Getting sound structures in mind: Acquisition bridging linguistics and psychology?

Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 43-56

  Fikkert, Paula ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247881319     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315084503-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
3. Chomksy, N. (2004). Key note lecture, GLOW 2004. Thessaloniki, Greece.
4. Davidson, L., Jusczyk, P. W., & Smolensky, P. (2004). The initial and final states: Theoretical implications and experimental explorations of Richness of the Base. In Kager et al. (Eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp. 321–368). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Davis, B. L, MacNeilage, P. F., & Matyear, C. L. (2002). Acquisition of serial complexity in speech production: A comparison of phonetic and phonological approaches to first word production. Phonetica, 59, 75–109.
6. Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P. W., & Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303–306.
7. Ferguson, C. A., & Garnica, O. K. (1975). Theories of phonological development. In E. H. Lenneberg & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Foundations of language development (Vol. 1, pp. 153–180). New York: Academic Press.
8. Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden, HIL Dissertations 6. The Hague: HAG.
9. Fikkert, P., & Levelt, C. C., & Zamuner, T. (in prep.). Perception through production? Manuscript. Radboud University Nijmegen & University of Leiden.
10. Fikkert, P., & Levelt, C. C. (2004). How does place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in the developing phonological grammar. Manuscript. Radboud University Nijmegen & University of Leiden.
11. Fischer, C., Church, B. A., & Chambers, K. E. (2004). Learning to identify spoken words. In D. G. Hall & S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon, (pp. 3–40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Fitzpatrick, J., & Wheeldon, L. (2000). Phonology and phonetics in psycholinguistc models of speech perception. In N. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr & G. Docherty (Eds.), Phonological knowledge. Conceptual and empirical issues (pp. 131–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Halle, M. (2002). From memory to speech and back. Papers on phonetics and phonology 1954–2002. Berlin: Mouton.
14. Jakobson, R. (1941/1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.
15. Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). Constraining the search for structure in the input. Lingua, 106, 197–218.
16. Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants' detection of sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1–23.
17. Kager, R., Pater, J., & Zonneveld, W. (2004). Constraints in phonological acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kaye, J. (1989). Phonology: A cognitive view. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Kiparsky, P., & Menn, L. (1977). On the acquisition of phonology. In J. MacNamara (Ed.), Language and thought (pp. 47–78). New York: Academic Press.
20. Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. PNAS 97, 11850–11857.
21. Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–608.
22. Lahiri, A. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 245-294.
23. Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002). Underspecified recognition. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 637–676). Berlin: Mouton.
24. Levelt, C. C. (1994). On the acquisition of place. Doctoral dissertation University of Leiden, HIL Dissertations 8. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
25. Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Spoken word recognition. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 265–301). New York: Academic Press.
26. MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (2000). Origin of the internal structure of word forms. Science, 288, 527–531.
27. Paradis, C., & Prunet, J.–F. (1991). Phonetics and phonology. Vol. 2. The special status of coronals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Manuscript University of Rutgers & University of Colorado at Boulder.
29. Smith, N. V. (1973). Acquisition of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381–382.
31. Steriade, D. (1995). Underspecification and markedness. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 114–174). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
32. Tincoff, R., & Jusczyk, P. (1996). Are word–final consonants perceptually salient for infants? Poster presented at the Fifth Conference on Laboratory Phonology.
33. Waterson, N. (1981). A tentative developmental model of phonological representation. In T. Myers, J. Laver & J Anderson (Eds.), The cognitive representation of speech. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34. Werker, J. F., Fennell, C. T., Corcoran, K., & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants' ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3, 1–30.
35. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.