Reliability and validity of the static-2002 among adult sexual offenders with reference to treatment status

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 616-640

  Langton, Calvin M ^a,b,e   Barbaree, Howard E ^a   Hansen, Kevin T ^a   Harkins, Leigh ^c   Peacock, Edward J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d Correctional Service of Canada ^*  (Canada)

^e RAMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actuarial risk assessment; Dropouts; Recidivism prediction; Refusers; Reliability; RRASOR; Sexual offenders; Static 2002; Static 99; Treatment completion; Treatment dropout; Treatment refusal; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247381054     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854806296851     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing (3 rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3 rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3. Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (2005). ATSA Practice standards and guidelines for the evaluation, treatment and management of adult male sexual abusers. Beaverton, OR: Author.
4. Barbaree, H.E., Blanchard, R., Langton, C.M. (2003). The development of sexual aggression through the life span: The effect of age on sexual arousal and recidivism among sex offenders. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989 pp. 59-71). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
5. Barbaree, H.E., Langton, C.M., Peacock, E.J. (2006). The factor structure of actuarial items: Its relation to prediction. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 207-226.
6. Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Langton, C.M., Peacock, E.J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490-521.
7. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
8. Becker, J.V., Murphy, W.D. (1998). What we know and do not know about assessing and treating sex offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 116-137.
9. Boer, A. (2003). Evaluating the Static-99 and Static-2002 risk scales using Canadian sexual offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester, Leicester, England.
10. Boer, D.P., Hart, S.D., Kropp, P.R., Webster, C.D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University. The Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
11. Bonta, J., Law, M., Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123-142.
12. Butz-Whittaker, J.W., Strassberg, D.S., The Center for Family Development. (2001, November). The Sex Offender Treatment Outcome PredictorStatic/Dynamic (SOTOP-S/D). Poster presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, TX.
13. Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R.J., Kamarck, T., Hoberman, H.M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. G. Sarason B. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and application (pp. 73-94). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
14. Cortoni, F., Marshall, W.L. (2001). Sex as a coping strategy and its relationship to juvenile sexual history and intimacy in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 27-43.
15. Doren, D.M. (2002). Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitments and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Doren, D.M. (2004 a). SVP evaluators' risk assessment usage: August 2004. Unpublished manuscript.
17. Doren, D.M. (2004 b). Toward a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 835-856.
18. Epperson, D.L., Kaul, J.D., Huot, S., Goldman, R., Alexander, W. (2003). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening ToolRevised (MnSOST-R) technical paper: Development, validation, and recommended risk level cut scores. Retrieved May 26, 2006, from http://www.psychology.iastate.edu/~dle/TechUpdatePaper12-03.pdf
19. Epperson, D.L., Kaul, J.D., Huot, S.J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., Goldman, R. (1998). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening ToolRevised (MnSOST-R) St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
20. Fleiss, J.L. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley.
21. Hagg, A.M. (2005). Do psychological interventions impact on actuarial measures: An analysis of the predictive validity of the Static-99 and the Static-2002 on a re-conviction measure of sexual recidivism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
22. Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B.J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36.
23. Hanson, R.K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report 1997-04). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
24. Hanson, R.K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Follow-up data from 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046-1062.
25. Hanson, R.K. (2005). Twenty years of progress of violence risk assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 212-217.
26. Hanson, R.K., Bussire, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
27. Hanson, R.K., Harris, A.J.R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 105-122.
28. Hanson, R.K., Morton, K.E., Harris, A.J.R. (2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989, pp. 154-166). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
29. Hanson, R.K., Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Public Works and Government Services Canada. Cat. No. PS3-1/2004-2E-PDF.
30. Hanson, R.K., Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 1999-02). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
31. Hanson, R.K., Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
32. Hanson, R.K., Thornton, D. (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002 (User Report 2003-01). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
33. Hare, R.D. (1991). Manual for the revised Psychopathy Checklist. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
34. Hare, R.D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy ChecklistRevised (PCL-R): Technical manual. (2nd ed.) Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
35. Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
36. Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumire, M.L., Boer, D., Lang, C. (2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
37. Kaiser, H.F. (1981). A revised measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic data matrices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 379-381.
38. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
39. Langton, C.M. (2003). Contrasting approaches to risk assessment with adult male sexual offenders: An evaluation of recidivism prediction schemes and the utility of supplementary clinical information for enhancing predictive accuracy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
40. Langton, C.M., Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Peacock, E.J., Harkins, L., Hansen, K.T. (2007). Actuarial assessment of risk for reoffense among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the Static-2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 37-59.
41. Langton, C.M., Harkins, L., Peacock, E.J., Barbaree, H.E. (2003, August). Core dimensions underlying risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders. Paper presented at the 111th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
42. McGrath, R.J., Cumming, G.F., Bouchard, B.L. (2003). Current practices and trends in sexual abuser management: The Safer Society 2002 Nationwide Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
43. Miller, R.S., Lefcourt, H.M. (1982). The assessment of social intimacy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 514-518.
44. Monahan, J., Steadman, H.J., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P.S., Robbins, P.C., Mulvey, E.P., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Mossman, D. (2006). Another look at interpreting risk categories. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 41-63.
46. Mossman, D., Berger, J.O. (2001). Intervals for posttest probabilities: A comparison of 5 methods. Medical Decision Making, 21, 498-507.
47. Otto, R.K., Heilbrun, K. (2002). The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past. American Psychologist, 57, 5-18.
48. Quinsey, V.L., Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Cormier, C.A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49. Rice, M.E., Harris, G.T. (1997). Cross-validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231-241.
50. Roberts, C.F., Doren, D.M., Thornton, D. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569-589.
51. Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., Cutrona, C.E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
52. Sjstedt, G., Lngstrm, N. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 629-645.
53. Stadtland, C., Hollweg, M., Kleindienst, N., Dietl, J., Reich, U., Nedopil, N. (2005). Risk assessment and prediction of violent and sexual recidivism in sex offenders: Long-term predictive validity of four risk assessment instruments. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 16, 92-108.
54. Swets, J.A., Dawes, R.M., Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 1, 1-26.
55. Zamble, E., Quinsey, V.L. (1997). The criminal recidivism process. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.