Effect of the inclusion of food waste in pig diets on growth performance, carcass and meat quality

Animal

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 595-599

  Marquez M C ^a   Ramos, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Feed composition; Food waste; Meat quality; Pigs

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CARCASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; FISH; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD QUALITY; FRUIT; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 34247601442     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731107685000     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2000. Official method s of analysis, 17th ed. Official method 996.06. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
2. Boda K 1990. Non-conventional feedstuffs in the nutrition of farm animals. Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam.
3. Carty G 2003. Biodegradable municipal waste management in Europe. The Parliamentary Sustainable Waste Group and Environmental Services Association. Topic Report 28 January 2003. Terrace Marquee, House of Commons, Westminster.
4. Esteban MB, García AJ, Ramos P and Márquez MC 2007. Evaluation of fruit-vegetable and fish wastes as alternative feedstuffs in pig diets. Waste Management 27, 193-200.
5. European Environment Agency 2002. Biodegradable municipal waste management in Europe. Topic report no. 15/2001. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
6. García AJ, Esteban MB, Márquez MC and Ramos P 2005. Biodegradable municipal solid waste: characterisation and potential use as animal feedstuffs. Waste Management 25, 780-787.
7. González J, Díaz CP, Domínguez PL and Torres JL 1984. Evaluación de los desperdicios procesados como sustituto del pienso comercial para cerdos en ceba. Ciencia y Tecnología en la Agricultura. Ganado Porcino 7, (4) 57-74.
8. Kauffman RG, Sybesma W, Smulders FJM, Eikelenboom G, Engel B, Van Laack RLJM, Hovink-bolink AH, Sterrenburg P, Nordheim EV, Walstra P and Van Der Wal PG 1993. The effectiveness of examining early post mortem musculature to predict ultimate pork quality. Meat Science 34, 283-300.
9. Kiely G 1999. Ingeniería Ambiental. McGraw Hill, Madrid, Spain.
10. Madrid A, Madrid R and Madrid JM 1995. Métodos oficiales de análisis de piensos y de alimentos para animales y sus materias primas. In Piensos y alimentos para animales (ed. A Madrid Vicente), pp. 167-193. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, Spain.
11. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación 1988. Especificaciones bacteriológicas para los productos destinados a la alimentación de animales. Boletín Oficial del Estado Español 41. MAPA, Madrid.
12. Maylin A, Martínez O and Rosas B 1991. Apuntes sobre las características de la utilización digestiva de los desperdicios procesados en el cerdo en crecimiento. Zootecnia de Cuba 3-4, 17-24.
13. Pascual AM del R 1992. Microbiología alimentaria: metodología analítica para alimentos y bebidas. Díaz de Santos, Madrid, Spain.
14. Pinacho A, García-Encina P, Sancho P, Ramos P and Márquez MC 2006. Study of drying systems for exploitation of biodegradable municipal wastes. Waste Management 26, 495-503.
15. Sancho P, Pinacho A, Ramos P and Tejedor C 2004. Microbiological characterization of food residues for animal feeding. Waste Management 24, 919-926.
16. Toldra F and Flores M 1999. New developments in guaranteeing the optimal sensory quality of meat. Fundación Vaquero, Madrid, Spain.
17. Westendorf ML 2000. Food waste to animal feed. University Press, Ames, IA, USA.
18. Wiseman J 1987. Feeding of non-ruminant livestock. Butterworths, London, UK.
19. Wulf DM 1999. Did the locker plant steal some of my meat? Current Research Articles. Department of Animal and Range Sciences, South Dakota State University, USA. Available: http://ars.sdstate.edu/MeatSci/May99-1.htm. Accessed: 16 May 2006.