Globalization and the federal prosecution of white collar crime

American Criminal Law Review

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 325-

  Podgor, Ellen S ^a  

^a Indiana University School of Law Indianapolis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347875859     PISSN: 01640364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. See, e.g., Symposium: Federalism and the Criminal Justice System, 98 W. VA. L. REV. 757 (1996); The Federal Role In Criminal Law, 543 ANNALS AM. ACAD. POL. & SOC. SCI. 9 (ed. J. Strazzella Jan. 1996); Symposium-Federalization of Crime: The Roles of the Federal and State Governments in the Criminal Justice System, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 965 (1995); Peter J. Henning, Forward: Statutory Interpretation and the Federalization of Criminal Law, 86 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1167 (1996).
2. See, e.g., Symposium: Federalism and the Criminal Justice System, 98 W. VA. L. REV. 757 (1996); The Federal Role In Criminal Law, 543 ANNALS AM. ACAD. POL. & SOC. SCI. 9 (ed. J. Strazzella Jan. 1996); Symposium-Federalization of Crime: The Roles of the Federal and State Governments in the Criminal Justice System, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 965 (1995); Peter J. Henning, Forward: Statutory Interpretation and the Federalization of Criminal Law, 86 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1167 (1996).
3. See, e.g., Symposium: Federalism and the Criminal Justice System, 98 W. VA. L. REV. 757 (1996); The Federal Role In Criminal Law, 543 ANNALS AM. ACAD. POL. & SOC. SCI. 9 (ed. J. Strazzella Jan. 1996); Symposium-Federalization of Crime: The Roles of the Federal and State Governments in the Criminal Justice System, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 965 (1995); Peter J. Henning, Forward: Statutory Interpretation and the Federalization of Criminal Law, 86 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1167 (1996).
4. See, e.g., Symposium: Federalism and the Criminal Justice System, 98 W. VA. L. REV. 757 (1996); The Federal Role In Criminal Law, 543 ANNALS AM. ACAD. POL. & SOC. SCI. 9 (ed. J. Strazzella Jan. 1996); Symposium-Federalization of Crime: The Roles of the Federal and State Governments in the Criminal Justice System, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 965 (1995); Peter J. Henning, Forward: Statutory Interpretation and the Federalization of Criminal Law, 86 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 1167 (1996).
5. Sara Sun Beale, Federalizing Crime: Assessing the Impact on the Federal Courts, 543 ANNALS AM. ACAD. POL. & SOC. SCI. 39, 42-44 (1996) ("[b]y the mid-1990s, there were more than 3000 federal crimes").
6. Id. at 45 (noting that the number of federal prosecutors in United States Attorney's Offices increased from approximately 3000 in the mid-1970's to over 8000 by the middle of the 1990's).
7. Id. at 45-46; cf. Rory K. Little, Myths and Principles of Federalization, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 1029 (1995) (discussing arguments for and against federalization of crimes, and advocating federalization in instances of "demonstrated state failure").
8. Id. at 45-46; cf. Rory K. Little, Myths and Principles of Federalization, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 1029 (1995) (discussing arguments for and against federalization of crimes, and advocating federalization in instances of "demonstrated state failure").
9. See, e.g., Kathleen F. Brickey, Criminal Mischief: The Federalization of American Criminal Law, 46 HASTINGS L.J. 1135(1995).
10. 115 S.Ct. 1624 (1995).
11. The Court held that the Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress' Commerce Clause authority.
12. See, e.g., Kathleen F. Brickey, Crime Control and the Commerce Clause: Life After Lopez, 46 CASE W. RES. L. REV. 801 (1996) (discussion of cases after Lopez).