Rheological characterization of neutral and anionic polysaccharides with reduced mucociliary transport rates

AAPS PharmSciTech

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages E40-

  Shah, Ankur J ^a,b   Donovan, Maureen D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Alginate; Carboxy methylcellulose; Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; Methylcellulose; Mucociliary clearance; Rheology; Xanthan

Indexed keywords

POLYMER; POLYSACCHARIDE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CILIARY MOTILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG FORMULATION; FLOW KINETICS; GEL; MUCOCILIARY CLEARANCE; MUCOCILIARY TRANSPORT; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; TRACHEA MUCOSA; VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOSITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 34247863965     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15309932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1208/pt0802032     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Dulfano M, Adler K. Physical properties and mucociliary transport, VII: rheologic properties and mucociliary transport. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975;112:341-347.
2. Chen TM, Dulfano M. Mucus viscoelasticity and mucociliary transport rate. J Lab Clin Med. 1978;91:423-431.
3. Shih C, Litt M, Khan M, Wolf P. Effect of nondialysable solids concentration and viscoelasticity on ciliary transport of tracheal mucus. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1977;115:989-995.
4. King M, Gilboa A, Meyer F, Silberberg A. On the transport of mucus and its rheological simulants in ciliated systems. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974;110:740-745.
5. Majima Y, Sakakura Y, Matsubara T. Rheological properties of middle ear effusions from children with otitis media with effusion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1986;124:1-4.
6. Gelman R, Meyer F. Mucociliary transference rate and mucus viscoelasticity: dependence on dynamic storage and loss modulus. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979;120:553-557.
7. Puchelle E, Zahm JM, Quemada D. Rheological properties controlling mucociliary frequency and respiratory mucus transport. Biorheology. 1987;24:557-563.
8. Hassan EE, Gallo JM. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm Res. 1990;7:491-495.
9. Edsman K, Hagerstrom H. Pharmaceutical applications of mucoadhesion for the non-oral routes. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2005; 57:3-22.
10. Hagerstrom H, Edsman K. Limitations of the rheological mucoadhesion method: the effect of choice of conditions and the rheologic synergism parameter. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2003;18: 349-357.
11. Lin SY, Amidon GL, Weiner ND, Goldberg AH. Viscoelasticity of cellulose polymers and mucociliary transport on frog palates. Int J Pharm. 1993;95:57-65.
12. Lin SY, Amidon GL, Weiner ND, Goldberg AH. Viscoelasticity of anionic polymers and their mucociliary transport in the frog palate. Pharm Res. 1993;10:411-417.
13. Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD. A rheological examination of the mucoadhesive/mucus interaction: the effect of mucoadhesive type and concentration. J Control Release. 1998;50:167-178.
14. List SJ, Findlay BP, Forstner GG, Forstner JF. Enhancement of the viscosity of mucin by serum albumin. Biochem J. 1978;175:565-571.
15. Khanvilkar K, Donovan MD, Flanagan DR. Drug transfer through mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;48:173-193.
16. Shah AJ. Viscoelastic Gels Resistant to Mucociliary Clearance: Rheological and Chemical Optimization for Prolonged Mucosal Contact [thesis]. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa; 2005.
17. Keck T, Leiacker R, Riechelmann H, Rettinger G. Temperature profile in the nasal cavity. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:651-654.
18. Widdicombe JG, Wells UM. Airway Secretions. In: Proctor DF, Anderson IP, eds. The Nose: Upper Airway Physiology and the Atmospheric Environment. New York, NY: Elsevier Biomedical Press; 1982:215-244.
19. Yu DM, Amidon GL, Weiner ND, Fleisher D, Goldberg AH. The role of rheological properties in mucociliary transport by frog palate ciliated model. Pharm Res. 1994;11:1785-1791.
20. Lorenzi G, Bohm G, Guimaraes E, Vaz M, King M, Saldiva P. Correlation between rheological properties and in vitro ciliary transport of rat nasal mucus. Biorheology. 1992;29:433-440.
21. Macchione M, King M, Lorenzi G, et al. Rheological determinants of mucociliary transport in the nose of the rat. Respir Physiol. 1995;99:165-172.
22. King M. Relationship between mucus viscoelasticity and ciliary transport in guaran gel/frog palate model system. Biorheology. 1980;17:249-254.
23. Duchene D, Touchard F, Peppas NA. Pharmaceutical and medical aspects of bioadhesive systems for drug administration. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1988;14:283-318.