Temporal reliability of willingness to pay from the National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

Applied Economics

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 777-786

  Whitehead, John C ^a   Aiken, Richard ^b  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; FISHING; HUNTING; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CERVIDAE; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 34247580789     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840500438996     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boyle, KJ, Roach, B. and Waddington, DG 1996 net economic values for bass, trout and walleye fishing, deer, elk and moose hunting and wildlife watching. Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
2. Brown Jr, G. and Hay, MJ Net economic recreation values for deer and waterfowl hunting and trout fishing, 1980. Division of Policy and Directives Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Policy and Directives Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
3. Cameron, TA (1991) Interval estimates of nonmarket resource values from referendum contingent valuation. Land Economics, 67, pp. 413-421.
4. Cameron, TA and James, MD (1987) Efficient estimation methods for 'closed-ended' contingent valuation surveys. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, pp. 269-276.
5. Carson, RT, Hanemann, WM, Kopp, RJ, Krosnick, JA, Mitchell, RC, Presser, S., Ruud, PA and Smith, VK (1997) Temporal reliability of estimates from contingent valuation. Land Economics, 73, pp. 151-163.
6. Cooper, J. (1993) Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, pp. 25-40.
7. Cooper, J. and Loomis, J. (1992) Sensitivity of willingness-to-pay estimates to bid design in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models. Land Economics, 68, pp. 211-224.
8. Downing, M. and Ozuna Jr, T. (1996) Testing the reliability of the benefit function transfer approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, pp. 316-323.
9. Duffield, JW and Patterson, DA (1991) Inference and optimal design for welfare measures in dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Economics, 67, pp. 225-239.
10. Hay, MJ Net economic recreation values for deer, elk and waterfowl hunting and bass fishing. Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
11. Hay, MJ Net economic recreation values of nonconsumptive wildlife-related recreation. Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
12. Loomis, JB (1990) Comparative reliability of the dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent valuation techniques. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, pp. 78-85.
13. McConnell, KE (1990) Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, pp. 19-34.
14. Mitchell, RC and Carson, RT (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
15. Portney, PR (1994) The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 3-17.
16. Reiling, SD, Boyle, KJ, Phillips, ML and Anderson, MW (1990) Temporal reliability of contingent values. Land Economics, 66, pp. 128-134.
17. Teisl, MF, Boyle, KJ, McCollum, DW and Reiling, SD (1995) Test-retest reliability of contingent valuation with independent sample pretest and posttest control groups. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, pp. 613-619.
18. Waddington, DG, Boyle, KJ and Cooper, J. 1991 Net economic values for bass and trout fishing, deer hunting and wildlife watching: Addendum to the 1991 national survey of fishing, hunting and wildlife-associated recreation. Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Aid, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC
19. Whitehead, JC and Hoban, TJ (1999) Testing for temporal reliability in contingent valuation with time for changes in factors affecting demand. Land Economics, 73, pp. 453-465.