Fine-scale genetic structure of bull trout at the southern limit of their distribution

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 135, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1238-1253

  Whiteley, Andrew R ^a   Spruell, Paul ^a   Rieman, Bruce E ^b   Allendorf, Fred W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b USDA Forest Service Boise Aquatic Sciences Lab   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION ESTIMATION; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; RIVER BASIN; SALMONID;

BOISE RIVER; IDAHO; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

SALMONIDAE; SALVELINUS CONFLUENTUS;

EID: 34247612902     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T05-166.1     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allendorf, F. W., R. F. Leary, P. Spruell, and J. K. Wenburg. 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:613-622.
2. Beebee, T. J. C., and G. Rowe. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of natterjack toad Bufo calamita Laurenti populations: consequences of dispersal from a Pleistocene refugium. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69:367-381.
3. Belkhir, K. 1999. GENETIX 4.0. Laboratoire genome, populations interactions. CNRS UPR 9060, Montpellier, France.
4. Bohonak, A. J. 2003. IBD (isolation by distance): a program for analyses of isolation by distance. Journal of Heredity 92:153-154.
5. Bouza, C., J. Arias, J. Castro, L. Sanchez, and P. Martinez. 1999. Genetic structure of brown trout, Salmo trutta L., at the southern limit of the distribution range of the anadromous form. Molecular Ecology 8:1991-2001.
6. Carlsson, J., and J. Nilsson. 2000. Population genetic structure of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) within a northern boreal forest stream. Hereditas 132:173-181.
7. Castric, V., and L. Bernatchez. 2003. The rise and fall of isolation by distance in anadromous brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill). Genetics 165:983-996.
8. Castric, V., and L. Bernatchez. 2004. Individual assignment test reveals differential restriction to dispersal between two salmonids despite no increase of genetic differences with distance. Molecular Ecology 13:1299-1312.
9. Castric, V., F. Bonney, and L. Bernatchez. 2001. Landscape structure and hierarchical genetic diversity in the brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. Evolution 55:1016-1028.
10. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21:550-570.
11. Chapman, R. W., G. R. Sedberry, C. C. Koenig, and B. M. Eleby. 1999. Stock identification of gag, Mycteroperca microlepis, along the southeast coast of the United States. Marine Biotechnology 1:127-146.
12. Costello, A. B., T. E. Down, S. M. Pollard, C. J. Pacas, and E. B. Taylor. 2003. The influence of history and contemporary stream hydrology on the evolution of genetic diversity within species: an examination of microsatellite DNA variation in bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus (Pisces: Salmonidae). Evolution 57:328-344.
13. Dunham, J. B., and B. E. Rieman. 1999. Metapopulation structure of bull trout: influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecological Applications 9:642-655.
14. Dunham, J. B., B. E. Rieman, and J. T. Peterson. 2002. Patch-based models to predict species occurrence: lessons from salmonid fishes in streams. Pages 327-334 in J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. Morrison, M. Raphael, J. Haulfer, and B. Wall, editors. Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Island Press, Covelo, California.
15. Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse, and J. M. Quattro. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479-491.
16. Felsenstein, J. 1992. PHYLIP (phytogeny inference package), version 3.5c. Seattle, Washington.
17. Gaggiotti, O. E., O. Lange, K. Rassmann, and C. Gliddon. 1999. A comparison of two indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology 8:1513-1520.
18. Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT, version 2.9.3. A program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Available: www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/ fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995).
19. Goudet, J., M. Raymond, T. Demeeus, and F. Rousset. 1996. Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 144:1933-1940.
20. Heino, M., and I. Hanski. 2001. Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. American Naturalist 157:495-511.
21. Hutchison, D. W. 2003. Testing the central/peripheral model: analyses of microsatellite variability in the eastern collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris collaris). American Midland Naturalist 149:148-162.
22. Hutchison, D. W., and A. R. Templeton. 1999. Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53:1898-1914.
23. Kalinowski, S. T. 2002. How many alleles per locus should be used to estimate genetic distances? Heredity 88:62-65.
24. Kanda, N., and F. W. Allendorf. 2001. Genetic population structure of bull trout from the Flathead River Basin as shown by microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA markers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:92-106.
25. Keyghobadi, N., J. Roland, and C. Strobeck. 1999. Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae). Molecular Ecology 8:1481-1495.
26. Montgomery, D. R., E. M. Beamer, G. R. Pess, and T. P. Quinn. 1999. Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:377-387.
27. Morita, K., and S. Yamamoto. 2002. Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on the persistence of stream-dwelling charr populations. Conservation Biology 16:1318-1323.
28. Neraas, L. P., and P. Spruell. 2001. Fragmentation of riverine systems: the genetic effects of dams on bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Clark Fork River system. Molecular Ecology 10:1153-1164.
29. Poissant, J., T. W. Knight, and M. M. Ferguson. 2005. Nonequilibrium conditions following landscape rearrangement: the relative contribution of past and current hydrological landscapes on the genetic structure of a stream-dwelling fish. Molecular Ecology 14:1321-1331.
30. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652-661.
31. Quinn, T. P. 2005. The Behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
32. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version 3.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86:248-249.
33. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
34. Rieman, B. E., and J. B. Dunham. 2000. Metapopulations and salmonids: a synthesis of life history patterns and empirical observations. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 9:51-64.
35. Rieman, B. E., D. C. Lee, and R. F. Thurow. 1997. Distribution, status, and likely future trends of bull trout within the Columbia River and Klamath basins. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:1111-1125.
36. Rieman, B. E., and J. D. McIntyre. 1995. Occurrence of bull trout in naturally fragmented habitat patches of varied size. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:285-296.
37. Schneider, S., D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin, version 2.001. A software for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
38. Schwartz, M. K., L. S. Mills, Y. Ortega, L. F. Ruggiero, and F. W. Allendorf. 2003. Landscape location affects genetic variation of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis). Molecular Ecology 12:1807-1816.
39. Spruell, P., M. L. Bartron, N. Kanda, and F. W. Allendorf. 2001. Detection of hybrids between bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) using PCR primers complementary to interspersed nuclear elements. Copeia 2001:1093-1099.
40. Spruell, P., A. R. Hemmingsen, P. J. Howell, N. Kanda, and F. W. Allendorf. 2003. Conservation genetics of bull trout: geographic distribution of variation at microsatellite loci. Conservation Genetics 4:17-29.
41. Spruell, P., B. E. Rieman, K. L. Knudsen, F. M. Utter, and F. W. Allendorf. 1999. Genetic population structure within streams: microsatellite analysis of bull trout populations. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 8:114-121.
42. Stamford, M. D., and E. B. Taylor. 2004. Phylogeographic lineages of Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in North America: divergence, origins and affinities with Eurasian Thymallus. Molecular Ecology 13:1533-1549.
43. Takezaki, N., and M. Nei. 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144:389-399.
44. Taylor, E. B., S. Pollard, and D. Louie. 1999. Mitochondrial DNA variation in bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) from northwestern North America: implications for zoogeography and conservation. Molecular Ecology 8:1155-1170.
45. Vrijenhoek, R. C., M. E. Douglas, and G. K. Meffe. 1985. Conservation genetics of endangered fish populations in Arizona. Science 229:400-401.
46. Vucetich, J. A., and T. A. Waite. 2003. Spatial patterns of demography and genetic processes across the species' range: null hypotheses for landscape conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics 4:639-645.
47. Waples, R. S. 1989. Temporal variation in allele frequencies: testing the right hypothesis. Evolution 43:1236-1251.
48. Weir, B. S., and C. C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
49. Whiteley, A. R., P. Spruell, and F. W. Allendorf. 2004. Ecological and life history characteristics predict population genetic divergence of two salmonids in the same landscape. Molecular Ecology 13:3675-3688.
50. Wofford, J. E. B., R. E. Gresswell, and M. A. Banks. 2005. Influence of barriers to movement on within-watershed genetic variation of coastal cutthroat trout. Ecological Applications 15:628-637.
51. Yamamoto, S., K. Morita, I. Koizumi, and K. Maekawa. 2004. Genetic differentiation of white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis) populations after habitat fragmentation: spatial-temporal changes in gene frequencies. Conservation Genetics 5:529-538.