Valuation using multiple price list formats

Applied Economics

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 675-682

  Anderson, Steffen ^a   Harrison, Glenn W ^b   Lau, Morten I ^c   Rutstrom, E Elisabet ^b  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRICE DETERMINATION; VALUATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 34247562249     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840500462046     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Andersen, S., Harrison, GW, Lau, MI and Rutström, EE (2004) Preference heterogeneity in experiments: Comparing the field and lab. Working Paper 04-21, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida
2. Andersen, S., Harrison, GW, Lau, MI and Rutström, EE (2006) Elicitation using multiple price lists. Experimental Economics, 9, pp. 383-405.
3. Coller, M. and Williams, MB (1999) Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics, 2, pp. 107-127.
4. Davis, DD and Holt, CA (1993) Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
5. Friedman, D. and Sunder, S. (1994) Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists, Cambridge University Press, New York
6. Harrison, GW (1992) Theory and misbehaviour of first-price auctions: reply. American Economic Review, 82, pp. 1426-1443.
7. Harrison, GW (2006) Experimental evidence on alternative environmental valuation methods. Environmental & Resource Economics, 34, pp. 125-162.
8. Harrison, GW, Harstad, RM and Rutström, EE (2004) Experimental methods and elicitation of values. Experimental Economics, 7, pp. 123-140.
9. Harrison, GW, Lau, MI, Rutström, EE and Sullivan, MB (2005) Eliciting risk and time preferences using field experiments: Some methodological issues. Field Experiments in Economics, 10, JAI Press, Research in Experimental Economics, Greenwich, CT
10. Harrison, GW, Lau, MI and Williams, MB (2002) Estimating individual discount rates for Denmark: A field experiment. American Economic Review, 92, pp. 1606-1617.
11. Hoffman, E., Menkhaus, DJ, Chakravarti, D., Field, RA and Whipple, GD (1993) Using laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research: A case study of new packaging for fresh beef. Marketing Science, 12, p. 318.
12. Holt, CA and Laury, SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92, pp. 1644-1655.
13. Kagel, JH and Roth, AE (1995) The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton
14. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, JL and Thaler, RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, pp. 1325-1348.
15. Kirby, KN and Marakovic, NN (1996) Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, pp. 100-104.
16. Kirby, KN, Petry, NM and Bickel, WK (1999) Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, pp. 78-87.
17. Lusk, JL and Hudson, D. (2004) Willingness-to-pay estimates and their relevance to agri business decision making. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26, pp. 152-169.
18. Mitchell, RC and Carson, RT (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore
19. Rutström, EE (1998) Home-grown values and the design of incentive compatible auctions. International Journal of Game Theory, 27, pp. 427-441.
20. Shogren, JF (2004) Experimental methods and valuation. Handbook of Environmental Economics. Volume 2: Valuing Environmental Changes, North-Holland, Amsterdam
21. Stata Corp (2003) Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX