Cross-sectional area of lumbar vertebrae in peri- and postmenopausal patients with and without osteoporosis

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 304-309

  Link, Thomas Marc ^b   Doren M ^a   Lewing, G ^c   Meier, N ^c   Heinecke, A ^c   Rummeny, E ^c  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Lumbar vertebrae, area; Osteoporosis; Quantitative computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; CORTICAL BONE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FRACTURE; HUMAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENOPAUSE; OSTEOPENIA; OSTEOPOROSIS; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRABECULAR BONE;

ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; AREA UNDER CURVE; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FRACTURES, SPONTANEOUS; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPINAL FRACTURES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0343090899     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001980070118     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D. Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech 1988;Suppl 1:S1-23.
2. Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D. Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech 1989; 4 (Suppl 2):S1-27.
3. Gilsanz V, Loro ML, Roe TF, Sayre J, Gilsanz R, Schulz EE. Vertebral size in elderly women with osteoporosis: mechanical implications and relationship to fractures J Clin Invest 1990;95:2332-7.
4. Gilsanz V, Boechat M, Roe T, Loro M, Sayre J, Goodman W. Gender differences in vertebral body sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. Radiology 1994;190:678-82.
5. Leifke E, Körner H, Link T, Behre H, Peters P, Nieschlag E. Effects of testosterone replacement therapy on cortical and trabecular bone mineral density, vertebral body area, and paraspinal muscle area in hypogonadal men. Eur J Endocrinol 1998;138:51-8.
6. Davis J, Grove J, Wasnich R, Ross P. Spatial relationships between prevalent and incident spine fractures. Bone 1999;24:261-4.
7. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137-48.
8. WHO. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a report of a WHO study group. Technical report 843. Geneva: WHO, 1994.
9. Felsenberg D, Gowin W. Knochendichtemessung mit Zwei-Spektren-Methoden. Radiologe 1999;39:186-93.
10. Montag M, Dören M, Meyer-Galander H, Montag T, Peters P. Computertomographisch bestimmter Mineralgehalt in der LWS-Spongiosa. Radiologe 1988;28:161-5.
11. Steiger P, Block J, Steiger S. Spinal bone mineral density measured with quantitative CT: effect of region of interest, vertebral level and techniques. Radiology 1990;175:537-43.
12. Consensus development conference. Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993;94:646-50.
13. Biggemann M, Hilweg D, Brinckmann P. Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 1988;17:264-9.
14. Meier N, Link T, Fiebich M, Bick U, Lenzen H, Peters P. Digital bone structure analysis from computer tomographs of the human lumbar spine. Computer assisted radiology. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1995:67-73.
15. Waldt S, Meier N, Renger B, Lenzen H, Fiebich M, Rummeny E, et al. Strukturanalyse hochauflösender Computertomogramme als ergänzendes Verfahren in der Osteoporosediagnostik: In vitro Untersuchungen an Wirbelsäulensegmenten. Fortschr Rontgenstr 1999;71:136-42.
16. Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Mautalen C, Rey Valzacchi G, Scaglia H, Zylberstein C. Bone mineral density and bone size in men with primary osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1997;62:465-9.
17. Seeman E. Growth in bone mass and size: are racial and gender differences in bone mineral density more apparent than real? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:1414-9.
18. Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L. Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals. Bone 1990;11:67-73.
19. Meier N, Brinkhaus HA, Brinkmann P, Peters PE. Digital bone structure analysis. SCAR 94: Computer applications to assist radiology. Carlsbad Symposia Foundation 1994:670-5.
20. Ito M, Ohki M, Hayashi K, Yamada M, Uetani M, Nakamura T. Relationship of spinal fracture to bone density, textural and anthropometric parameters. Calcif Tissue Int 1997;60:240-3.
21. Ito M, Hayashi K, Uetani M, Yamada M, Ohki M, Nakamura T. Association between anthropometric measures and spinal bone mineral density. Invest Radiol 1994;29:812-6.
22. Ross P, Huang C, Davis J, Wasnich R. Vertebral dimension measurements improve prediction of vertebral fracture incidence. Bone 1995;16(4 Suppl):S257-62.
23. Takada M, Wu C, Lang T, Genant H. Vertebral fracture assessment using the lateral scoutview of computed tomography in comparison with radiographs. Osteoporos Int 1998;8:197-203.
24. Kalender W, Felsenberg D, Louis O, Lopez P, Klotz E, Osteaux, M, et al. Reference values for trabecular and cortical vertebral bone density in single and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 1989;9:75-80.