Using Snowball-Based Methods in Hidden Populations to Generate a Randomized Community Sample of Gang-Affiliated Adolescents

Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 151-167

  Petersen, Rebecca D ^a   Valdez, Avelardo ^b  

^a KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

adolescents; females; gangs; girls; juvenile; Mexican Americans; research methods; sampling; youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247667297     PISSN: 15412040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1541204004273316     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Akins, C., & Beschner, G. (1980). Ethnography: A research tool for policymakers in the drug and alcohol fields. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
2. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update (No. 33). Guildford, UK: University of Surrey, Department of Sociology.
3. Bandura, A., & Menlove, F. L. (1968). Factors determining vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior through symbolic modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 99-108.
4. Berk, R. A., & Ray, S. C. (1982). Selection biases in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386-398.
5. Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10, 141-163.
6. Bjerregaard, B. (2002). Self-definitions of gang membership and involvement in delinquent activities. Youth & Society, 34, 31-54.
7. Boys, A., Marsden, J., & Strang, J. (2001). Understanding reasons for drug use amongst young people: A functional perspective. Health Education Research, 16, 457-469.
8. Braunstein, M. S. (1993). Sampling a hidden population: Noninstitutionalized drug users. AIDS Education and Research, 5, 131-139.
9. Burgess, R. G. (1991). Sponsors, gatekeepers, members, and friends: Access in educational settings. In W. B. Shaffir & R. B. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research. (pp. 43-52). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Campbell, A. (1984). Girls in the gang. New York: Basil Blackwell.
11. Cepeda, A., & Valdez, A. (2003). Risk behaviors among young Mexican American gang-associated females: Sexual relations, partying, substance use, and crime. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 90-106.
12. Clear, T. R., Rose, D. R., & Ryder, J. A. (2001). Incarceration and the community: The problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime and Delinquency, 47, 335-351.
13. Codina, E., Kaplan, C. D., Yin, Z., Valdez, A., & Mata, A. (1999). Estimating the extent of injecting heroin use in Laredo, Texas. Journal of Border Health, 4, 3-11.
14. Curry, G. D., & Spergel, I. A. (1988). Gang homicide, delinquency, and community. Criminology, 26, 381-405.
15. Decker, S., & VanWinkle, D. (1996). Life in the gang: Family, friends and violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Deschenes, E. P., & Esbensen, F. A. (1999). Violence and gangs: Gender differences in perceptions and behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 63-96.
17. Dunlap, E., & Johnson, B. D. (1996). Family and human resources in development of a female crackseller career: Case study of a hidden population. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 175-198.
18. Dunlap, E., & Johnson, B. D. (1999). Gaining access to hidden populations: Strategies for gaining cooperation of drug sellers/dealers and their families in ethnographic research. Drugs and Society, 14, 127-149.
19. Esbensen, F., & Deschenes, E. P. (1998). A multi-site examination of gang membership: Does gender matter? Criminology, 36, 799-828.
20. Esbensen, F., Deschenes, E. P., & Winfree, L. T. (1999). Differences between gang girls and gang boys: Results from a multi-site survey. Youth & Society, 31, 27-53.
21. Esbensen, F., Miller, M. H., Taylor, T. J., He, N., & Freng, A. (1999). Differential attrition rates and active parental consent. Evaluation Review, 23, 316-335.
22. Esbensen, F., Winfree, L. T., He, N., & Taylor, T. (2001). Young gangs and definitional issues: When is a gang a gang, and why does it matter? Crime and Delinquency, 47, 105-130.
23. Fagan, J. (1989). The social organization of drug use and drug dealing among urban gangs. Criminology, 27, 633-669.
24. Faugier, J., & Sargeant, M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 790-797.
25. Fitzgerald, J. L. (1996). Hidden populations and the gaze of power. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 5-21.
26. Fitzgerald, J. L., & Hamilton, M. (1997). Confidentiality, disseminated regulation and ethico-legal liabilities in research with a hidden population of illicit drug users. Addiction, 92, 1099-1108.
27. Fleisher, M. S. (1998). Dead end kids: Gang girls and the boys they know. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
28. Frank, O., & Snijders, T. (1994). Estimating the size of hidden populations using snowball sampling. Journal of Official Statistics, 10, 53-67.
29. Griffiths, P., Gossop, M., Powis, B., & Strang, J. (1993). Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: Methodological and practical issues. Addiction, 88, 1617-1626.
30. Groger, L., Mayberry, P., & Straker, J. (1999). What we didn’t learn because of who would not talk to us. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 829-835.
31. Hagedorn, J. M. (1996). The Emperor's new clothes: Theory and method in gang field research. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 24, 111-122.
32. Harris, M. C. (1994). Cholas, Mexican-American girls, and gangs. Sex Roles, 30, 289-301.
33. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64-105.
34. Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174-199.
35. Heckathorn, D. D. (2002). Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems, 49, 11-34.
36. Heckathorn, D. D., Broadhead, R. S., & Sergeyev, B. (2001). A methodology for reducing respondent duplication and impersonation in samples of hidden populations. Journal of Drugs Issues, 31, 543-564.
37. Horowitz, R. (1983). Honor and the American dream: Culture and identity in a Chicano Community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38. Horowitz, R. (1990). Sociological perspectives on gangs: Conflicting definitions and concepts. In R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 37-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Jacobs, B. A. (1999). Crack to heroin? Drug markets and transition. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 555-574.
40. Joe, K. L., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1995). ‘Just every mother's angel’: An analysis of ethnic and gender variations in youth gang membership. Gender & Society, 9, 409-431.
41. Kaplan, C. D., Korf, D., & Sterk, C. (1987). Temporal and social contexts of heroin-using populations: An illustration of the snowball sampling technique. Journal of Mental and Nervous Disorders, 175, 566-574.
42. Klein, M. C. (1995). The American street gang: Its nature, prevalence, and control. New York: Oxford University.
43. Kuebler, D., Hausser, D., & Gervasoni, J. (2000). The characteristics of “new users” of cocaine and heroin unknown to treatment agencies: Results from the Swiss Hidden Population Study. Addiction, 95, 1561-1571.
44. Laidler, K. J., & Hunt, G. (2001). Accomplishing femininity among the girls in the gang. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 656-678.
45. Miller, J. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs, and gender. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Miller, W. B. (1975). Violence by youth gangs and youth groups as a crime problem in major American cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47. Moore, J. W. (1977). A case study of collaboration: The Chicano Pinto Research Project. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 144-158.
48. Moore, J. W. (1978). Homeboys: Gangs, drugs, and prisons in the barrio of Los Angeles. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
49. Moore, J. W. (1991). Going down to the barrio: Homeboys and homegirls in Change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
50. Moore, J. W., & Hagedorn, J. (2001). Female gangs: A focus on research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
51. Morgan, P. (1996). Unknown, unexplored, and unseen populations: An introduction into the truly hidden worlds of drugs and alcohol research. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 1-4.
52. Penrod, J., Preston, D. B., Cain, R. E., & Starks, M. T. (2003). A discussion of chain referral as a method of sampling hard-to-reach populations. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 14, 100-108.
53. Petersen, R. D. (2000a). Definitions of a gang and impacts on public policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 139-149.
54. Petersen, R. D. (2000b). Gangs and inmate subcultures of female youth. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 20, 100-116.
55. Petersen, R. D. (2003, November). Family and intimate violence among females in gangs. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.
56. Petersen, R. D., & Valdez, A. (2000, November). Sexual and intimate partner violence among Mexican American female adolescents. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology annual meeting, San Francisco, CA.
57. Petersen, R. D., & Valdez, A. (2002, November). Understanding gang-affiliated adolescent females: Developing a typology. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology annual meeting, Chicago, IL.
58. Petersen, R. D., & Valdez, A. (2004). Intimate partner violence among Hispanic females. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2, 67-89.
59. Peterson, D., Miller, J., & Esbensen, F. (2001). The impact of sex composition on gangs and gang member delinquency. Criminology, 39, 411-439.
60. Pettiway, L. E. (1995). Copping crack: The travel behavior of crack users. Justice Quarterly, 12, 499-524.
61. Schunk, D. H., Hanson, A. R., & Cox, P. D. (1987). Peer model attributes and children's achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 54-61.
62. Shaffir, W. B. (1991). Managing a convincing self-presentation: Some personal reflections on entering the field. In W. B. Shaffir & R. B. Stebbins (Eds.), Experiencing fieldwork: An inside view of qualitative research (pp. 72-81). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63. Simcha-Fagan, O., & Schwartz, J. E. (1986). Neighborhood and delinquency: An assessment of contextual effects. Criminology, 24, 667-699.
64. Snijders, T. (1992). Estimation on the basis of snowball samples: How to weight. Bulletin Methodologie Sociologique, 36, 59-70.
65. Spergel, I. A. (1995). The youth gang problem: A community approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Tabnak, F., & Sun, R. (2000). Need for HIV/AIDS early identification and preventative measures among middle-aged and elderly women. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 287-288.
67. Thompson, S. K., & Collins, L. M. (2002). Adaptive sampling in research on risk-related behaviors. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, S57-S67.
68. Thompson, S. K., & Seber, G. A. F. (1997). Adaptive sampling. New York: John Wiley.
69. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). United States Census 2000. Retrieved November, 11, 2003, from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html
70. Valdez, A., & Kaplan, C. D. (1999). Reducing selection bias in the use of focus groups to investigate hidden populations: The case of Mexican-American gang members from South Texas. Drugs and Society, 14, 209-224.
71. Valdez, A., Kaplan, C. D., & Codina, E. (2000). Psychopathy among Mexican American gang members: A comparative study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 46-58.
72. VanMeter, K. (1990). Methodological and design issues: Techniques for assessing the representatives of snowball samples. National Institute of Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series, 9, 31-43.
73. Wang, J. Z. (2000). Female gang affiliation: Knowledge and perceptions of at-risk girls. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 618-632.
74. Watters, J. K. (1993). The significance of sampling and understanding hidden populations. Drugs & Society, 7, 13-22.
75. Watters, J. K., & Biernacki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 26, 416-430.
76. Wiebel, W. W. (1990). Identifying and gaining access to hidden populations. In E. Y. Lambert (Ed.), The collection and interpretation of data from hidden populations (Research Monograph No. 098., 4-11). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
77. Willems, J. C., Iguchi, M. Y., Lidz, V., & Bux, D. A. (1997). Change in drug-using networks of injecting drug users during methadone treatment: Pilot study using snowball recruitment and intensive interviews. Substance Use and Misuse, 32, 1539-1554.
78. Williams, J. H., Pierce, R., Young, N. S., & VanDorn, R. (2001). Service utilization in high-crime communities: Consumer views on supports and barriers. Families in Society, 82, 409-417.
79. Winship, C., & Mare, R. (1992). Models for selection bias. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 327-350.
80. Wright, R., & Decker, S. H. (1997). Armed robbers in action. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
81. Wright, R., Decker, S. H., Redfern, A. K., & Smith, D. L. (1992). A snowball's chance in hell: Doing fieldwork with active residential burglars. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 148-161.
82. Yin, Z., Valdez, A., Mata, A. G., & Kaplan, C. (1996). Developing a field-intensive methodology for generating a randomized sample for gang research. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 24, 195-204.
83. Zatz, M. S., & Portillos, E. L. (2000). Voices from the barrio: Chicano/a gangs, families, and communities. Criminology, 38, 369-401.