Mid-Term Comparison of Bifurcated Modular Endograft Versus Aorto-Uni-Iliac Endograft in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 339-345

  Dalainas, Ilias ^a   Moros, Ioannis ^a   Gerasimidis, Thomas ^a   Papadimitriou, Dimitris ^a   Saratzis, Nikos ^a   Gitas, Christos G ^a   Kiskinis, Dimitrios ^a   Lazaridis, Jean ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTO UNI ILIAC ENDOGRAFT; ARTICLE; BIFURCATED ENDOGRAFT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT COURSE THERAPY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREECE; HUMANS; ILIAC ANEURYSM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; STENTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34247225934     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Saratzis N., Melas N., Lazaridis J., et al. Endovascular AAA repair with the aortomonoiliac EndoFit stent-graft: two years' experience. J Endovasc Ther 12 (2005) 280-287
2. Greenberg R.K., Lawrence-Brown M., Bhandari G., et al. An update of the Zenith endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm: initial implantation and mid-term follow-up data. J Vasc Surg 33 (2001) S157-S164
3. Mialhe C., Amicabile C., and Becquemin J.P. Endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms by the Stentor system: preliminary results of 79 cases. J Vasc Surg 26 (1997) 199-209
4. Buth J., Laheij R.J.F., and on behalf of the EUROSTAR Collaborators. Early complications and endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: report of a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 31 (2000) 134-147
5. Moore W.S., and for the EVT Investigators. The EVT tube and bifurcated endograft systems: technical considerations and clinical summary. J Endovasc Surg 4 (1997) 182-194
6. Umscheid T., and Stelter W.J. Time-related alterations of shape, position, and structure in self-expanding modular aortic stent-grafts. J Endovasc Surg 6 (1999) 17-32
7. Zarins C.K., White R.A., Moll F.L., et al. The AneuRx stent graft: four-year results and worldwide experience 2000. J Vasc Surg 33 (2001) S135-S145
8. Faries P.L., Brener B.J., Connelly T.L., et al. A multicenter experience with the Talent endovascular graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 35 (2002) 1123-1128
9. Harris P., Brennan J., Martin J., et al. Longitudinal aneurysm shrinkage following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a source of intermediate and late complications. J Endovasc Surg 6 (1999) 11-16
10. Leurs L.J., Hobo R., and Buth J. The multicenter experience with a third-generation endovascular device for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. A report from the EUROSTAR database. J Cardiovasc Surg 45 (2004) 293-300
11. Dalainas I., Nano G., Casana R., et al. Mid-term results after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a four-year experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27 (2004) 319-323
12. May J., White G.H., Yu W., et al. Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: strengths and weaknesses of various prostheses observed in a 4.5-year experience. J Endovasc Surg 4 (1997) 147-151
13. Resch T., Malina M., Lindblad B., et al. The impact of stent-graft development on outcome of AAA repair-a 7-year experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22 (2001) 57-61
14. Ouriel K., Clair D.G., Greenberg R.K., et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: device-specific outcome. J Vasc Surg 37 (2003) 991-998
15. Greenberg R.K., Deaton D., Sullivan T., et al. Variable sac behavior after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of core laboratory data. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 95-101
16. Sternbergh W.C., Conners M.S., Tonnessen B.H., et al. Aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular repair is device-dependent: a comparison of Zenith and AneuRx endografts. Ann Vasc Surg 17 (2003) 49-53
17. Carroccio A., Faries P.L., Morrissey N.J., et al. Predicting iliac limb occlusions after bifurcated aortic stent grafting: anatomic and devicerelated causes. J Vasc Surg 36 (2002) 679-684
18. Nevelsteen A., and Maleux G. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment: device-specific outcomes. J Cardiovasc Surg 45 (2004) 307-319
19. van Marrewijk J.C., Leurs J.L., Vallabhaneni R.S., et al. Risk-Adjusted outcome analysis of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a large population: how do stent-grafts compare?. J Endovasc Ther 12 (2005) 417-429
20. Piotrowski J.J., Pearce W.H., Jones D.N., et al. Aortobifemoral bypass: the operation of choice for unilateral iliac occlusion?. J Vasc Surg 8 (1988) 211-218
21. Lamerton A.J., Nicolaides A.N., and Eastcott H.H. The femorofemoral graft: hemodynamic improvement and patency rate. Arch Surg 120 (1985) 1274-1278
22. Plecha F.T., and Plecha F.M. Femorofemoral bypass grafts: ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg 1 (1984) 555-561
23. Flanigan D.P., Pratt D.G., Goodreau J.J., et al. Hemodynamic and angiographic guidelines in selection of patients for femorofemoral bypass. Arch Surg 113 (1978) 1257-1262
24. Eugene J., Goldstone J., and Moore W.S. Fifteen year experience with subcutaneous bypass grafts for lower extremity ischemia. Ann Surg 186 (1977) 177-183
25. Brief D.K., and Brener B.J. Extra-anatomic bypasses: femorofemoral crossover grafts. In: Wilson S.E., Veith F.J., Hobson R.W., et al. (Eds). Vascular Surgery: Principles and Practice (1987), McGraw-Hill, New York 415-418
26. Dick L.S., Brief D.K., Alpert J., et al. 12-year experience with femorofemoral crossover grafts. Arch. Surg 115 (1980) 1359-1365
27. Mosley J.G., and Marston A. Long term results of 66 femorofemoral bypass grafts: 9-year follow-up. Br J Surg 70 (1983) 631-634
28. Maini B.S., and Mannick J.A. Effect of arterial reconstruction on limb salvage: a ten-year appraisal. Arch Surg 113 (1978) 1297-1304
29. Criado E., Burnham S.J., Tinsley E.A., et al. Femorofemoral bypass grafts: analysis of patency and factors influencing long term outcome. J Vasc Surg 18 (1993) 495-505
30. Mingoli A., Sapienza P., Feldhaus R.J., et al. Femorofemoral bypass grafts: factors influencing long term patency rate and outcome. Surgery 129 (2001) 451-458
31. Nano G., Serrao G., Bianchi P., et al. Intentional covering of the hypogastric artery during endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms. Ital J Vasc Endovasc Surg 12 (2005) 55-60
32. Boks S.S., Andhyiswara T., de Smet A.A., et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transabdominal treatment of a type 2 endoleak. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28 (2005) 526-529
33. Ferrari M., Sardella S.G., Berchiolli R., et al. Surgical treatment of persistent type 2 endoleaks, with increase of the aneurysm sac: indications and technical notes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29 (2005) 43-46