Organizational citizenship behavior and gender: Expectations and attributions for performance

North American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 81-96

  Farrell, Sara K ^a   Finkelstein, Lisa M ^b  

^a Department of Business Administration and Economics   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247559772     PISSN: 15277143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allen, T., & Rush, M. (2001). The influence of ratee gender on ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 2561-2587.
2. Allen, T., & Rush, M. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247-260.
3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4. Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24, 82-98.
5. Dictionary of Occupational Titles (1991). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment, and Training Administration, U.S. Employment Service.
6. Eastman, K. K. (1994). In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1379-1391.
7. Ehrhart, M. G. & Godfrey, E. G. (2003). The role of schemas in gender and organizational citizenship research. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference for the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
8. Graham, J. W. (1986). Organizational citizenship informed by political theory. Paper presented at Academy of Management meetings, Chicago, IL.
9. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
10. Kidder, D. L. (2002). The influence of gender on the performance of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 28, 629-648.
11. Kidder, D. & McLean Parks, J. (2001). The good soldier: Who is (s)he? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 939-959.
12. Locke, E. A. (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field: Ecological validity or abstraction of essential elements? In E. Locke (Ed.) Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 257-267). Lexington Books: Lexington, MA.
13. Lovell, S., Kahn, A., Anton, J., Davidson, A., Dowling, E., Post, D., & Mason, C. (1999). Does gender affect the link between organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluation? Sex Roles, 41, 469-478.
14. Morrison, E. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1543-1567.
15. Organ, D. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85-97.
16. Organ, D. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
17. Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., and MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262-270.
18. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G., (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513-563.
19. Rioux, S. M. & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306-1314.
20. Rudman, L. A. (1998). To be or not to be (self-promoting). In R.M. Kramer & M. A. Neale (eds.), Power and influence in organizations (pp. 287-310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Swim, J. (1993). In search of gender bias in evaluations and trait inferences: The role of diagnosticity and gender stereotypicality of behavioral information. Sex Roles, 29, 213-236.
22. Van Dyne, L. & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108-119.
23. Zellars, K. L. & Kacmar, K. M. (1999). The influence of individual differences on reactions to coworkers' ingratiatory behaviors. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11, 234-248.