Foveal versus parafoveal scanpaths of visual imagery in virtual hemianopic subjects

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 975-982

  Zangemeister, Wolfgang H ^a   Liman, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abstract versus realistic pictures; Markov analysis; Scanpath eye movements; String editing; Virtual hemiblindness; Visual imagery

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; EYE MOVEMENTS; MARKOV PROCESSES; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION;

ABSTRACT VERSUS REALISTIC PICTURES; SCANPATH EYE MOVEMENTS; STRING EDITING; VIRTUAL HEMIBLINDNESS; VISUAL IMAGERY;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

COMPUTERS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HEMIANOPSIA; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SACCADES; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34247277184     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Noton D., and Stark L.W. Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science 171 (1971) 308-311
2. Stark L.W., and Choi Y.S. Experimental metaphysics: the scanpath as an epistemological mechanism. In: Zangemeister W.H., et al. (Ed). Visual Attention and Cognition (1996), Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam 3-69
3. Zangemeister W.H., Sherman K., and Stark L. Evidence for global scanpath strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images. Neuropsychologia 33 (1995) 1009-1025
4. Zangemeister W.H., Oechsner U., and Freksa C. Short-term adaptation of eye movements in patients with visual hemifield defects indicates high level control of human scanpath. Optom. Vis. Sci. 72 (1995) 467-477
5. Stark L.W., et al. Representation of human vision in the brain: how does human perception recognize images?. J. Electron. Imaging 10 (2001) 123-151
6. Stark L.W., and Ellis S. Scanpaths revisited: cognitive models in active looking. In: Fisher B., Monty C., and Sanders M. (Eds). Eye Movements Cognition and Visual Perception (1981), Erlbaum Press, New Jersey 193-226
7. Hacisalihzade S.S., Stark L.W., and Allen J.S. Visual perception and sequences of eye movement fixations: a stochastic modeling approach. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybern. 22 (1992) 474-481
8. Chernyak D.A., and Stark L.W. Top-down guided eye movements. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybern. 31 (2001) 514-522
9. Ellis S.R., and Stark L. Eye movements during viewing of Necker cubes. Perception 7 (1978) 575-581
10. Butter C.M., Kosslyn S., Mijovic-Prelec D., and Riffle A. Field-specific deficits in visual imagery following hemianopia due to unilateral occipital infarcts. Brain 120 (1997) 217-228
11. Gassel M.M., and Wiliams D. Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Part 2. Oculomotor mechanisms. Brain 86 (1963) 1-36
12. W. Poppelreuter, Die psychischen Schädigungen durch Kopfschuß im Kriege, in: Die Störungen der niederen und höheren Sehleistungen durch Verletzungen des Okzipitalhirns, vol. 1, Voss, Leipzig, 1917.
13. Teuber H.L., Battersby W., and Bender M.B. Visual Field Defects After Penetrating Missile Wounds of the Brain (1960), MIT Press, Cambridge
14. Zihl J. Recovery of visual functions in patients with cerebral blindness: effect of specific practice with saccadic localization. Exp. Brain Res. 44 (1981) 159-169
15. Meienberg O., Zangemeister W.H., Hoyt W.F., and Stark L.W. Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Ann. Neurol. 9 (1981) 537-544
16. Schoepf D., and Zangemeister W.H. Correlation of coordinated gaze strategies to the status of adaptation in patients with hemianopic visual field defects. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 682 (1993) 404-409
17. Zangemeister W.H., Meienberg O., Stark L., and Hoyt W.F. Eye-head coordination in homonymous hemianopia. J. Neurol. 225 (1982) 243-254
18. Zangemeister W.H., and Stark L. Gaze latency: variable interactions of eye and head movements in gaze. Exp. Neurol. 75 (1982) 389-406
19. Zangemeister W.H., Poppensieker K., and Hoekendorf H. Cognitive Neurovisual Rehabilitation using Coordinated Gaze Strategies (1999), Shaker Publ., Aachen
20. Brandt S., and Stark L.W. Spontaneous Eye Movements During Visual Imagery Reflect the Content of the Visual Scene. J. Cognit. Neurosci 9 (1997) 27-38
21. Chatterjee A., and Southwood M.H. Cortical blindness and visual imagery. Neurology 45 (1995) 2189-2195
22. Gbadamosi J., and Zangemeister W.H. Visual imagery in hemianopic patients. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 13 7 (2001) 45-56
23. Kosslyn S.M., Alpert L.M., Thopson W.L., Maljkovic V., Weise S.B., Chabris C.F., et al. Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: PET investigations. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 5 (1993) 263-287
24. Kosslyn S. MImage and Brain (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Goldenberg G., Poderka I., Steiner M., Suess E., and Deecke L. Regional cerebral blood flow patterns in visual imagery. Neuropsychologia 27 (1989) 641-664
26. Roland P.E., Gulyas B., Roland P.E., and Gulyas B. Visual imagery and visual representation. Trends Neurosci. 17 7 (2004) 281-287
27. Roland P.E., Gulyas B., Roland P.E., and Gulyas B. Visual representations of scenes and objects: retinotopical or non-retinotopical. Trends Neurosci. 17 7 (1994) 294-297
28. Zeki S. A Vision of the Brain (1999), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford pp. 22-32
29. Zangemeister W.H., Dannheim F., and Kunze K. Adaption of gaze to eccentric fixation in homonymous hemianopia. In: Keller E.L., and Zee D.S. (Eds). Adaptive Processes in Visual and Oculomotor Systems (1986), Pergamon Press, Oxford
30. W.H. Zangemeister, Virtual reality hemianopic scotomas induce eccentric fixation: scanpath strategies to optimize high level vision in healthy subjects, IEEE 97CH36136EMBS, 1997, pp. 560-565.
31. Zangemeister W.H., and Oechsner U. Adaptation to visual field defects with virtual reality scotoma in healthy subjects. In: Becker, et al. (Ed). Current Oculomotor Research (1999), Plenum Press, New York 89-95
32. Zangemeister W.H., and Utz P. An increase in a virtual hemianopic field enhances the efficiency of secondary adaptive gaze strategies. Curr. Psychol. Cognit. 21 (2002) 281-303
33. Rossi P.W., Kheyfets S., and Reding M.J. Fresnel prisms improve visual perception in stroke patients with homonymous hemianopia or unilateral visual neglect. Neurology 40 (1990) 1597-1599
34. Pommerenke K., and Markowitsch H.J. Rehabilitation training of homonymous visual field defects in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system. Restorative Neurol. Neurosci. 1 (1989) 47-63
35. Taub E., et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 4 (1993) 347-354