Pain and functional ability in patients operated with total disc replacement in the lumbar spine;Smerte- og funksjonsforløp hos pasienter med lumbal skiveprotese

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 127, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1188-1191

  Rognsvåg, Turid ^a   Strand, Liv Inger ^b,c   Skouen, Jan Sture ^b,c  

^a Kysthospitalet I Hagevik ^*  (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 34247859265     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: 08077096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P et al. 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001; 26: 2521-32.
2. Brox JI, Sørensen R, Friis A et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 2003; 28: 1913-21.
3. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 722-6.
4. Errico TJ. Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2005; 435: 106-17.
5. Marnay T. Lumbar disc replacement: 7 to 11-year results with Prodisc. Spine J 2002; 2: 94S.
6. Freeman BJC, Davenport J. Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 439-47.
7. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS et al. Degenerative disc disease: Assessment on changes in vertebral body marrow with MRI imaging. Radiology 1988; 168: 177-86.
8. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000; 25: 3115-24.
9. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. The clinical improtance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2003; 12: 12-20.
10. Jensen MP, Karoly P. Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. I: Turk DC, Melzack R. Handbook of pain assessment. 2. utg. New York: Guilford Press, 2001.
11. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numeric pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94: 149-58.
12. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K et al. The Hopkins Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci 1974; 19: 1-14.
13. Goldberg DP, Rickels K, Downing R et al. A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 129; 61-7.
14. Strand LI, Moe-Nilssen R, Ljunggren AE. Back Performance Scale for the assessment of mobility-related activities in people with back pain. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 1213-23.
15. Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S et al. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998: 23: 2412-21.
16. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW et al. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. A guide to enhanced clinical decision-making. Hamilton, Ontario: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.
17. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. 2. utg. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
18. Waddell G. The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
19. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LEA et al. ProDisc artificial total lumbar replacement: Introduction and early results from the united states clinical trial. Spine 2003; 28: S167-75.
20. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A et al. Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 2002; 11(suppl 2): S124-30.
21. Magnussen L, Strand LI, Lygren H. Reliability and validity of the Back Performance scale: Observing activity limitation in patients with back pain. Spine 2004; 29: 903-7.
22. Zigler JE. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II. Spine J 2004; 4: 260-7S.