Cell blocks of breast FNAs frequently allow diagnosis of invasion or histological classification of proliferative changes

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 263-269

  Istvanic, Smiljana ^a   Fischer, Andrew H ^a   Banner, Barbara F ^a   Eaton, Donna M ^a   Larkin, Anne C ^a   Khan, Ashraf ^a  

^a UMASS/Memorial Healthcare   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Cell block; FNA

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYSTOSARCOMA PHYLLOIDES; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CELL PROLIFERATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASMS, DUCTAL, LOBULAR, AND MEDULLARY; PAPILLOMA, INTRADUCTAL; PARAFFIN EMBEDDING; PHYLLODES TUMOR;

EID: 34247470304     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20630     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Vetto J, Pommier R, Schmidt W, et al. Use of the "triple test" for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings. Am J Surg 1995;169:519-522.
2. Ballo MS, Sneige N. Can core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma. A comparative study of 124 women. Cancer 1996;78:773-777.
3. Boerner S, Fornage BD, Singletary E, Sneige N. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of nonpalpable breast lesions: A review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute-supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA. Cancer 1999;87:19-24.
4. Symmans WF, Weg N, Gross J, et al. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities. Cancer 1999;85:1119-1132.
5. Westenend PJ, Sever AR, Beekman-De Volder HJ, Liem SJ. A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the evaluation of breast lesions. Cancer 2001;93:146-150.
6. Liao J, Davey DD, Warren G, Davis J, Moore AR, Samayoa LM. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy remains a valid approach in the evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30:325-331.
7. Chao C, Torosian MH, Boraas MC, et al. Local recurrence of breast cancer in the stereotactic core needle biopsy site: Case reports and review of the literature. Breast J 2001;7:124-127.
8. Abati A, Abele J, Bacus S, et al. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. NIH Consensus Development Conference. Am J Surg 1997;174:371-385.
9. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999;281:1638-1641.
10. Cobb CJ, Raza AS. Obituary: "Alas poor FNA of breast - We knew thee well!". Diagn Cytopathol 2005;32:1-4.
11. Wang HH, Ducatman BS, Eick D. Comparative features of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 1989;92:736-740.
12. Silverman JF, Masood S, Ducatman BS, Wang HH, Sneige N. Can FNA biopsy separate atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast? Cytomorphologic criteria and limitations in diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:713-728.
13. Bondeson L, Lindholm K. Prediction of invasiveness by aspiration cytology applied to nonpalpable breast carcinoma and tested in 300 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:315-320.
14. Shin HJ, Sneige N. Is a diagnosis of infiltrating versus in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast possible in fine-needle aspiration specimens? Cancer 1998;84:186-191.
15. Bonzanini M, Gilioli E, Brancato B, et al. The cytopathology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. A detailed analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of 58 cases compared with 101 invasive ductal carcinomas. Cytopathology 2001;12:107-119.
16. McKee GT, Tambouret RH, Finkelstein D. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: Invasive vs. in situ carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;25:73-77.
17. al-Kaisi N. The spectrum of the "gray zone" in breast cytology. A review of 186 cases of atypical and suspicious cytology. Acta Cytol 1994;38:898-908.
18. Wang HH, Ducatman BS. Fine needle aspiration of the breast. A probabilistic approach to diagnosis of carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1998;42:285-289.
19. Ayata G, Wang HH. Fine needle aspiration cytology of lobular carcinoma in situ on ThinPrep. Diagn Cytopathol 2005;32:276-280.
20. Simsir A, Waisman J, Thorner K, Cangiarella J. Mammary lesions diagnosed as "papillary" by aspiration biopsy: 70 cases with follow-up. Cancer 2003;99:156-165.
21. Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies: To excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1095-1110.
22. Arisio R, Cuccorese C, Accinelli G, Mano MP, Bordon R, Fessia L. Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: Analysis of a series of 4,110 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:462-467.
23. Mosunjac MB, Lewis MM, Lawson D, Cohen C. Use of a novel marker, calponin, for myoepithelial cells in fine-needle aspirates of papillary breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23:151-155.
24. Kim A, Lee J, Choi JS, Won NH, Koo BH. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Experience at an outpatient breast clinic. Acta Cytol 2000;44:361-367.
25. Fischer AH, Vartanian H, Hanc BJ, et al. Efficient technique for making paraffin-embedded "rapid cell blocks" in 12 minutes. Mod Pathol 2006;19 (suppl 1):57.
26. Soule N, Mui K, O'Brien M, Fischer A. A rapid, automated system for creating paraffin embedded cell blocks. Cancer Cytopathol 2006;108 (suppl 5):444-445.
27. Fischer AH. How breast cancer is diagnosed. Available at http://mammary.nih.gov/reviews/tumorigenesis/Fischer001/index.html [1997].
28. Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 1985;312:146-151.
29. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: Improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 1996;62:738-744.
30. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: Determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001;218:497-502.
31. Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Zalles CM, et al. Short-term breast cancer prediction by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1217-1227.
32. Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, Miike R, et al. Breast cancer risk in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1791-1798.
33. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, et al. Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:229-237.
34. Brogi E, Robson M, Panageas KS, Casadio C, Ljung BM, Montgomery L. Ductal lavage in patients undergoing mastectomy for mammary carcinoma: A correlative study. Cancer 2003;98:2170-2176.
35. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: Accuracy at predicting invasion. Radiology 1995;194:379-381.
36. Rosai J. Borderline epithelial lesions of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15:209-221.
37. Ellis IO, Coleman D, Wells C, et al. Impact of a national external quality assessment scheme for breast pathology in the UK. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:138-145.
38. Gornstein B, Jacobs T, Bedard Y, et al. Interobserver agreement of a probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine-needle aspirations on ThinPrep. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30:389-395.
39. Jeffrey PB, Ljung BM. Benign and malignant papillary lesions of the breast. A cytomorphologic study. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:500-507.
40. Nayar R, De Frias DV, Bourtsos EP, Sutton V, Bedrossian C. Cytologic differential diagnosis of papillary pattern in breast aspirates: Correlation with histology. Ann Diagn Pathol 2001;5:34-42.
41. Choi YD, Gong GY, Kim MJ, et al. Clinical and cytologic features of papillary neoplasms of the breast. Acta Cytol 2006;50:35-40.
42. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: False-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805.