Multiperspective digital libraries: The implications of constructionism for the development of digital libraries

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 561-569

  Tuominen, Kimmo ^a   Talja, Sanna ^b   Savolainen, Reijo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA TRANSFER; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING;

ELECTRONIC INFORMATION;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 0037392685     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10243     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agre, P. (1995). Institutional circuitry: Thinking about the forms and uses of information. Information Technology and Libraries, 14, 225-230.
2. Berners-Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
3. Bishop, A.P., Mehra, B., Bazzell, I., & Smith, C. (2000). Socially grounded user studies in digital library development. First Monday, 5. Available: http//firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_6/bishop/index.html
4. Bishop, A.P., Bazzell, I., Mehra, B., & Smith, C. (2001). Afya: Social and digital technologies that reach across the digital divide. First Monday, 6. Available: http//firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_4/bishop/index.html
5. Blair, D.C. (1990). Language and representation in information retrieval. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Borgman, C.L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing & Management, 35, 227-243.
7. Bowker, G.C. (2000). Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30, 643-83.
8. Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Brenneise, H.B, & Marks, E.B (2001). Creating a state-wide virtual health library: The Michigan experience. Online Information Review, 25, 115-120.
10. Buckingham Shum, S., Motta, E., & Domingue, J. (1999). Representing scholarly claims in Internet digital libraries: A knowledge modelling approach. In S. Abiteboul & A.-M. Vercoustre (Eds.), Research and advanced technology for digital libraries (pp. 423-442). Berlin: Springer.
11. Buckingham Shum, S.B., & Selvin, A.M. (2000). Structuring discourse for collective interpretation. Paper presented at Distributed Collective Practices 2000: Conference on collective cognition and memory practices, Paris, September 19-20. Available: http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/scholonto/scholonto-archive.html)
12. Buckland, M. (1999). Vocabulary as a central concept in library and information science. In T. Aparac, T. Saracevic, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.), Digital libraries: Interdisciplinary concepts, challenges and opportunities (COLIS 3) (pp. 3-12). Zagreb: Zavod za informacijske studije Ofsjeka za informacijske znanosti, Filozofski fakultet.
13. Day, R.E. (2000). The "conduit metaphor" and the nature and politics of information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 805-811.
14. Dervin, B (1989). Audience as listener and learner, teacher and confidante: The sense-making approach. In R. Rice & C. Atkins (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (pp. 67-90). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Dervin, B. (1991). Information as non-sense, information as sense: The communication technology connection. In H. Bouwman, P, Nelissen, & M. Voojis (Eds.), Tussen vraag en aanbod: Optimalisering van de informationvoorziening (pp. 44-59). Amsterdam: Otto Cramwinkel Uitgever.
16. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind's eye of the "user": The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In J.D. Glazier & R.R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative research in information management (pp. 61-84). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
17. Dervin, B. (1994). Information ↔ democracy: An examination of underlying assumptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 369-385.
18. Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2, 36-46.
19. Dervin, B. (1999). On studying information seeking methodologically: The implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing & Management, 35, 727-750.
20. Frohmann, B. (1992). The power of images: A discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 48, 365-386.
21. Frohmann, B. (2001). Discourse and documentation: Some implications for pedagogy and research. Journal of Library and Information Science Education, 42, 13-28.
22. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
23. Gergen, K.J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
24. Hacking, I. (1998). On being more literal about construction. In I. Velody & R. Williams (Eds.), The politics of constructionism (pp. 49-68). London: Sage.
25. Hall, S. (1989). Ideology and communication theory. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. O'Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 1: Paradigm issues (pp. 40-52). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Hjørland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: An activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
27. Hjørland, B. (1998). Theory and metatheory in information science: A new interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 54, 606-621.
28. Hjørland, B. (2000). Library and information science: Practice, theory and philosophical basis. Information Processing and Management, 36, 501-531.
29. Ingwersen, P. (1994). Polyrepresentation of information needs and semantic entities: Elements of a cognitive theory for information retrieval interaction. In W.B. Croft & C.J. van Rijsbergen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Dublin, Ireland, July 3-6, 1994 (pp. 101-110). London: Springer.
30. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52, 3-50.
31. Jacob, E.K., & Albrechtsen, H. (1999). When essence becomes function: Post-structuralist implications for an ecological theory of organisational classification systems. In T.D. Wilson & D.K. Allen (Eds.), Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the second international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts, August 13-15. 1998, Sheffield, UK (pp. 519-534). London: Taylor Graham.
32. Jacob, E.K., & Shaw, D. (1998). Sociocognitive perspectives on representation. In M.E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology 33 (pp. 131-185). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
33. Mancini, C. (2000). Internet mediated scholarly discourse: Languages of the electronic paradigm. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University. Knowledge Media Institute. Available: http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/clara/work.html
34. Marchionini, G. (1999). Augmenting library services: Toward the sharium. Paper presented at the Internal Symposium on Digital Libraries, ISDL 99, September 28-29, University of Library and Information Science, Tsukuba, Japan. Available: http://ils.unc.edu/̃march/
35. Mokros, H.B. (1993). The impact of a native theory of information on two privileged accounts of personhood. In J.R. Schement & B.D. Ruben (Eds.), Between communication and information (pp. 57-79). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
36. Olson, H.A. (1998). Mapping beyond Dewey's boundaries: Constructing classificatory spaces for marginalized knowledge domains. Library Trends, 47, 233-254.
37. Radford. G.P., & Radford, M.L. (2001). Libraries, librarians and the discourse of fear. The Library Quarterly, 71, 299-329.
38. Rafaeli. S. (1988). Interactivity: From new mass media to communication. In R.P. Hawkings, J.M. Wiemann. & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Reddy, M.J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Rowlands, I., & Bawden, D. (1999). Digital libraries: A conceptual framework. Libri, 49, 192-202.
42. Ruukki, J. (2001). Terveysviestit solmussa [Knotty health messages]. Tiede, 21, 26-28.
43. Sonnenwald, D.H., Marchionini, G., Wildemuth, B.M, Dempsey, B.J., Viles, C.L., Tibbo, H.R., & Smith, J.B. (1999). Collaboration services in a participatory digital library: An emerging design. In T. Aparac, T. Saracevic, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.), Digital libraries: Interdisciplinary concepts, challenges and opportunities (COLIS 3) (pp. 141-152). Zagreb: Zavod za informacijske studije Ofsjeka za informacijske znanosti, Filozofski fakultet.
44. Talja, S. (1997). Constituting "information" and "user" as research objects: A theory of knowledge formations as an alternative to the information man-theory. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context (ISIC): Proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts, August 14-16, 1996, Tampere, Finland (pp. 67-80). London: Taylor Graham.
45. Talja, S. (1999). Analyzing qualitative interview data: The discourse analytic method. Library and Information Science Research, 21, 459-477.
46. Talja, S. (2001). Music, culture, and the library: An analysis of discourses. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
47. Talja, S., Heinisuo, R., Pispa, K., Luukkainen, S., & Järvelin, K. (1997). Discourse analysis in the development of a regional information service. In M. Beaulieu. E. Davenport, & N.O. Pors (Eds.), Library and information studies: Research and professional practice (pp. 109-128). London: Taylor Graham.
48. Tuominen, K. (1997). User-centered discourse: An analysis of the subject positions of the user and the librarian. Library Quarterly, 67, 350-371.
49. Tuominen, K. (2000). Monologue or dialogue in the Web environment: The role of networked library and information services in the future. Paper presented at the 66th IFLA Council and General Conference, Jerusalem, Israel, August 13-18, 2000. Available: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/004-131e.htm
50. Tuominen, K. (2001). Tiedon muodostus ja virtuaalikirjaston rakentaminen: Konstruktionistinen analyysi [Knowledge formation and digital library design: A constructionist analysis]. Espoo: CSC-Scientific Computing Ltd. Available: http://acta.uta.fi/teos.phtml?5179
51. Tuominen, K., & Savolainen, R. (1997). Social constructionist approach to the study of information use as discursive action. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin (Eds.), Information seeking in context (ISIC): Proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts, August 14-16, 1996, Tampere, Finland (pp. 81-96). London: Taylor Graham.
52. Tuominen, K., Talja, S., & Savolainen, R. (2002). Discourse, cognition and reality: Toward a social constructionist metatheory for library and information science. In H. Bruce, R. Fidel, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.), Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on conceptions of library and information science (CoLIS 4) (pp. 271-284). Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
53. Wilson, P. (1978). Some fundamental concepts of information retrieval. Drexel Library Quarterly, 14, 10-24.
54. Volosinov, V. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.