Spatial structure and mating system in wild cherry (Prunus avium) population

Biologia

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 117-123

  Gömöry, Dusan ^a   Paule, Ladislav ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN ZVOLEN   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Mating system; Prunus avium; Spatial autocorrelation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041983041     PISSN: 00063088     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. CHELIAK, W. M., MORGAN, K., STROBECK, C., YEH, F. C. H. & DANCIK, B. P. 1983. Estimation of mating system parameters in plant populations using the EM algorithm. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 65: 157-161.
2. CHELIAK, W. M. & PITEL, J. A. 1984. Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from forest tree species. Information Report PI-X-42, Petawawa National Forest Institute, Chalk River.
3. Ducci, F. & PROIETTI, R. 1997. Variabiliti alloeznimatica nel ciliegio selvatico (Prunus avium L.) in Italia. Ann. 1st. Sper. Selv. 25: 81-104.
4. FEKETE, L. & BLATTNY, T. 1913. Die Verbreitung der forstlich wichtigen Bäume und Sträucher im ungarischen Staate. Commissionsverlag A. Joerges Witwe & Sohn, Selmecbânya, 433 -l- 160 pp.
5. FRASCARIA, N., SANTI, F. fc GOUYON, P. H. 1993. Genetic differentiation within and among popula-tions of chestnut (Castanea saliva Mill.) and wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Heredity 70: 634-641.
6. GKBURKK, T. 1993. Zur Analyse der genetischen Architektur von Waldbeständen anhand räumlicher Autokorrelationen. Allg. Forst- u. Jagdztg. 164: 137-144.
7. HAMRICK, .). L., GODT, J. W. & SHERMAN-BROYLES. S. L. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6: 95124.
8. KAURISCH, P. HACKENBERG, E.M., GRUPPE, W. fo KöHLER, W. 1989. Enzympolymorphismen bei Kirscharten (Prunus spp.) der Sektion Eucerasus, Pfieudocerasus und Mahaleb. Angewandte Botanik 63: 533-542.
9. KAURISCH. P. THROLL, M., GRUPPE, W. & KöHLER, \V. 1991. Fnzympolymorphismen bei Sü- (Prunus amuin) und Sauerkirschen (P. cerasus): Kultursortendifferenzierung. Angewandte Botanik 65: 3543.
10. KNOWLES, P., PERRY, D. J. & FORSTER, H. A. 1992. Spatial genetic structure in two tamarack (Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch) populations with different establishment histories. Evolution 46: 572576.
11. I.F.ONAHDI, S. & MENOZZI, P. 1996. Spatial structure of genetic variability in natural stands of Fagus sylvatica L. (beech) in Italy. Heredity 77: 359-368.
12. PAULE, L. 1996. Gene conservation in European beech (Fayus sylvatica L.). Forest Genetics 2: 161-170.
13. PERRY. D. J. & KNOWLES, P. 1992. Spatial genetic structure within three sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) stands. Heredity 66: 137-142.
14. RITLAND, K. 1984. The effective proportion of selffertilization with consanguineous matings in inbred populations. Genetics 106: 139-152.
15. ROUSSET, F. &: RAYMOND, M. 1995. Testing hétérozygote excess and deficiency. Genetics 140: 14131419.
16. SANTI, F. 1991. Inheritance of six enzymatic loci of wild cherries (Prunus avium L.), p. 221-226. In: FINESCHI, S., MALVOLTI, M. E., CANNATA, F. fe HATTEMER, H. H. (eds), Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague.
17. SANTI, F. & LEMOINE, M. 1990. Genetic markers for Prunus avium L.: inheritance and linkage of isozyme loci. Annales des Sciences Forestit'res 47: 131-139.
18. SCHNABEL, A fr. HAMRICK, J. L. 1990. Organization of genetic diversity within and among populations of Gleditschia triacanthos (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 77: 1060-1069.
19. SHAPCOTT, A. 1995. The spatial genetic structure in natural populations of the Australian temperate rainforest tree Aihcrosperma moschatum. Heredity 74: 28-38.
20. SOKAL, R. R. fc ODEN, N. L. 1978. Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. Biol. Journal of the Linnean Society 10: 199-228.
21. TUROK, J., ERIKSSON, G., KLEINSCHMIT, J. & GANGER, S. (compilers) 1996. EUFORGEN. Noble Hardwoods Network. Report of the first meeting, 24-27 March 1996, Escherode. IPGRI, Rome, 172 pp.