Toward a better understanding of the role of geography in intensity of end-of-life care: Must we first come to an understanding of end-of-life care?

Medical Care

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 374-376

  Virnig, Beth A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EDITORIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GEOGRAPHY; HOSPICE CARE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICARE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; TERMINAL CARE; UNITED STATES;

GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HOSPICE CARE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICARE; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; TERMINAL CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247355031     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000263474.23170.c2     Document Type: Editorial

References (18)

1. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973;182:1102-1108.
2. Fisher ES, Wennberg JE, Stukel TA, et al. Hospital readmission rates for cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:989-995.
3. Scitovsky AA. "The high cost of dying": what do the data show? 1984. Milbank Q. 2005;83:825-841.
4. Barnato AE, Herndon MB, Anthony DL, et al. Are regional variations in end-of-life care intensity explained by patient preferences? A study of the US medicare population. Med Care. 2007;45:386-393.
5. Virnig BA, Moscovice IS, Durham SB, et al. Do rural elders have limited access to Medicare hospice services? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:731-735.
6. US General Accounting Office. Medicare: More Beneficiaries Use Hospice but for Fewer Days of Care. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office; 2000. Publication GAO/HEHS-00-182.
7. Virnig BA, Kind S, McBean M, et al. Geographic variation in hospice use prior to death. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1117-1125.
8. Lackan NA, Ostir GV, Freeman JL, et al. Decreasing variation in the use of hospice among older adults with breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancer. Med Care. 2004;42:116-122.
9. US Congressional Report. Hospice Care in Medicare: Recent Trends and a Review of the Issues. Washington, DC: MedPAC; 2004.
10. Virnig BA, Ma H, Hartman LK, et al. Access to home-based hospice care for rural populations: identification of areas lacking service. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:1292-1299.
11. Iwashyna TJ, Chang VW, Zhang JX, et al. The lack of effect of market structure on hospice use. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1531-1551.
12. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. The economics of dying. The illusion of cost savings at the end of life. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:540-544.
13. Bach PB, Schrag D, Begg CB. Resurrecting treatment histories of dead patients: a study design that should be laid to rest. JAMA. 2004;292:2765-2770.
14. Dartmouth Medical School, Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences. Quality of care in the last 6 months of life. In: Wennberg JE, Cooper MM, eds. The Quality of Medical Care in the United States: A Report on the Medicare Program. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 1999. Chicago, IL: AHA Press; 1999.
15. Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB, et al. Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:315-321.
16. Pritchard RS, Fisher ES, Teno JM, et al. Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death. SUPPORT investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for risks and outcomes of treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1242-1250.
17. Teno JM, Mor V, Ward N, et al. Bereaved family member perceptions of quality of end-of-life care in U.S. regions with high and low usage of intensive care unit care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1905-1911.
18. Lynn J, Teno JM, Phillips RS, et al. Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients. SUPPORT investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:97-106.