Assessing the applicability of the Structured Expert Evaluation Method (SEEM) for a wider age group

Proceeding of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC '06

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 73-80

  Baauw, Ester ^a   Bekker, Mathilde M ^a   Markopoulos, Panos ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Analytical evaluation methods; Children; Educational computer games; Fun; SEEM; Usability

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL MOTION PICTURES; EXPERT SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EDUCATIONAL COMPUTER GAMES; PREDICTIVE EVALUATION METHODS; STRUCTURED EXPERT EVALUATION METHOD (SEEM);

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 34247346083     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1139073.1139095     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bio Mania - Een speelse toepassing op biologie (Bio Mania - a playful application to biology) [Computer software] Edison (1998)
2. Max en de toverstenen (Milo and the magical stones) [Computer software] MediaMix Benelux (2002)
3. Regenboog, de mooiste vis van de zee (Rainbow, the most beautiful fish in the ocean) [Computer software] MediaMix Benelux (2002)
4. Baauw, E. and Bekker, M.M.: A comparison of two analytical evaluation methods for children's computer games. Position paper for workshop: Child Computer Interaction: Methodological research, Interact 2005, 12 September 2005 Rome, Italy (2005)
5. Baauw, E., Bekker, M.M., and Barendregt, W.: A Structured Expert Evaluation Method for the Evaluation of Children's Computer Games. Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT 2005, 14 September 2005 Rome, Springer Verlag (2005)
6. Baauw, E. and Markopoulos, P.: A comparison of think aloud and post-task interview. 1 June 2004 Maryland, USA, ACM Press (2004) 115-117
7. Barendregt, W., Bekker, M.M., Bouwhuis, D., and Baauw, E.: Predicting effectiveness of children participants in user testing based on personality characteristics. Behaviour & Information Technology (in press)
8. Barendregt, W., Bekker, M.M., and Speerstra, M.: Empirical evaluation of usability and fun in computer games for children. Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT-03', 9 March 2003 Zürich, Switzerland, IOP Press (2003) 705-708
9. Chattratichart, J. and Brodie, J.: Applying User Testing Data to UEM Performance Metrics. Late Breaking Results Paper, 24 April 2004 Vienna, Austria (2004) 1119-1122
10. Cockton, G. and Woolrych, A.: Understanding Inspection Methods: Lessons from an Assessment of Heuristic Evaluation. In: Blandford, A., Vanderdonckt, J., and Gray, P.D. (Eds.): Springer-Verlag (2001) 171-192
11. Hartson, H.R., Andre, T.S., and Williges, R.C.: Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction: Special issue on Empirical Evaluation of Information Visualisations, 13(4) (2001) 373-410
12. Inkpen, K.: Three Important Research Agendas for Educational Multimedia: Learning, Children, and Gender. Proceedings of Educational MultiMedia '97, June 1997, Calgary (1997) 521-526
13. Lavery, D., Cockton, G., and Atkinson, M.P.: Comparison of Evaluation Methods Using Structured Usability Problem Reports. Behaviour and Information Technology, 16(4) (1997) 246-266
14. Malone, T.W.: What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer gamesTechnical Report CIS-7, Xerox PARC, Palo Alto (1980)
15. Malone, T.W. and Lepper, M.R.: Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow, R.E. and Farr, M.J. (Eds.): Aptitude, Learning and Interaction III Cognitive and Affective Process Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum (1987)
16. Nielsen, J.: Heuristic Evaluation. In: Nielsen, J. and Mack, R.L. (Eds.): Usability Inspection Methods. New York, USA, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1994) 25-62
17. Norman, D.A.: The design of everyday things. London, MIT Press (1998)
18. Piaget, J.: Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York, Orion Press (1970)
19. Sears, A.: Heuristic Walkthroughs: Finding the problems without the noise. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3) (1997) 213-234