EXTRATERRITORIAL CRIMINAL JURISDICTION: REPLACING "OBJECTIVE TERRITORIALITY" WITH "DEFENSIVE TERRITORIALITY"

Studies in Law Politics and Society

Volumn 28, Issue , 2003, Pages 117-135

  Podgor, Ellen S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247442481     PISSN: 10594337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1059-4337(02)28005-9     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. G.B. Born Reappraisal of the extraterritorial reach of U.S. law Law & Policy in International Business 24 1992 1
2. Cameron, I. (1994). The protective principle of international criminal jurisdiction . Aldershot England: Dartmouth Publishing Co.
3. Congress may validly enact legislation embodying protective theory of criminal jurisdiction. (1961). University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 110, 5.
4. J.C. Coffee Jr. Paradigms lost: The blurring of the criminal and civil law models – and what can be done about it Yale Law Journal 101 1992 1875
5. Coffin, J. T. (2000). The extraterritorial application of the economic espionage act of 1996. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review , 527.
6. Council of Europe Committee on Crime Problems. (1992). Extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction. Criminal Law Forum, 3 , 441.
7. Chua Han Mow v. United States, 730 F.2d 1308 (9th Cir. 1984).
8. 18 U.S. C. § 1512 (2000).
9. 18 U.S. C. § 1956 (1994).
10. 18 U.S. C. § 1621 (1994).
11. 18 U.S. C. § 1623(b) (2000).
12. 18 U.S. C. § 1030 (2000).
13. 18 U.S. C. § 2332(b) (1994).
14. Eighty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law. (1991). Extraterritorial application of criminal law. American Society of International Law & Procedure, 85 , 283.
15. W. Estey The five bases of extraterritorial jurisdiction and the failure of the presumption against extraterritoriality Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 21 1997 177
16. Export Administration Act, 50 U.S. C. §§ 2401–2420 (1994).
17. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 15 U.S. C. §§ 78dd-1, 78dd-2, 78ff. (1994).
18. K. Fettig Criminal and civil remedies for transboundary water pollution Transnational Law 15 2002 117
19. France v. Turkey, P. C. I. J., Ser. A, No. 10 (1927).
20. Germany and U.S. clash over efforts to crack down on neo-nazi web sites in the U.S. (2001, February). International Enforcement Law Report No. 2, 17 , VI.A64.
21. J.P. Griffin Foreign governmental reactions to U.S. assertions of extraterritorial jurisdiction George Mason Law Review 6 1998 505
22. L.C. Griffin The prudent prosecutor Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 14 2001 259
23. J.M. Grippando Declining to exercise extraterritorial antitrust jurisdiction on grounds of international comity: An illegitimate extension of the judicial abstention doctrine Virginia Journal of International Law 23 1983 395
24. Harvard Research in International Law. (1935). Jurisdiction with respect to crime. American Journal of International Law, 29 (Supplement), 437.
25. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945).
26. Johnston, D. (1995, April 17). Strength is seen in a U.S. export: Law enforcement. The New York Times , pp. A1, A8.
27. K. Mann Punitive civil sanctions: The middleground between criminal and civil law Yale Law Journal 101 1992 1795
28. Nippon v. United States, 109 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1997).
29. W.S. Laufer I. Taka Japan regulatory compliance, and the wisdom of extraterritorial social controls Hastings International & Comparative Law Review 18 1995 487
30. Lippman, T. W., & Smith, J. R. (1996, August 20). FBI plan to expand overseas, The Washington Post , p. A1.
31. Pakistan resists U.S. extradition. (2002, May 6). The Wall Street Journal , p. A18.
32. B. Pearce The comity doctrine as a barrier to judicial jurisdiction: A U.S. – E.U. comparison Stanford Journal of International Law 30 1994 525
33. E.S. Podgor Globalization and the federal prosecution of white collar crime American Criminal Law Review 34 1997 325
34. E.S. Podgor The ethics and professionalism of prosecutors in discretionary decisions Fordham Law Review 68 2000 1511
35. Podgor, E. S., & Wise, E. M. (2000). International criminal law: Cases and materials . New York: Matthew Bender & Co.
36. E.S. Podgor Computer crimes and the USA patriot act Criminal Journal Magazine 17 2002 61
37. E.S. Podgor International computer fraud: A paradigm for limiting national jurisdiction University of California at Davis Law Review 35 2002 267
38. Podgor, E. S. (in press). “Defensive territoriality”: A new paradigm for the prosecution of extraterritorial business crimes. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law .
39. T. Raimo Winning at the expense of law: The ramifications of expanding counter-terrorism law enforcement jurisdiction overseas American University International Review 14 1999 1473
40. K.C. Randall Universal jurisdiction under international law Texas Law Review 66 1988 785
41. Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (3rd ed.) (1989). St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute.
42. Smith, B. T. (1991). Assertion of adjudicatory jurisdiction by United States courts over international terrorism cases. Army Law (October), 13.
43. Strassheim v. Daily, 221 U.S. 280 (1911).
44. Twining, W. (2002). Globalisation and legal theory . Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
45. United States Department of Justice. (1997). United States Attorney’s Manual §§ 9–1.100, 9–15.630, 9–47.00.
46. United States Department of Justice. (2000). United States Attorney’s Manual § 9–2.400.
47. United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992).
48. United States v. Best, 2002 WL 31080306 (3rd Cir. 2002).
49. United States v. Boots, 80 F. 3d 580 (1st Cir. 1996).
50. United States v. Bowman, 260 U.S. 94 (1922).
51. United States v. Caceres, 440 U.S. 741 (1973).
52. United States v. Caicedo, 47 F.3d 370 (9th Cir. 1995).
53. United States v. Castillo Felix, 539 F.2d 9 (9th Cir. 1976).
54. United States v. Evans, 667 F. Supp. 974 (S. D. N. Y. 1987).
55. United States v. Gonzales, 776 F. 2d 931 (11th Cir. 1985).
56. United States v. James-Robinson, 515 F. Supp. 1340 (S. D.FL 1981).
57. United States v. MacAllister, 160 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 1998).
58. United States v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd., 109 F.3d 1 (1st 1997).
59. United States v. Pizdrint, 983 F. Supp. 1110 (M. D. Fla. 1997).
60. United States v. Plummer, 221 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2000).
61. United States v. Postal, 589 f.2d 862 (5th Cir. 1979).
62. United States v. Sheikh, Indictment, U.S. D.C. D. N. J., March 12, 2002.
63. United States v. Trapilo, 130 F.3d 547 (2d Cir. 1997).
64. United States v. Wright-Baker, 784 F.2d 161 (3rd Cir. 1989).
65. th Cong. § 814 (2001).
66. S.W. Waller The twilight of comity Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 38 2000 563
67. G.R. Watson Offenders abroad: The case for nationality-based criminal jurisdiction The Yale Journal of International Law 17 1992 41
68. G.R. Watson The passive personality principal Texas International Law Journal 28 1993 1
69. Yahoo, Inc. v. LaLigue Contre Le Racisme Et L’Antisemitisme, C-00-21275 JF, (D. Cal. 2001).