An increase in a virtual hemianopic field defect enhances the efficiency of secondary adaptive gaze strategies

Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive

Volumn 21, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 281-303

  Zangemeister, Wolfgang H ^a   Utz, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hemianopia rehabilitation; Homonymous hemianopia; Scanpath eye movements; Virtual hemianopia simulation; Visual attention; Visual feedback training

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038505654     PISSN: 02499185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Brandt, S., Ploner, C., Meyer, B.-U., Leistner, S., & Villringer, A. (1998). Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over dorsolateral prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex on memory-guided saccades. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 197-204.
2. Brandt, S., & Stark, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 27-38.
3. Butter, C. M., Kosslyn, S., Mijovic-Prelec, D., & Riffle, A. (1997). Field-specific deficits in visual imagery following hemianopia due to unilateral occipital infarcts. Brain, 120, 217-228.
4. Chatterjee, A., & Southwood, M. H. (1995). Cortical blindness and visual imagery. Neurology, 45, 2189-2195.
5. Chernyak, D. A.,. & Stark, L. W. (2001). Top-down guided eye movements. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 31, 514-522.
6. Ellis, S. R., & Stark, L. (1978). Eye movements during viewing of Necker cubes. Perception, 7, 575-581.
7. Farah, M., Peronnet, F., Gonon, M. A., & Girard, M. H. (1988). Electro-physiological evidence for a shared representional medium for visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 248-257.
8. Farah, M., & Ratcliff, G. (1994). The neuropsychology of high-level vision. Collected tutorial essays. London: Blackwell Publ.
9. Gassel, M. M., & Wiliams, D. (1963). Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Part 2. Oculomotor mechanisms. Brain, 86, 1-36.
10. Gbadamosi, J., & Zangemeister, W. H. (2001). Visual imagery in hemianopic patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 45-56.
11. Goldenberg, G., Poderka, I., Steiner, M., Suess, E., & Deecke, L. (1989). Regional cerebral blood flow patterns in visual imagery. Neuropsychologia, 27, 641-664.
12. Goldenberg, G. (1993). The neural basis of mental imagery. Review. Baillieres Clinical Neurology, 2, 265-286.
13. Hacisalihzade, S. S., Stark, L. W., & Allen, J. S. (1992). Visual perception and sequences of eye movement fixations: A stochastic modeling approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 474-481.
14. Hier, D. B., Mondlock, J., & Caplan, L. R. (1983). Recovery of behavioural abnormalities after right hemisphere stroke. Neurology, 33, 345-350.
15. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, L. M., Thompson, W. L., Maljkovic, V., Weise, S. B., Chabris, C. F., Hamilton, S. E., Rauch, S. L., & Buonanno, F. S. (1993). Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: PET investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 263-287.
17. Kosslyn, S. M., & Shin, L. M. (1994). Visual mental images in the brain: Current issues. In M. Farah & G. Ratcliff (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision (pp. 269-296). London: Blackwell Publ.
18. Meienberg, O. (1983). Clinical examination of saccadic eye movements in hemianopia. Neurology, 33, 1311-1315.
19. Meienberg, O., Zangemeister, W. H., Hoyt, W. F., & Stark, L. W. (1981). Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Annals of Neurolology, 9, 537-544.
20. Messing, B, & Gänshirt, H. (1986). Spontanverlauf vaskulärer, retrogenikulärer Gesichtsfeldstörungen. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologie, 228-236.
21. Noton, D., & Stark, L. W. (1971a). Eye movements and visual perception. Scientific American, 224, 34-43.
22. Noton, D., & Stark, L. W. (1971b). Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science, 171, 308-311.
23. Pommerenke, K., & Markowitsch, H. J. (1989). Rehabilitation training of homonymous visual field defects in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 1, 47-63.
24. Poppelreuter, W. (1917). Die psychischen Schädigungen durch Kopfschuß im Kriege Vol. 1: Die Störungen der niederen und höheren Sehleistungen durch Verletzungen des Okzipitalhirns. Leipzig: Voss.
25. Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W., (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements? Vision Research, 16, 829-837.
26. Riddoch, G. (1917). Dissociation in visual perception due to occipital injuries, with special reference to appreciation of movement. Brain, 40, 15-57.
27. Roland, P. E., & Gulyas, B. (1994a). Visual imagery and visual representation. Trends in Neuroscience, 17, 281-287.
28. Roland, P. E. & Gulyas, B. (1994b). Visual representations of scenes and objects: retinotopical or non-retinotopical? Trends in Neuroscience, 17, 294-297.
29. Rossi, P. W., Kheyfets, S., & Reding, M. J. (1990). Fresnel prisms improve visual perception in stroke patients with homonymous hemianopia or unilateral visual neglect. Neurology, 40, 1597-1599.
30. Schoepf, D., & Zangemeister, W. H. (1993). Correlation of coordinated gaze strategies to the status of adaptation in patients with hemianopic visual field defects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 404-409.
31. Stark, L. W., & Choi, Y. S. (1996). Experimental metaphysics: The scanpath as an epistemological mechanism. In W. H. Zangemeister et al. (Eds.), Visual attention and cognition (pp. 3-69). Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.
32. Stark, L. W., & Ellis, S. (1981). Scanpaths revisited: Cognitive models in active looking. In B. Fisher, C., Monty, & M. Sanders (Eds.), Eye movements, cognition and visual perception (pp. 193-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Press.
33. Stark, L. W., & Privitera, C. (2001). Representation of human vision in the brain: How does human perception recognize images? Journal of Electronic Imaging, 10, 123-151.
34. Taub, E. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 347-354.
35. Teuber, H. L., Battersby, W., & Bender, M. B. (1960). Visual field defects after penetrating missile wounds of the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-112
37. Zangemeister, W. H. (1997). Virtual reality hemianopic scotomas induce eccentric fixation: Scanpath strategies to optimize high level vision in healthy subjects. IEEE Proceedings of EMBS, 97CH36136EMBS, 560-565.
38. Zangemeister, W. H., Canavan, A. G. M., & Hoemberg, V. (1995a). Frontal and parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) disturbs programming of saccadic eye movements. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 133, 42-52.
39. Zangemeister, W. H., Dannheim, F., & Kunze, K. (1986). Adaptation of gaze to eccentric fixation in homonymous hemianopia. In E. L. Keller & D. S. Zee (Eds.), Adaptive processes in visual and oculomotor systems. London: Pergamon Press.
40. Zangemeister, W. H., Meienberg, O., Stark, L., & Hoyt, W. F. (1982). Eye-head coordination in homonymous hemianopia. Journal of Neurology, 225, 243-254.
41. Zangemeister, W. H., & Oechsner, U. (1996). Evidence for scanpaths in hemianopic patients shown through string editing methods. In W. H. Zangemeister et al. (Eds.), Visual attention and cognition (pp. 197-221). Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.
42. Zangemeister, W. H., & Oechsner, U. (1999). Adaptation to visual field defects with virtual reality scotoma in healthy subjects. In Becker et al. (Eds.), Current oculomotor research (pp. 89-95). New York: Plenum Press.
43. Zangemeister, W. H., Oechsner, U., & Freksa, C. (1995b). Short-term adaptation of eye movements in patients with visual hemifield defects indicates high level control of human scanpath. Optometry and Visual Sciences, 72, 467-477.
44. Zangemeister, W. H., Poppensieker, K., & Hoekendorf, H. (1999). Cognitive neurovisual rehabilitation using coordinated gaze strategies. Aachen: Shaker Publ.
45. Zangemeister, W. H., Sherman, K., & Stark, L. (1995c). Evidence for global Scanpath strategy in viewing abstract compared with realistic images. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1009-1025.
46. Zangemeister W. H., & Stark, L. (1982). Gaze latency: variable interactions of eye and head movements in gaze. Experimental Neurology, 75, 389-406
47. Zeki, S. (1978). Uniformity and diversity of structure and function in rhesus monkey prestriate cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 277, 273-290.
48. Zeki, S. (1983). The distribution of wavelength and orientation selective cells in different areas of monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London (Biology), 217, 449-470.
49. Zeki, S. (1999). A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
50. Zihl, J. (1981). Recovery of visual functions in patients with cerebral blindness: Effect of specific practice with saccadic localization. Experimental Brain Research, 44, 159-169.
51. Zihl, J. (1988). Homonyme Hemianopsie und ihre Rehabilitation. Kl. Monatsblätter. Augenheilkunde, 192, 555-558.