Early experience with computer-assisted shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus: Development of a novel technique and an in vitro comparison with traditional methods

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2007, Pages

  Bicknell, Ryan T ^a   DeLude, Jen A ^a   Kedgley, Angela E ^a   Ferreira, Louis M ^a   Dunning, Cynthia E ^a   King, Graham J W ^a,b   Faber, Ken J ^a,b   Johnson, James A ^a,b   Drosdowech, Darren S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HUMERUS FRACTURE; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CADAVER; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SHOULDER FRACTURES; SHOULDER JOINT; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 34247574623     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Boileau P., Krishnan S.G., Tinsi L., Walch G., Coste J.S., and Mole D. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 401-412
2. Boileau P., and Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 (1997) 857-865
3. Boileau P., Walch G., and Krishnan S.G. Tuberosity osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty for four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 1 (2000) 96-109
4. DeLude J.A. Computer-assisted shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus (2003), Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada [thesis]
5. DeLude J.A., Bicknell R.T., MacKenzie G.A., Ferreira L.M., Dunning C.E., King G.J.W., et al. An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. Trans Orthop Res Soc (2005)
6. DiGioia A.M., Jaramaz B., and Colgan B.D. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: image guided and robotic assistive technologies. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1998) 8-16
7. Ellis R.E., Tso C.Y., Rudan J.F., and Harrison M.M. A surgical planning and guidance system for high tibial osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 4 (1999) 264-274
8. Frankle M.A., Greenwald D.P., Markee B.A., Ondrovic L.E., and Lee W.E. Biomechanical effects of malposition of tuberosity fragments on the humeral prosthetic reconstruction for four-part humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10 (2001) 321-326
9. Glozman D., Shoham M., and Fischer A. A surface-matching technique for robot-assisted registration. Comput Aided Surg 6 (2001) 259-269
10. Hasan S.S., Leith J.M., Campbell B., Kapil R., Smith K.L., and Matsen F.A. Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 431-441
11. Hasan S.S., Leith J.M., Smith K.L., and Matsen F.A. The distribution of shoulder replacement among surgeons and hospitals is significantly different than that of hip or knee replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12 (2003) 164-169
12. Hawkins R.J., and Switlyk P. Acute prosthetic replacement for severe fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1993) 156-160
13. Leenders T., Vandevelde D., Mahieu G., and Nuyts R. Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput Aided Surg 7 (2002) 99-106
14. Li Q., Zamorano L., Jiang Z., Gong J.X., Pandya A., Perez R., et al. Effect of optical digitizer selection on the application accuracy of a surgical localization system-a quantitative comparison between the OPTOTRAK and flashpoint tracking systems. Comput Aided Surg 4 (1999) 314-321
15. Merloz P., Tonetti J., Eid A., Faure C., Lavallee S., Troccaz J., et al. Computer assisted spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1997) 86-96
16. Milne A.D., Chess D.G., Johnson J.A., and King G.J. Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal range and metal interference. J Biomech 29 (1996) 857-859
17. Milne A.D., and Lee J.M. Error analysis of a direct current electromagnetic tracking system in digitizing 3-dimensional surface geometries. Biomed Sci Instrum 35 (1999) 23-28
18. Robertson D.D., Yuan J., Bigliani L.U., Flatow E.L., and Yamaguchi K. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82 (2000) 1594-1602
19. Schep N.W.L., Broeders I.A.M.J., and van der Werken C. Computer assisted orthopedic and trauma surgery: state of the art and future perspectives. Injury 34 (2003) 299-306
20. Simon D.A., and Lavallee S. Medical imaging and registration in computer assisted surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1998) 17-27
21. Vahala E., Ylihautala M., Tuominen J., Schiffbauer H., Katisko J., Yrjana S., et al. Registration in interventional procedures with optical navigator. J Magn Reson Imaging 13 (2001) 93-98