. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalised regression approach. Cancer Res. 27 (1967) 209-220
33. Matter S.F. Modeling the density-area relationship in a dynamic landscape: an examination for the beetle Tetraopes tetraophthalmus and a generalized model. Ecol. Model. 169 (2003) 103-117
34. McLaughlin A., and Mineau P. The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 55 (1995) 201-212
35. Meeus J.H.A. Pan-European landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan. 31 (1995) 57-79
36. Oates M.R. Butterfly conservation within the management of grassland habitats. In: Pullin A.S. (Ed). Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (1995), Chapman and Hall, London 98-112
37. Ouin A., Aviron S., Dover J., and Burel F. Complementation/supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 103 (2004) 473-479
38. Pollard E. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 12 (1977) 115-134
39. Parry H.R., Evans A.J., and Morgan D. Aphid population response to agricultural landscape change: a spatially explicit, individual-based model. Ecol. Model. 199 (2006) 451-463
40. Roland J., Keyghobadi N., and Fownes S. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81 (2000) 1642-1653
41. Schneider C. The influence of spatial scale on quantifying insect dispersal: an analysis of butterfly data. Ecol. Entomol. 28 (2003) 252-256
42. Schneider C., Dover J.W., and Fry G.L.A. Movement of two grassland butterflies in the same habitat network: the role of adult resources and size of the study area. Ecol. Entomol. 28 (2003) 219-227
43. Schtickzelle N., and Baguette M. Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS. Oikos 104 (2004) 277-290
44. Sotherton N.W. Land use changes and the decline of farmland wildlife: an appraisal of the set-aside approach. Biol. Conserv. 83 (1998) 259-268
45. In: Soulé M.E. (Ed). Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity (1986), Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass
46. Steffan-Dewenter I. Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003) 1036-1044
47. Thies C., Steffan-Dewenter I., and Tscharntke T. Effects of landscape context on herbivory and parasitism at different spatial scales. Oikos 101 (2003) 18-25
48. Thomas C.D. Spatial and temporal variability in a butterfly population. Oecologia 87 (1991) 577-580
49. Vos C.C., Verboom J., Opdam P.F.M., and Ter Braak C.F.J. Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am. Nat. 183 (2001) 24-40
50. Wiens J.A. Wildlife in patchy environments: metapopulations, mosaics and management. In: McCullough D.R. (Ed). Metapopulation and Wildlife Conservation (1996), Island Press, Washington, DC, USA 53-84
51. Wilson J.D., Morris A.J., Arroyo B.E., Clark S.C., and Bradbury R. A review of abundance and diversity of invertebrates and plant food of granivory birds in Northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 75 (1999) 13-30
52. With K.A., Gardner R.H., and Turner M.G. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78 (1997) 151-169
53. With K.A., and King A.W. Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds. Landscape Ecol. 14 (1999) 73-82