Simultaneous renewal through professional development school partnerships

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 100, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 211-225

  Shroyer, Gail ^a   Yahnke, Sally ^a   Bennett, Andrew ^a   Dunn, Cindi ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

K 12 teaching and learning; Professional development school partnerships; Simultaneous renewal; University teacher preparation program

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247228560     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOER.100.4.211-225     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. American Council on Education. (1999). To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught. Washington DC: Author.
4. Bernstein, D. J. (1996). A departmental system for balancing the development and evaluation of college teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 20, 241-248.
5. Bolick, M. E. (1996). Socialization influences of the elementary environment on a beginning teacher prepared as a conseructivist educator: An interpretive case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
6. Burry-Stock, J. (1993). The expert science teaching educational evaluation model (ESTEEM) Manual. Kalamazoo, MI: Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, Western Michigan University.
7. Clinton, B. (1997). President Clinton's call to action for American education in the 21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED468585)
8. Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice, and politics in teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
9. Cooper, C. K. (1995). Qualitative analysis of preservice elementary teachers' scientific ways of thinking, attitudes, and perceptions during collaborative earth science field-based experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
10. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association fot Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
13. Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematics and Science Education. (1999). Ideas that work: Mathematics professional development. Columbus, OH: Author
14. Goodlad, J. (1994). Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Govindarajan, G. (1993). Analysis of preservice elementary school teachers' collaborative problem solving in a constructivist-based interdisciplinary science course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
16. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
18. Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI: Author.
19. Holmes Group. (1995). Tomorrow's schools of education. East Lansing, MI: Author.
20. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
21. Kansas State Board of Education. (2002). Certification and teacher education regulations and teaching standards for Kansas certification and teacher education. Topeka, KS: Author.
22. The Mathematical Association of America. (1991). A call for change: Recommendations for the mathematical preparation of teachers of mathematics. Washington, DC: Author
23. Merrian, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1999). What teachers should know and be able to do. Arlington, VA: Author.
26. National Center for Improving Science Education. (1989). Science and technology education for the elementary years: Frameworks for curriculum and instruction. Andover, WA: The Network.
27. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.
28. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1998). Teaching for high standards: What policymakers need to know and be able to do. New York: Author.
29. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001). Standards for professional development schools. Washington, DC: Author.
30. National Council for the Social Studies. (1998). NCSS standards for social studies teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
31. National Council of Teachers of English and International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Newark, DE: NCTE.
32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
34. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
35. National Research Council. (1988). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. National Research Council. (1996). National science standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. National Science Teachers' Association. (1988). Science education initiatives for the 1990s. Washington, DC: Author.
39. Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, G., & Staver, J. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80, 283-315.
40. Shroyer, M. G., Ramey-Gassert, L., Hancock, M., Moore, P., & Walker, M. (1995). Math, science, technology after-school clubs and summer magnet school: Collaborative professional development opportunities for science educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6, 112-119.
41. Shroyer, M. G., & Wright, E. L. (1995, April). Expertise in preservice elementary teaching in science, mathematics, and technology: Evaluation of an innovative model. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.
42. Shroyer, M. G., & Wright, E. L. (1998, April). A longitudinal case study of organizational change. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Diego, CA.
43. Shroyer, M. G., Wright, E. L., & Ramey-Gassert, L (1996). An innovative model for collaborative reform in elementary school science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7, 151-168.
44. Stalheim-Smith, A., & Scharmann, L. C. (1994). General biology: Creating a positive learning environment for elementary education majors. The American Biology Teacher, 56, 216-220.
45. Teitel, L. (2001). How professional development schools make a difference: A review of research. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
46. U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Promising practices: New ways to improve teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
48. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Before it's too late: A report to the nation from The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Education Publications Center.
49. West Ed. (2000). Teachers who learn, kids who achieve: A look at schools with model professional development. San Francisco: Author.
50. Willhite, K. T. (1995). Changes in elementary science teachers during their participation in a science, mathematics and technology teacher preparation project. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
51. Wilson, J. (1996). An evaluation of the field experiences of the innovative model for the preparation of elementary school teachers for science, mathematics, and technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 53-59.
52. Zollman, D. (1994). Preparing future science teachers. Physics Education, 29, 271-275.