Prospective evaluation of the value of negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1211-1216

  Shetty, Mahesh Kalappa ^a   Shah, Yogesh P ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast biopsy; Breast imaging; Breast sonography; Palpable breast lumps

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; PATIENT MONITORING; TUMORS;

PALPABLE ABNORMALITIES;

ULTRASONICS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; DISEASE COURSE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PALPATION;

EID: 0036828923     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.11.1211     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baker LH. Breast Cancer Detection Demonstratic Project: Five year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin 1982; 32:194-225.
2. Perdue P, Page D, Nellestein M, Salem C, Galbo C, Ghosh B. Early detection of breast carcinoma: Comparison of palpable and nonpalpable lesion Surgery 1992; 111:656-659.
3. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria 2000: Work-up of palpable brea masses. Radiology 2000; 215(suppl):961-964.
4. Huynh PT, Jarolimek AM, Daye S. The false-negative mammogram. Radiographics 1998; 18:1137-1154.
5. Donegan WL. Evaluation of a palpable breast mas N Engl J Med 1992; 327:937-942.
6. Dennis MA, Parker SH, Klaus AJ, Stavros AT, Kask TI, Clark SB. Breast biopsy avoidance: The value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. Radiology 2001; 219: 186-191.
7. Weinstein SP, Conant EF, Orel SG, Zuckerman JA, Czeriecki B, Lawton TJ. Retrospective review of palpable breast lesions: Negative mammography and sonography. J Womens Imaging 2000; 2:15-18.
8. Soo MS, Rosen EL, Baker JA, Vo TT, Boyd BA. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1167-1170.
9. Kopans DB, Moore RH, Slanetz PJ, et al. The specificity of a combined mammography and ultrasonographic evaluation of palpable lumps and palpable thickening [abstract]. Radiology 1999; 213(suppl): 371.
10. American College of Radiology. Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADSTM). 3rd Ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1998:168-175.
11. Cornelia JB, Miller AB, Bassett AA. Physical examination: Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer 1989; 63:1816-1822.
12. Coveney EC, Geraghty JG, O'Laoide R, Hourihane JB, O'Higgins NJ. Reasons underlying negative mammography in patients with palpable breast cancer. Clin Radiol 1994; 49:123-125.
13. Hall FM. Sonography of the breast: Controversies and opinions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 1635-1636.
14. Morrow M, Wong S, Venta L. The evaluation of breast masses in women younger than forty years of age. Surgery 1998; 124:634-640.
15. Georgian-Smith D, Taylor KJW, Madjar H, et al. Sonography of palpable breast cancer. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28:211-216.
16. Moss HA, Britton PD, Flower CDR, Freeman AH, Lomas DJ, Warren RML. How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population? Clin Radiol 1999; 54:676-682.