Pseudo-characteristic formulation and dynamic boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 201-227

  Lu, Shang Yi ^a   Sagaut, Pierre ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Boundary conditions; Computational aeroacoustics; Euler equation; Numerical scheme

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE PROPAGATION; ATMOSPHERIC ACOUSTICS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; WIND;

COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTICS; EULER EQUATION; PSEUDO-CHARACTERISTIC FORMULATION;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

ACOUSTIC WAVE PROPAGATION; ATMOSPHERIC ACOUSTICS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; WIND;

EID: 33845945404     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1276     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Wagner C, Hüttl T, Sagaut P. Large-Eddy Simulation for Acoustics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 2006.
2. Terracol M, Manoha E, Herrero C, Labourasse E, Redonnet S, Sagaut P. Hybrid methods for airframe noise numerical prediction. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 2005; 19:197-227.
3. Tam CKW, Webb JC. Dispersion-relation preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 107:262-281.
4. Tam CKW. Computational aeroacoustics: issues and methods. AIAA Journal 1995; 33(10):1788-1796.
5. Lele SK. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. Journal of Computational Physics 1992; 103:16-42.
6. Sengupta TK, Sircar SK, Dipankar A. High accuracy schemes for DNS and acoustics. Journal of Scientific Computing 2006; 26:151-194.
7. Sengupta TK, Jain R, Dipankar A. A new flux-vector splitting compact finite volume scheme. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 207:261-281.
8. Kamiadakis G, Sherwin SJ. Spectral/HP Element Method for Computational Fluid Dynamics. Oxford Science Publications: Oxford, U.K.
9. Cockburn B, Kamiadakis GE, Shu CW. Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Theory, Computation and Applications. Springer: Berlin.
10. Burbeau A, Sagaut P, Bruneau CH. An improved limiter for higher-order RKDG methods. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 169:115-150.
11. Burbeau A, Sagaut P. Simulation of a viscous compressible flow pas a circular cylinder with high-order discontinuous Galerkin methods. Computers and Fluids 2002; 31(8):867-889.
12. Ekaterinaris JA. High-order accurate, low numerical diffusion methods for aerodynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 2005; 41:192-300.
13. Sesterhenn J. A characteristic-type formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations for high order upwind schemes. Computers and Fluids 2001; 30:37-67.
14. Vichnevetsky R, Bowles JB. Fourier Analysis of Numerical Approximations of Hyperbolic Equations. SIAM Studies in Applied Mathematics. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA.
15. Tam CKW, Auriault L. Time-domain impedance boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA Journal 1996; 34(5):917-923.
16. Fung KY, Ju H, Tallapragada B. Impedance and its time-domain extensions. AIAA Journal 2000; 38(1):30-38.
17. Fung KY, Ju H. Time-domain impedance boundary conditions with mean flow effects. AIAA Journal 2001; 39(9):1683-1690.
18. Zhuang M, Chen RF. Applications of higher-order optimized upwind schemes for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA Journal 2002; 40(3):443-449.
19. Shu CW, Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes II. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 83:32-78.
20. Kovasznay LSG. Turbulence in supersonic flow. Journal of the Aeronautical Society 1953; 20(10):657-682.
21. Motsinger RE, Kraft RE. Design and Performance of Duct Acoustic Performance. Aeroacoustics of Flight Vehicles: Theory and Practice, Table 1, p. 184 (Chapter 14).