The 'publicness' of public organizations

Public Administration

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 337-357

  Antonsen, Marianne ^a   Beck Jørgensen, Torben ^b  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011140223     PISSN: 00333298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00064     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allison, G.T. 1983. 'Public and private management: are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant particulars?' in R.T. Golembiewsky and F. Gibson (eds.), Readings in public administration. Boston: Little Brown.
2. Antonsen, M. 1993. 'Accept og betydning af statens administrative reformer set i lyset af organisationernes forankring i den offentlige sektor og deres relationer til omgivelserne', Økonomistyring og Informatik, 8, 4, 195-215.
3. Barker, A. (ed.). 1982. Quangos in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Beck Jørgensen, T. 1991. 'Theory of public organisations - demands and possibilities of development', in Tim Knudsen (ed.), Welfare administration in Denmark. Copenhagen: Ministry of Finance.
5. _. 1995. 'Rescuing public service: on the tasks of public organisations', in H. Hill, H. Klages and E. Löffler (eds.), Quality, innovation and measurement in the public sector. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
6. Birkinshaw, P., I. Harden and N. Lewis. 1990. Government by moonlight? The hybrid parts of the state. London: Unwin Hyman.
7. Blau, P.M. and W.R. Scott. 1963. Formal organizations: a comparative approach. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8. Bozeman, B. 1987. All organizations are public: bridging public and private organizational theories. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
9. Bozeman, B. and S. Bretschneider. 1994. 'The "publicness puzzle" in organization theory: a test of alternative explanations of differences between public and private organizations', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4, 2, 197-224.
10. Brunsson, N. 1989. The organization of hypocrisy: talk, decisions and actions in organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
11. Burns, T. and G.M. Stalker. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
12. Frederickson, H.G. 1991. Toward a theory of the public for public administration', Administration and Society, 22, 4, 395-417.
13. Gortner, H.F.J. Mahler and J.B. Nicholson. 1987. Organization theory: a public perspective. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
14. Harmon, M. and R. Mayer. 1986. Organization theory for public administration. Boston: Little Brown.
15. Heffron, F. 1989. Organization theory and public organizations: the political connection. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
16. Hood, C. 1986. 'The hidden public sector: the quango-cratization of the world', in F-X. Kaufmann, G. Majone and V. Ostrom (eds.), Guidance, control and evaluation in the public sector. Berlin: de Gruyter.
17. _. 1991. 'A public management for all seasons?', Public Administration, 69, 1, 3-19.
18. Hood, C. and G.F. Schuppert (eds.). 1988. Delivering public service in Western Europe. Sharing Western European experiences of para-governmental organisations. London: Sage.
19. Kickert, W.J. and T. Beck Jørgensen (eds.). 1995. 'Symposium on management reform: executive agencies and core departments', International Review of Administrative Sciences, 61, 4.
20. Kooiman, J. and M. van Vliet. 1993. 'Governance and public management', in K.A. Eliassen and J. Kooiman (eds.), Managing public organizations. Lessons from contemporary European experience. London: Sage.
21. Lawrence, P.R. and J.W. Lorsch. 1967. Organizations and environments. Managing differentiation and integration. Homewood: Irwin.
22. Lawson, A. and A. Rose. 1994. Organisation and management in the public sector. London: Pitman Publishing.
23. March, J. and J.P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
24. Meyer, J.W. and B. Rowan. 1977. 'Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony', American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-63.
25. Milward, H.B., K.G. Provan and B.A. Else. 1993. 'What does the "hollow state" look like?', in B. Bozeman (ed.), Public management: the state of the art. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
26. Mintzberg, H. 1983. Structures in fives: designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
27. Peters, B.G. 1993. 'Managing the hollow state', in K.A. Eliassen and J. Kooiman (eds.), Managing public organizations. London: Sage.
28. Powell, W.W. and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.). 1991. The new institutionalism in organization analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Rainey, H.G. 1983. 'Public organization theory: the rising challenge', Public Administration Review 43, 2, 176-81.
30. _. 1984. 'Organization theory and political science: organizational typologies, political variables, and policy studies', Policy Studies Journal 13, 1, 5-22.
31. _. 1996. Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
32. Rhodes, R.A.W. 1987. 'Developing the public service orientation, or let's add a soupçon of political theory', Local Government Studies 13, May/June, 63-73.
33. _. 1994. 'The hollowing out of the state: the changing nature of the public service in Britain', Political Quarterly 65, 2, 138-51.
34. Scott, W.R. and J.W. Meyer. 1994. Institutional environments and organizations. London: Sage.
35. Smith, J. 1991. 'The public service ethos', Public Administration 69 (Winter), 515-23.
36. Strehl, F. 1995. 'Public administration reforms: actual characteristics and tendencies', in H. Hill and H. Klages (eds.), Trends in public sector renewal. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
37. Thompson, J.D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Weick, K.E. 1969. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
39. Weir, S. and W. Hall (eds.). 1994. EGO-trip. Extra-governmental organisations in the United Kingdom and their accountability. London: Charter '88 Trust.