ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Palpable Breast Masses

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 285-288

  Parikh, Jay R ^a  

^a SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

biopsy; Breast mass; decision making; diagnostic imaging; palpable mass

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PALPATION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; RADIOLOGY; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING;

EID: 34247371029     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.01.017     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2006 (2006), American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Ga
2. Donegan W.L. Evaluation of a palpable breast mass. N Engl J Med 327 (1992) 937-942
3. Rosner D., and Blaird D. What ultrasonography can tell in breast masses that mammography and physical examination cannot. J Surg Oncol 28 (1985) 308-313
4. Boyd N.F., Sutherland H.J., Fish E.B., Hiraki G.Y., Lickley H.L., and Maurer V.E. Prospective evaluation of physical examination of the breast. Am J Surg 142 (1981) 331-334
5. Baker L.H. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin 32 (1982) 194-225
6. Eklund G.W., and Cardenosa G. The art of mammographic positioning. Radiol Clin North Am 30 (1992) 21-53
7. Dershaw D.D., Eddins G., Liberman L., et al. Sonographic and clinical findings in women with palpable breast disease and negative mammography. Breast Dis 8 (1995) 13-17
8. Georgian-Smith D., Taylor K.J., Madjar H., et al. Sonography of palpable breast cancer. J Clin Ultrasound 28 (2000) 211-216
9. Liberman L., Ernberg L.A., Heerdt A., et al. Palpable breast masses: is there a role for percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy?. AJR 175 (2000) 779-787
10. Stavros A.T., Thickman D., Rapp C.L., Dennis M.A., Parker S.H., and Sisney G.A. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196 (1995) 123-134
11. Soo M.S., Rosen E.L., Baker J.A., Vo T.T., and Boyd B.A. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR 177 (2001) 1167-1170
12. Shetty M.K., and Shah Y.P. Prospective evaluation of the value of negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 21 (2002) 1211-1216
13. Moy L., Slanetz P.J., Moore R., et al. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review. Radiology 225 (2002) 176-181
14. Orel S.G., and Schnall M.D. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220 (2001) 13-30
15. Berg W.A., Gutierrez L., NessAiver M.S., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233 (2004) 830-849
16. Yeh E., Slanetz P., Kopans D.B., et al. Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer. AJR 184 (2005) 868-877
17. Yutani K., Shiba E., Kusuoka H., et al. Comparison of FDG-PET with MIBI-SPECT in the detection of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24 (2000) 274-280
18. Mathieu I., Mazy S., Willemart B., Destine M., Mazy G., and Lonneux M. Inconclusive triple diagnosis in breast cancer imaging: is there a place for scintimammography?. J Nucl Med 46 (2005) 1574-1581
19. Feig S.A., and Ehrlich S.M. Estimation of radiation risk from screening mammography: recent trends and comparison with expected benefits. Radiology 174 (1990) 638-647
20. Bennett I.C., Freitas Jr. R., and Fentiman I.S. Diagnosis of breast cancer in young women. Aust N Z J Surg 61 (1991) 284-289
21. Ciatto S., Bravetti P., Bonardi R., and Rosselli del Turco M. The role of mammography in women under 30. Radiol Med (Torino) 80 (1990) 676-678
22. Feig S.A. Breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 30 (1992) 67-92
23. Harris V.J., and Jackson V.P. Indications for breast imaging in women under age 35 years. Radiology 172 (1989) 445-448
24. Williams S.M., Kaplan P.A., Petersen J.C., and Lieberman R.P. Mammography in women under age 30: is there clinical benefit?. Radiology 161 (1986) 49-51
25. Bassett L.W., Ysrael M., Gold R.H., and Ysrael C. Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age. Radiology 180 (1991) 831-835
26. Kronemer K.A., Rhee K., Siegel M.J., Sievert L., and Hildebolt C.F. Gray scale sonography of breast masses in adolescent girls. J Ultrasound Med 20 (2001) 491-496
27. Palmer M.L., and Tsangaris T.N. Breast biopsy in women 30 years old or less. Am J Surg 165 (1993) 708-712
28. Jeffries D.O., and Adler D.D. Mammographic detection of breast cancer in women under the age of 35. Invest Radiol 25 (1990) 67-71
29. Meyer J.E., Kopans D.B., and Oot R. Breast cancer visualized by mammography in patients under 35. Radiology 147 (1983) 93-94
30. Shaw de Paredes E., Marsteller L.P., and Eden B.V. Breast cancers in women 35 years of age and younger: mammographic findings. Radiology 177 (1990) 117-119