Exemplar training and derived transformation of functions in accordance with symmetry and equivalence

Psychological Record

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 273-294

  Gómez, Serafín ^a   Löpez, Francisca ^a   Martin, Carmen Baños ^a   Barnes Holmes, Yvonne ^b   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247531473     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395577     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
2. BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264-267.
3. BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-31.
4. BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders' commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-507.
5. BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001 a). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of functions in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51, 287-308.
6. BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001 b). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry: II. The Psychological Record, 51, 589-603.
7. BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with opposite as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 559-586.
8. BARNES-HOLMES, Y., BARNES-HOLMES, D., SMEETS, P. M., STRAND, P., & FRIMAN, P. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with more-than and less-than as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 531 -558.
9. BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587-605.
10. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions through the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more-than, and less-than. Jounal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184.
11. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1996). A transformation of self- discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271-300.
12. GALIZIO, M. (2003). The abstracted operant: A review of Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition, edited by S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, and B. Roche. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 159-169.
13. GÓMEZ, S., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & LUCIANO, M. C. (2001). Generalized break equivalence I. The Psychological Record, 51, 131-150.
14. GÓMEZ, S., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & LUCIANO, M. C. (2002). Generalized break equivalence II: Contextual control over a generalized pattern of stimulus relations. The Psychological Record, 52, 203-220.
15. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues of verbal behavior (pp.19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
16. HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-29). Reno, NV: Context Press.
17. HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Relational frame theory. A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York. Kluver Academic/Plenum Publishers.
18. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior. Cognition, contingencies and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum.
19. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
20. HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, F. (1996). Toward a theory of verbal behaviour. Journal of the Experimental Analysis Behavior, 68, 271-296.
21. PALMER, D. C. (2004). Data in search of a principle: A review of S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, and B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 189-204.
22. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451-475.
23. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned Stimulus functions in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-301.
24. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
25. SMEETS, P. M., BARNES, D., & LUCIANO, M. C. (1995). Reversal of emergent simple discrimination in children: A component analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 327-343.
26. STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
27. WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). The transfer of conditional sequencing through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.