Digitized hand-wrist radiographs: Comparison of subjective and software-derived image quality at various compression ratios

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 131, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 679-688

  McCord, Layne K ^a   Scarfe, William C ^b   Naylor, Rachel H ^c   Scheetz, James P ^d   Silveira, Anibal ^b   Gillespie, Kevin R ^e  

^a School of Dentistry   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Maysville   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^e US Army ^*  (Iraq)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DETERMINATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HAND; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; WRIST;

AGE DETERMINATION BY SKELETON; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HAND; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; WRIST;

EID: 34247641658     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.032     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Fishman L.S. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod 52 (1982) 88-112
2. Greulich W.W., and Pyle S.I. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. (1959), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, Calif
3. Bergersen E.O. The male adolescent facial growth spurt: its prediction and relation to skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod 42 (1972) 319-338
4. Wenzel A., Gotfredsen E., Borg E., and Grondahl H.G. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 81 (1996) 351-355
5. Yuasa H., Ariji Y., and Ohki M. Joint Photographic Experts Group compression of intraoral radiographs for image transmission on the World Wide Web. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88 (1999) 93-99
6. Janhom A., Van der Stelt P.F., Van Ginkel F.C., and Geraets W.G. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28 (1999) 6-12
7. Piraino D.W., Davros W.J., Lieber M., Richmond B.J., Schils J.P., Recht M.P., et al. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison. Am J Roentgenol 172 (1999) 177-184
8. Jonsson A., Borg A., Hannesson P., Herrlin K., Jonsson K., Sloth M., et al. Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand: an ROC analysis. Acta Radiol 35 (1994) 311-318
9. Genant H.K., Jiang Y., Peterfy C., Lu Y., Redei J., and Countryman P.J. Assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using a modified scoring method on digitized and original radiographs. Arthritis Rheum 41 (2001) 1583-1590
10. Van der Jagt E.J., Hofman S., Kraft B.M., and van Leeuwen M.A. Can we see enough?. A comparative study of film-screen vs. digital radiographs in small lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Radiol 10 (2000) 304-307
11. Arbillaga H.O., Montgomery G.P., Cabarrus L.P., Watson M.M., Martin L., and Edworthy S.M. Internet hand x-rays: a comparison of joint space narrowing and erosion scores (Sharp/Genant) of plain versus digitized x-rays in rheumatoid arthritis patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 3 (2002) 13 Epub 2002 Apr 30
12. Hofstetter H., and Voegeli E. ROC comparison of visualization of hand fractures using digital and conventional techniques. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 167 (1997) 274-279
13. Bramble J.M., Cook L.T., Murphey M.D., Martin N.L., Anderson W.H., and Hensley K.S. Image data compression in magnification hand radiographs. Radiology 170 (1989) 133-136
14. Sayre J., Bruce H., Boechat M., Hall T., and Huang H.K. Subperiosteal resorption: effect of full-frame image compression of hand-radiographs on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 185 (1992) 599-603
15. Toney M.O., Dominguez R., Dao H.N., and Simmons G. The effect of lossy discrete cosine transform compression on subtle bone fractures. J Digit Imaging 10 (1997) 169-173
16. Uchida K., Watanabe H., Aoki T., Nakamura K., and Nakata H. Clinical evaluation of irreversible data compression for computed radiography of the hand. J Digit Imaging 11 (1998) 121-125
17. Wang Z. A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Process Letters 9 (2002) 81-84
18. Eskicioglu A. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 2000;4:1907-10.
19. Eskicioglu A.M., Fisher P.S., and Chen S. Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Transactions on Communications 43 (1995) 2959-2965
20. Image Quality Measure Computer Program, IQM version 6.2, Mitre, Bedford, Mass. Available at: http://www.mitre.org/tech/mtf/. Accessed October 14, 2005.
21. Schulze R.K., Rosing S., and d'Hoedt B. Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94 (2002) 388-394
22. Chen S.K., and Hollender L. Digitizing of radiographs with a flatbed scanner. J Dent 23 (1995) 205-208
23. Nill N.B., and Bouzas B.H. Objective image quality measure derived from digital image power spectra. Opt Eng 31 (1994) 813-825
24. Landis J., and Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1997) 159-174
25. Przelaskowski A. Vector quality measure of lossy compressed medical images. Comput Biol Med 34 (2004) 193-207