Reflections on the social learning process for community work in rural areas of Mexico

International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 31-45

  Del Amo Rodríguez, Silvia ^a   Vergara Tenorio, María Del Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD VERACRUZANA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Mexico; Natural resource management; Social learning; Tropical forest

Indexed keywords

LEARNING; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RURAL AREA; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL WORK; TROPICAL FOREST;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 34247225965     PISSN: 17451590     EISSN: 17451604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17451590709618160     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Acosta-Barradas R. La sustentabilidad y los problemas fundamentales del desarrollo en México. In Pablo A. Torres-Lima (Coord), Desarrollo regional y sustentabilidad en México. Mexico: El Colegio de Sonora; 2005
2. Agrawal A and Gibson CC. The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. In Agrawal A and Gibson CC (eds), Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender and the State in Community-Based Conservation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2001
3. Aguilar A, Rosas A and Frausto JM. El cultivo de la palma Camedor (Chamaedora elegans) una alternativa para el manejo de acahuales en Uxpanapa, Veracruz. In del Amo Rodríguez S (Coord), Lecciones del programa de Acción Forestal Tropical. Mexico: SEMARNAT, PROAFT A.C., CNEB y Editorial Plaza y Valdés; 2001
4. Alcorn J. Indigenous People and Conservation. Conservation Biology 1997;7:424-6
5. Amo Rodríguez S del, Yllescas P and Medellín S. Programa de Acompañamiento social. Rejuvenecimiento de las capacidades locales con base en el uso de los recursos naturales. In del Amo Rodríguez S (Coord), Lecciones del programa de Acción Forestal Tropical. Mexico: SEMARNAT, PROAFT A.C., CNEB y Editorial Plaza y Valdés; 2001
6. Amo Rodríguez S del and Yllescas P. Las mujeres, los recursos y el bienestar: desarrollando una metodología de trabajo con las mujeres de trabajo con las mujeres del sureste. In Ochoa-Gaona GS and Chiappy C (eds), Etnopaisaje, Trabajo comunitario y Manejo y Conservación de recursos naturales. Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, CONACYT and Colegio de la Frontera Sur. Tabasco; 2004
7. Amo Rodríguez S del and Yllescas P. Forjando las sustentabilidad social desde la autoestima al empoderamiento de las mujeres rurales. In Tuñon Pablos E, Género y Educación. Mexico: Colegio de la Frontera Sur and Consejo Estatal de Población de Chiapas; 2005
8. Amo Rodríguez S del and Rorive V. The Tropical Forest Action Program: A different way to handle the Management and Conservation of natural Resources. In Gómez-Pompa A, Allen MF, Fedick SL and Jimenez-Osornio JJ (eds), The Lowland Maya Area. Three Millennia at the Human-Wildland Interface. New York Foods Products Press; 2004
9. Amo Rodríguez S del. Lecciones del Programa de Acción Forestal Tropical. México: D.F., PROAFT, A.C. Semarnat, CNEB, Plaza y Valdés Editores; 2001
10. Anderson J, Clément J and Van Crowder L. Conciliar los Intereses Contrapuestos de la Actividad Forestal: Nuevos Conceptos en el Marco del Pluralismo. Unasylva 1998;49(3):3-18
11. Aramoni-Calderón D. Los refugiados de lo sagrado: religiosidad, conflicto y resistencia entre los zoques de Chiapas. México: CONACULTA, Boletín;1992
12. Bandura A. Self-efficiency in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997
13. Berkes F and Folke C. Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In Berkes F and Folke C (eds), Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000:1-25
14. Berkes F. Traditional ecological knowledge in perspective. In Inglis Otawa T, Traditional knowledge concepts and cases. Canada: Canadian Museum of Nature and International Development Research Centre; 1993
15. Berkes F. Rethinking Community-Based. Conservation Biology 2004;18(3)621-30
16. Bonfil-Batalla G. México Profundo. Una Civilización Negada. México: Grijalbo; 1987
17. Brechin SR, Peter R, Wilshusen R, Fortwangler CL and West PC. Beyond the square wheel: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society and Natural Resources 2002;15(1):41-64
18. Briassoulis H. Theoretical Orientations in environmental planning: An inquiry in alternative approaches. Environmental Management 1989; 13(4):381-92
19. Campbell J. Participatory Rural Appraisal as Qualitative research: Distinguishing Methodological Issues from Participatory Claims. Human Organization 2001;60 (4):380-9
20. Carlsson L and Berkes F. Co-management: Concepts and Methodological Implications. Journal of Environmental Management 2005(75):65-76
21. Danielsen F, Burgess ND and Balmford A. Monitoring matters: Examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 2005; 4(11):2507-42
22. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Ley del Desarrollo Rural Sustentable. México; 2001:134
23. Edmunds D and Wollenberg E. Whose devolution is it anyway? Divergent Constructs Interests and Capacities between the Poorest Forest Users and States. In Edmunds D and Wollenberg E (eds), Local Forest Management: The Impacts of Devolution Policies. London: Earthscan; 2003
24. Engel P and Salomon M. Cognition, development and governance. Some Lessons from Knowledge systems research and Practice. In Leeuwis C and Pyburn R (eds), Wheelbarrows full of frogs. Social Learning in Rural Resource Management. Netherlands: Assen; 2002
25. Esteva G, Consejo JJ, Kurlatt K, Toledo V, Barking D and Robin J. La construcción social de una percepción alternativa de las áreas tropicales de México. Estudio de Diagnóstico. Programa de Acción Forestal Tropical, A.C.; 1994:248 pp.
26. García R. Conceptos Básicos para el Estudio de Sistemas Complejos. In Leff E (ed.), Los Problemas del Conocimiento y la Perspectiva Ambiental del Desarrollo. México: Siglo XXI, 1986
27. Gallardo-Latapí A. México: la pobreza vista desde una perspectiva política y analítica. In Gallardo-Gómez LR, Osorio-Goicoechea J and Gendreau M (eds), Los rostros de la pobreza. El debate Tomo III. México: Limunsa and Noriega; 2001
28. Gerth HH and Mills W. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford: University Press; 1946
29. Gómezjara F. Metodología participativa para el desarrollo comunitario. Una propuesta de organización social alternativa e instrumento para la acción. Estudio de Diagnóstico PAFT-México/Proaft. México. Documento interno; 2002
30. Gómez-Pompa A and Kaus A. Taming the Wilderness Myth: Environmental Policy and Education are currently based on Western Beliefs about Nature rather on Reality. Bioscience 1992;42(4):271-9
31. González-Jamome A. Cultura y Agricultural: Transformaciones en el Agro Mexicano. México: Universidad Iberoamericana; 2003
32. Hays-Mitchell M. Resisting austerity: a gendered perspective on neo-liberal restructuring Peru. Gender and Development 2002;10(3):71-81
33. Holling CS, Gunderson LH and Ludwing D. In Quest of Theory and Adaptive Change. In Gunderson LH and Holling CS (eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press; 2002
34. Kimmerer W. Native Knowledge for Native Ecosystems. Journal of Forestry 2000;98(8):4-9
35. Larson MJ. Transforming power relationships: Building capacity for ecological security. Gender and Development 2002;10(2):92-101
36. Lee KN. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington: Island Press; 1993
37. Leeuwis C and Pyburn R. Social Learning for Rural Resource Management. In Leeuwis C and Pyburn R (eds), Wheelbarrows full of frogs. Social Learning in Rural Resource Management Netherlands: Assen; 2002
38. Lenkersdorf C. Los Hombres Verdaderos, Voces y Testimonios Tojolabales. Lengua y Sociedad, naturaleza y cutiura, antes y comunidad cosmica. Mexico: Siglo XXI; 1996
39. Lomnitz LA de. Networks and Marginality: Life in a Mexican Shantytown. New York: Academic Press; 1977
40. López-Arzola R and López E. Educando para la vida comunitaria con alumnos de 4, 5, 6 grado de primaria. Programa de educación complementaria. México:Asesoría técnica a Comunidades Oaxaqueñas y Consejo national para la Enseñanza de la Biología; 1999
41. Mogina J and Bourke RM. Traditional Management of Food Production and Implications for National Food Security and Self-sufficiency in Papua New Guinea. Abstracts of the Conference Bridging Scales and Epistemologies. Linking Local Knowledge with Global Science and Multi-Scale Assessment. March 17-20. Alexandria, Egypt: Bibliotheca; 2004
42. Mohanty CT, Russo A and Torres L. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Indiana: Indiana University Press; 1991
43. Morales-Torres J and del Amo Rodríguez S. Programa de reforzamiento cultural. Ser, saber, decir. La expresión de las comunidades en los procesos de interacción para la conservación y el manejo de los recursos naturales y su vínculo con el bienestar. In del Amo Rodríguez S (Coord), Lecciones del programa de Acción Forestal Tropical. Mexico: SEMARNAT, PROAFT A.C., CNEB y Editorial Plaza y Valdés; 2001
44. Natcher D and Hickey C. Putting the Community Back Into Community-Based Resource Management: A Criteria and Indicators Approach to Sustainability. Human Organization 2002;61(4):350-63
45. Nayar JR and Ong DM. Developing Countries, development and conservation of biodiversity. In Redgwell C and Bowman M (eds), International Law and the Conservation of Biological Biodiversity. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995: 235-53
46. Nerbonne JF and Lentz R. Rooted in grass: Challenging patterns of knowledge exchange as a means of fostering social change in a southeast Minnesota farm community. Agriculture and Human Values 2003;20:65-78
47. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990
48. Ostrom E. Community and the Endogenous Solution of the Commons Problems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1992:4(3)343-51
49. Palsson G. Learning by fishing: practical engagement and environmental concerns. In Berkes F and Folke C (eds), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management, practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000
50. Pieck-Goicochea E. Función Socialy Significado de la Educación Comunitaria. México, Colegio Mexiquense: UNICEF; 1996
51. Preetty J and Smith D. Social capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management. Conservation Biology 2004;18(3):631-8
52. Rivera F. Expulsiones en localidades indígenas de Los Altos de Chiapas, (inédito). San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas; 2002
53. Rolling N and Wagemakers AE. A new Practice: facili tating sustainable agriculture. In: Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture. Participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000:3-22
54. Rolling N and Jiggins J. Extension studies: An ugly duckling exploration in reflexive praxiology. Key note speech delivered at the Fifteenth European Seminar of Extension and Education Health. Wageningen; 2001
55. Rorive V. The role of environmental education in an agroforestry project: A case study in Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. MA Thesis, California State University; 2006
56. Rubin JH and Rubin IS. Community Organizing and Development. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2001
57. Sharp JS. Locating the Community Field: A Study on interorganizational Network Structure and Capacity for Community Action. Rural Sociology 2001; 66(3):403-24
58. Shirur RR. Non Formal Education for Development. New Delhi: APH Publication; 1995
59. Steil JM. Supermoms and Second Shifts: Marital Inequality in the 1990s. In Women: a Feminist Perspective. 5th Ed. California: J. Freeman, Mayfield; 1995
60. Torres-Lima P, Rodríguez L and Sánchez O. Evaluación de la Sustentabilidad del Desarrollo Regional. El Marco de la Agricultura. In Torres-Lima P (coord), Desarrollo Regional y Sustentablididad en México. Sonora: UAM y El Colegio de Sonora; 2005
61. Trolle A, Rosas A, Martínez MH, López RM and Pascual F. Etnoedafología traditional: la clasificación de los suelos por los nahuas y zoque popolucas. Sociedades Rurales, Producción y Medio Ambiente 2002(3)1:75-85
62. Van Wijk C and García M. Having it both ways. Local Participatory Learning Informing Global Policy and Programme Management. In Leeuwis C and Pyburn R (eds), Wheelbarrows full of frogs. Social Learning in Rural Resource Management. Netherlands: Assen; 2002
63. Wellman B and Wortley S. Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology 1990;96(3):558-88
64. Wilkinson KP. The Community in Rural America. New York: Greenwood; 1991:63 pp.
65. Wilkinson KP. The Community as a Social Field. Social Forces 1970;48(3):311-22