Evaluating passive integrated transponder tags for marking mottled sculpins: Effects on growth and mortality

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 135, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1456-1461

  Ruetz III, Carl R ^a   Earl, Brendan M ^b   Kohler, Steven L ^b  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY MASS; BODY SIZE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FISH; GROWTH RATE; MORTALITY; SAMPLING; TAGGING;

COTTUS BAIRDII;

EID: 34247607408     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T05-295.1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baras, E., L. Westerloppe, C. Mélard, J.-C. Philippart, and V. Bénech. 1999. Evaluation of implantation procedures for PIT-tagging juvenile Nile tilapia. North American Journal of Aquaculture 61:246-251.
2. Baras, E., C. Malbrouck, M. Houbart, P. Kestemont, and C. Mélard. 2000. The effect of PIT tags on growth and physiology of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size. Aquaculture 185:159-173.
3. Brown, R. S., S. J. Cooke, W. G. Anderson, and R. S. McKinley. 1999. Evidence to challenge the "2% rule" for biotelemetry. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:867-871.
4. Bruyndoncx, L., G. Knaepkens, W. Meeus, L. Bervoets, and M. Eens. 2002. The evaluation of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags and visible implant elastomer (VIE) marks as new marking techniques for the bullhead. Journal of Fish Biology 60:260-262.
5. Bubb, D. H., M. C. Lucas, T. J. Thom, and P. Rycroft. 2002. The potential use of PIT telemetry for identifying and tracking crayfish in their natural environment. Hydrobiologia 483:225-230.
6. Busacker, G. P., I. R. Adelman, and E. M. Goolish. 1990. Growth. Pages 363-387 in C. B. Shreck and P. B. Moyle, editors. Methods for fish biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
7. Cooke, S. J., S. G. Hinch, M. Wikelski, R. D. Andrews, L. J. Kuchel, T. G. Wolcott, and P. J. Butler. 2004. Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:334-343.
8. Cucherousset, J., J.-M. Roussel, R. Keeler, R. A. Cunjak, and R. Stump. 2005. The use of two new portable 12-mm PIT tag detectors to track small fish in shallow streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:270-274.
9. Cunjak, R. A., J.-M. Roussel, M. A. Gray, J. P. Dietrich, D. F. Cartwright, K. R. Munkittrick, and T. D. Jardine. 2005. Using stable isotope analysis with telemetry or mark-recapture data to identify fish movement and foraging. Oecologia 114:636-646.
10. Dahl, J. 1998. Effects of a benthivorous and a drift-feeding fish on a benthic stream assemblage. Oecologia 116:426-432.
11. Gibbons, J. W., and K. M. Andrews. 2004. PIT tagging: simple technology at its best. Bioscience 54:447-454.
12. Gries, G., and B. H. Letcher. 2002. Tag retention and survival of age-0 Atlantic salmon following surgical implantation with passive integrated transponder tags. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:219-222.
13. Knaepkens, G., L. Bruyndoncx, and M. Eens. 2004. Assessment of residency and movement of the endangered bullhead (Cottus gobio) in two Flemish rivers. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 13:317-322.
14. Kohler, S. L., and M. A. McPeek. 1989. Predation risk and the foraging behavior of competing stream insects. Ecology 70:1811-1825.
15. Littell, R. C., J. Pendergast, and R. Natarajan. 2000. Modelling covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine 19:1793-1819.
16. McCormick, M. I., and S. Smith. 2004. Efficacy of passive integrated transponder tags to determine spawning-site visitations by a tropical fish. Coral Reefs 23:570-577.
17. Miyasaka, H., and S. Nakano. 1999. Effects of drift- and benthic-foraging fish on the drift dispersal of three species of mayfly nymphs in a Japanese stream. Oecologia 118:99-106.
18. Nielsen, L. A. 1992. Methods for marking fish and shellfish. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 23, Bethesda, Maryland.
19. Ombredane, D., J. L. Baglinière, and F. Marchand. 1998. The effects of passive integrated transponder tags on survival and growth of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) and their use for studying movement in a small river. Hydrobiologia 371/372:99-106.
20. Prentice, E. F., T. A. Flagg, and C. S. McCutcheon. 1990. Feasibility of using implantable passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in salmonids. Pages 317-322 in N. C. Parker, A. E. Giorgi, R. C. Heidinger, D. B. Jester, Jr., E. D. Prince, and G. A. Winans, editors. Fish-marking techniques. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 7, Bethesda, Maryland.
21. Quartararo, N., and J. D. Bell. 1992. Effect of intraperitoneal passive implantable transponder (PIT) tags on the growth and survival of juvenile snapper, Pagrus auratus (Bloch and Schneider). Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 23:543-548.
22. Roussel, J.-M., A. Haro, and R. A. Cunjak. 2000. Field test of a new method for tracking small fishes in shallow rivers using passive integrated transponder (PIT) technology. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:1326-1329.
23. Ruetz, C. R., III, A. L. Hurford, and B. Vondracek. 2003. Interspecific interactions between brown trout and slimy sculpin in stream enclosures. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:611-618.
24. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
25. Schaalje, G. B., J. B. McBride, and G. W. Fellingham. 2002. Adequacy of approximations to distributions of test statistics in complex mixed linear models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 7:512-524.
26. Scott, W. B., and E. J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 183.
27. Skalski, G. T., and J. F. Gilliam. 2000. Modeling diffusive spread in a heterogeneous population: a movement study with stream fish. Ecology 81:1685-1700.
28. Zydlewski, G. B., A. Haro, K. G. Whalen, and S. D. McCormick. 2001. Performance of stationary and portable passive transponder detection systems for monitoring of fish movements. Journal of Fish Biology 58:1471-1475.