Analysis of a high-throughput screening data set using potency-scaled molecular similarity algorithms

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 367-375

  Vogt, Ingo ^a   Bajorath, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DRUG PRODUCTS; ENZYME INHIBITION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PHARMACOKINETICS;

CATHEPSIN; DATA SETS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING (HTS); SCALING FUNCTIONS;

DATA MINING;

CATHEPSIN B; ENZYME INHIBITOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG ANTAGONISM; DRUG SCREENING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; CATHEPSIN B; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; ENZYME INHIBITORS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 34247250736     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci6005432     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Esposito, E. X.; Hopfinger, A. J.; Madura, J. D. Methods for Applying the Quantitative Structure - Activity Relationship Paradigm. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004, 275, 131-214.
2. Mason, J. S.; Good, A. C.; Martin, E. J. 3-D Pharmacophores in Drug Discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2001, 7, 567-597.
3. Johnson, M.; Maggiora, G. M. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1990.
4. Maggiora, G. M. On Outliers and Activity Cliffs - Why QSAR Often Disappoints. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1535-1535.
5. Hopfinger, A. J.; Reaka, A.; Venkatarangan, P.; Duca, J. S.; Wang, S. Construction of a Virtual High Throughput Screen by 4D-QSAR Analysis: Application to a Combinatorial Library of Glucose Inhibitors of Glycogen Phosphorylase b. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1151-1160.
6. Bajorath, J. Integration of Virtual and High-Throughput Screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 882-894.
7. Mason, J. S.; Morize, I.; Menard, P. R.; Cheney, D. L.; Hulme, C.; Labaudiniere, R. F. New 4-Point Pharmacophore Method for Molecular Similarity and Diversity Applications: Overview over the Method and Applications, including a Novel Approach to the Design of Combinatorial Libraries Containing Privileged Substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3251-3264.
8. Bajorath, J. Virtual Screening: Methods, Expectations, and Reality. Curr. Drug Discovery 2002, 2 (3), 24-28.
9. Godden, J. W.; Futt, J. R.; Xue, L.; Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. Molecular Similarity Analysis and Virtual Screening in Binary-Transformed Chemical Descriptor Spaces with Variable Dimensionality. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 21-29.
10. Godden, J. W.; Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. POT-DMC - A Virtual Screening Method for the Identification of Potent Hits. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4286-4290.
11. Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. A Distance Function for Retrieval of Active Molecules from Complex Chemical Space Representations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1094-1097.
12. Godden, J. W.; Xue, L.; Kitchen, D. B.; Stahura, F. L.; Schermerhom, E. J.; Bajorath, J. Median Partitioning: A Novel Method for the Selection of Representative Subsets from Large Compound Pools. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 885-893.
13. The Penn Center for Molecular Discovery (PCMD). http://www.seas.upenn. edu/~pcmd/ (accessed Jan 2007).
14. AID 453 - PubChem BioAssay Summary, http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm-.nih.gov/ assay/assay.cgi?aid=453#aLinks (accessed Jan 2007).
15. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
16. MACCS Structural Keys; MDL Elsevier: San Leandro, CA. http:// www.mdl.com (accessed Sep 1, 2006).
17. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE); Chemical Computing Group Inc.: Montreal, Canada, http://www.chemcomp.com (accessed Feb 1, 2006).
18. Martin, Y. C.; Kofron, J. L.; Traphagen, L. M. Do Structurally Similar Molecules Have Similar Biological Activity? J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4350-4358.
19. Kubinyi, H. Similarity and Dissimilarity - A Medicinal Chemist's View. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1998, 11, 225-252.
20. Bajorath, J. Integration of Virtual and High-Throughput Screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 882-894.
21. Bender, A.; Glen, R. C. Molecular Similarity: A Key Technique in Molecular Informatics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3204-3218.
22. Parker, C. N. McMaster University Data-Mining and Docking Competition: Computational Models on the Catwalk. J. Biomol. Screening 2005, 10, 647-648.
23. Parker, C. N.; Shamu, C. E.; Kraybill, B.; Austin, C. P.; Bajorath, J. Measure, Mine, Model, Manipulate: The Future for HTS and Chemoinformatics? Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11, 863-865.
24. Pavlidis, P.; Nobel, W. S. Matrix2png: A Utility for Visualizing Matrix Data. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 295-296.