Mixture models as a method to find present and divergent genes in comparative genomic hybridization studies on bacteria

Biometrical Journal

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 242-258

  Feten, Guri ^a   Almøy, Trygve ^a   Snipen, Lars ^a   Aakra, Ågot ^a   Nyquist, O Ludvig ^a   Aastveit, Are H ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Analysis of variance; Comparative genomic hybridization; Microarray experiment; Mixture models; Validation criteria

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GENERATED HOLOGRAPHY; GENES; MICROARRAYS;

ANALYSE OF VARIANCE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATIONS; DATA SET; DIVERGENT GENES; GENOMIC DIVERSITY; MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS; MIXTURE MODELING; NUMBER OF COMPONENTS; REFERENCE STRAINS; VALIDATION CRITERIA;

BACTERIA;

EID: 34247326891     PISSN: 03233847     EISSN: 15214036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200510286     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Autio, R., Hautaniemi, S., Kauraniemi, P., Yli-Harja, O., Astola, J., Wolf, M., and Kallioniemi, A. (2003). CGH-plotter: MATLAB toolbox for CGH-data analysis. Bioinformatics 19, 1714-1715.
2. Behr, M. A., Wilson, M. A., Gill, W. P., Salamon, H., Schoolnik, G. K., Rane, S., and Small, P. M. (1999). Comparative genomics of BCG vaccines by whole-genome DNA microarray. Science 284, 1520-1532.
3. Björkholm, B., Lundin, A., Sillen, A., Guillemin, K., Salama, N., Rubio, C., Gordon, J. I., Falk, P., and Engstrand, L. (2001). Comparison of genetic divergence and fitness between two subclones of Helicobacter pylori. Infection and Immunity 69, 7832-7838.
4. Carothers, A. D. (1997). A likelihood-based approach to the estimation of relative DNA copy number by comparative genomic hybridization. Bioinformatics 53, 848-856.
5. Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 829-836.
6. Dempster, A. P, Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B - Statistical Methodology 39, 1-38.
7. Dziejman, M., Balon, E., Boyd, D., Fraser, C. M., Heidelberg, J. F., and Mekalanos, J. J. (2002). Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio cholerae: genes that correlate with cholera endemic and pandemic disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 1556-1561.
8. Feten, G., Almøy, T., and Aastveit, A.H. (2005). Prediction of missing values in microarray and use of mixed models to evaluate the predictors. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 4, No. 1, Article 10. http://www.bepress.com/sagmb/vol4/iss1/art10.
9. Feten, G., Almøy, T., Snipen, L., Aakra, Å., and Aastveit, A. H. (2006). Regression as a method to predict copy numbers in comparative genomic hybridization studies on bacteria. Biometrical Journal 48, 255-270.
10. Fridlyand, J., Snijders, A., Pinkel, D., Albertson, D., and Jain, A. (2003). Statistical issues in the analysis of the array CGH data. Proceedings of the Computational Systems Bioinformatics, 407-408.
11. Indahl, U. G., and Naes, T. (1998). Evaluation of alternative spectral feature extraction methods of textural images for multivariate modeling. Journal of Chemometrics 12, 261-278.
12. Irizarry, R. A., Ooi, S. L., Wu, Z., and Boeke, J. D. (2003). Use of mixture models in a microarray-based screening procedure for detecting differentially represented yeast mutants. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2, No. 1, Article 1. http://www.bepress.com/sagmb/vol2/iss1/art1.
13. Kim, C. C., Joyce, E. A., Chan, K., and Falkow, S. (2002). Improved analytical methods for microarray-based genome-composition analysis. Genome Biology 3, research 0065.1-0065.17.
14. Kubat, M., Holte, R., and Matwin, S. (1998). Machine learning for the detection of oil spills in satellite radar images. Machine Learning 30, 195-215.
15. Lee, M.-L. T., Kuo, F. C., Whitmore, G. A., and Sklar, J. (2000). Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: Statistical methods and evidence from repetetive cDNA hybridizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 9834-9839.
16. Lewin, B. (2000). Genes VII. Oxford University Press Inc., New York.
17. Lindman, H. R. (1992). Analysis of Variance in Experimental Design. Springer-Verlag, New York.
18. McLachlan, G. J., Do, K.-A., and Ambroise, C. (2004). Analyzing Microarray Gene Expression Data. John Wiley & Sons.
19. McLachlan, G. J. and Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. John Wiley & Sons.
20. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T., and Bibby, J. M. (1979). Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, London.
21. Montgomery, D. C. (1997). Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons.
22. Moore, D. H., Pallavicini, M., Cher, M. L., and Gray, J. W. (1997). A t-statistic for objective interpretation of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) profiles. Cytometry 28, 183-190.
23. Murray, A. E., Lies, D., Li, G., Nealson, K., Zhou, J., and Tiedje, J. M. (2001). DNA/DNA hybridization to microarrays reveals gene-specific differences between closely related microbial genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 9853-9858.
24. Nguyen, D. V., Arpat, A. B., Wang, N. Y., and Carroll, R. J. (2002). DNA Microarray Experiments: Biological and Technological Aspects. Biometrics 58, 701-717.
25. Peng, D. F., Sugihara, H., Sho, K., Mukaisho, K., Tsubosa, Y., and Hattori, T. (2003). Alterations of chromosomal copy number during progression of diffuse-type gastric carcinomas: metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization analyses of multiple samples from individual tumours. Journal of Pathology 201, 439-450.
26. Pollack, J. R., Perou, C. M., Alizadeh, A. A., Eisen, M. B., Pergamenschikov, A., Williams, C. F., Jeffrey, S. S., Botstein, D., and Brown, P. O. (1999). Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nature Genetics 23, 41-46.
27. Pollack, J. R., Sortie, T., Perou, C. M., Rees, C. A., Jeffrey, S. S., Lonning, P. E., Tibshirani, R., Botstein, D., Borresen-Dale, A. L., and Brown, P. O. (2002). Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 12963-12968.
28. Repsilber, D., Mira, A., Lindroos, H., Andersson, S., and Ziegler, A. (2005). Data rotation improves genomotyping efficiency. Biometrical Journal 47, 585-598.
29. Salama, N., Guillemin, K., McDaniel, T. K., Sherlock, G., Tompkins, L., and Falkow, S. (2000). A whole-genome microarray reveals genetic diversity among Helicobacter pylori strains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 14668-14673.
30. Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285-1293.
31. Veltman, J. A., Fridlyand, J., Pejavar, S., Olshen, A. B., Korkola, J. E., DeVries, S., Carroll, P., Kuo, W. L., Pinkel, D., Albertson, D., Cordon-Cardo, C., Jain, A. N., and Waldman, F. M. (2003). Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for genome-wide screening of DNA copy number in bladder tumors. Cancer Research 63, 2872-2880.
32. Wang, Y. D. and Guo, S. W. (2004). Statistical methods for detecting genomic alterations through array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Frontiers in Bioscience 9, 540-549.