Bridging the gap between human and automatic speech recognition

Speech Communication

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 331-335

  ten Bosch, Louis ^a   Kirchhoff, Katrin ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247844467     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2007.03.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (35)

1. Barker J., and Cooke M. Modelling speaker intelligibility in noise. Speech Comm. 49 5 (2007) 402-417
2. Bourlard H., Hermansky H., and Morgan N. Towards increasing speech recognition error rates. Speech Comm. May (1996) 205-231
3. Bregman A. Auditory Scene Analysis (1990), MIT Press
4. Carey, M.J., Quang, T.P., 2005. A speech similarity distance weighting for robust recognition. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1257-1260.
5. Carpenter, B., 1999. Human versus machine: psycholinguistics meets ASR. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Keystone, CO, pp. 225-228.
6. Coy A., and Barker J. An automatic speech recognition system based scene analysis account of auditory perception. Speech Comm. 49 5 (2007) 384-401
7. De Wachter, M., Demuynck, K., van Compernolle, D., Wambaq, P., 2003. Data driven example based continuous speech recognition. In: Proc. of Eurospeech, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1133-1136.
8. Dusan, S., Rabiner, L.R., 2005. On integrating insights from human speech recognition into automatic speech recognition. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1233-1236.
9. Fikkert P. Getting sounds structures in mind. Acquisition bridging linguistics and psychology?. In: Cutler A.E. (Ed). Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 43-56
10. Hämäläinen, A., ten Bosch, L., Boves, L., 2007. Modelling pronunciation variation using multi-path HMMs for syllables. In: Proceedings of ICASSP, Honolulu, USA.
11. Han, Y., de Veth, J., Boves, L., 2007. Trajectory clustering for solving the trajectory folding problem in Automatic Speech Recognition. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., in press.
12. Hermansky, H., 2001. Human speech recognition: some lessons from automatic speech recognition. In: Smits, R., Kingston, J., Nearey, T.M., Zondervan, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech Recognition as Pattern Classification, Nijmegen, MPI for Psycholinguistics, pp. 61-66.
13. m: a technique applied to recovering articulation from acoustics. Speech Comm. 49 5 (2007) 361-383
14. King S., and Taylor P. Detection of phonological features in continuous speech using neural networks. Comput. Speech Lang. 14 (2000) 333-353
15. Kirchhoff K., Fink G.A., and Sagerer G. Combining acoustic and articulatory feature information for robust speech recognition. Speech Comm. 37 3/4 (2002) 303-319
16. Lindblom B. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In: Hardcastle W.J., and Marchal A. (Eds). Speech Production and Speech Modelling (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 403-439
17. Lippmann R. Speech recognition by machines and humans. Speech Comm. 22 1 (1997) 1-15
18. Livescu, K., Glass, J., Bilmes, J., 2003. Hidden feature models for speech recognition using dynamic Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 2529-2532.
19. Luce P.A., and Pisoni D.B. Recognising spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear. 19 (1998) 1-36
20. Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (1982), Freeman & Co, San Francisco
21. McClelland J.L., and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognit. Psychol. 18 (1986) 1-86
22. McDermott E., and Nakamura A. Production-oriented models for speech recognition. IEICE Trans. Special Issue Statist. Model. Speech Process. E89-D 3 (2006) 1006-1014
23. Metze F. Discriminative speaker adaptation using articulatory features. Speech Comm. 49 5 (2007) 348-360
24. Moore, R.K., 2003. A comparison of the data requirements of automatic speech recognition systems and human listeners. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 2581-2584.
25. Moore R.K. Spoken language processing: piecing together the puzzle. Speech Comm. 49 5 (2007) 418-435
26. Moore, R.K., Cutler, A., 2001. Constraints on theories of human vs. machine recognition of speech. In: Smits, R., Kingston, J., Nearey, T.M., Zondervan, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech Recognition as Pattern Classification, Nijmegen, MPI for Psycholinguistics, pp. 145-150.
27. Nearey, T.M., 2001. Towards modelling the perception of variable-length phonetic strings. In: Smits, R., Kingston, J., Nearey, T.M., Zondervan, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech Recognition as Pattern Classification, Nijmegen, MPI for Psycholinguistics, pp. 133-138.
28. Norris D. Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52 (1994) 189-234
29. Roy D.K., and Pentland A.P. Learning words from sights and sounds: a computational model. Cognit. Sci. 26 (2002) 113-146
30. Scharenborg O. Reaching over the gap: a review of efforts to link human and automatic speech recognition research. Speech Comm. 49 5 (2007) 336-347
31. Scharenborg O., Norris D., ten Bosch L., and McQueen J. How should a speech recognizer work?. Cognit. Sci. 29 6 (2005) 867-918
32. Sroka J.J., and Braida L.D. Human and machine consonant recognition. Speech Comm. 45 (2005) 401-423
33. Weizenbaum J. Computer Power and Human Reason - From Judgement to Calculation (1976), W.H. Freeman & Company, New York, NY
34. Wright, R., 2006. Intra-speaker variation and units in human speech perception and ASR. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech Recognition and Intrinsic Variation, Toulouse, France, pp. 39-42.
35. Yu D., Deng L., and Acero A. A lattice search technique for long-contextual-span hidden trajectory model of speech. Speech Comm. 48 (2006) 1214-1226