Endovascular AAA repair with the aortomonoiliac EndoFit stent-graft: Two years' experience

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 280-287

  Saratzis, Nikolaos ^a   Melas, Nikolaos ^a   Lazaridis, John ^a   Ginis, George ^a   Antonitsis, Polychronis ^a   Lykopoulos, Dimitrios ^a   Lioupis, Athanasios ^a   Gitas, Christos ^a   Kiskinis, Dimitrios ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Aortomonoiliac endograft; Endovascular repair; Femoropopliteal bypass; Outcome analysis; Stent graft

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; AORTA GRAFT; ARTERY BYPASS; ARTERY EMBOLISM; ARTERY THROMBOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; MALE; PARAPLEGIA; PATIENT CODING; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOSCOPY; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 20444479059     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/04-1474.1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, et al. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843-848.
2. Prinssen M, Verhoeven ELG, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607-1618.
3. Chuter TA, Reilly LM, Faruqi RM, et al. Endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:122-133.
4. Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Barker CF, et al. Durability of benefits of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:222-228.
5. Faries PL, Brener BJ, Connelly TL, et al. A multicenter experience with the Talent endovascular graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1123-1128.
6. Lee AW, Carter JW, Upchurch G, et al. Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:491-496.
7. Brewster DC, Cronenwett JL, Hallett JW, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:1106-1117.
8. Rutherford RB, Krupski WC. Current status of open versus endovascular stent-graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1129-1139.
9. AbuRahma AF, Stone PA, Bates MC, et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using 3 commercially available devices: midterm results. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:641-648.
10. Moore WS, Kashyap VS, Vescera CL, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair. Ann Surg. 1999;230:298-308.
11. Zarins CK, White RA, Moll FL, et al. The AneuRx stent graft: four-year results and worldwide experience 2000. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:5135-145.
12. Dattilo JB, Brewster DC, Fan CM, et al. Clinical failures of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: incidence, causes, and management. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1137-1144.
13. Clouse WD, Brewster DC, Marone LK, et al. Durability of aortouniiliac endografting with femorofemoral crossover. 4-year experience in the EVT/Guidant trials. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:1142-1149.
14. Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, et al. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:739-749.
15. Hölzenbein TJ, Kretschmer G, Thurnher S, et al. Midterm durability of abdominal aortic aneurysm endograft repair: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S46-54.
16. Zarins CK, White RA, Fogarty TJ. Aneurysm rupture after endovascular repair using the AneuRx stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:960-970.
17. Ohki T, Veith FJ, Shaw P, et al. Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experience. Ann Surg. 2001;234:323-335.
18. Bernhard VM, Mitchell RS, Matsumura JS, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1155-1162.
19. Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Barker CF, et al. Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:1050-1054.
20. Arko FR, Filis KA, Seidel SA, et al. How many patients with infrarenal aneurysms are candidates for endovascular repair? The Northern California experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:33-40.
21. May J, White G, Waugh R, et al. Treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms by a combination of endoluminal and extraluminal aortofemoral grafts. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:924-933.
22. Parodi JC, Palrnaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491-499.
23. Chuter TA, Faruqi RM, Reilly LM. Aortomonoiliac endovascular grafting combined with femorofemoral bypass: an acceptable compromise or a preferred solution? Semin Vasc Surg. 1999;12:176-181.
24. Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, Chuter TA, et al. Early results of endovascular aortic aneurysm surgery with aortouniiliac graft, contralateral iliac occlusion, and femorofemoral bypass. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:165-172.
25. Thompson MM, Sayers RD, Nasim A, et al. Aortomonoiliac endovascular grafting: difficult solutions to difficult aneurysms. J Endovasc Surg. 1997;4:174-181.
26. Rehring TF, Brewster DC, Cambria RP, et al. Utility and reliability of endovascular aortomonoiliac with femorofemoral crossover graft for aortoiliac aneurysmal disease. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:1135-1141.
27. Moore WS, Brewster DC, Bernhard VM. Aortouni-iliac endograft for complex aortoiliac aneurysms compared with tube/bifurcation endografts: Results of the EVT/Guidant trials. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:S11-20.
28. Piotrowski JJ, Pearce WH, Jones DN, et al. Aortobifemoral bypass: the operation of choice for unilateral iliac occlusion? J Vasc Surg. 1988;8:211-218.
29. Lamerton AJ, Nicolaides AN, Eastcott HH. The femorofemoral graft: hemodynamic improvement and patency rate. Arch Surg. 1985;120:1274-1278.
30. Plecha FT, Plecha FM. Femorofemoral bypass grafts: ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg. 1984;1:555-561.
31. Flanigan DP, Pratt DG, Goodreau JJ, et al. Hemodynamic and angiographic guidelines in selection of patients for femorofemoral bypass. Arch Surg. 1978;113:1257-1262.
32. Eugene J, Goldstone J, Moore WS. Fifteen year experience with subcutaneous bypass grafts for lower extremity ischemia. Ann Surg. 1977;186:177-183.
33. Brief DK, Brener BJ. Extra-anatomic bypasses: Femorofemoral crossover grafts. In: Wilson SE, Veith FJ, Hobson RW, et al., eds. Vascular Surgery: Principles and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1987:415-418.
34. Dick LS, Brief DK, Alpert J, et al. 12-year experience with femorofemoral crossover grafts. Arch Surg. 1980;115:1359-1365.
35. Mosley JG, Marston A. Long term results of 66 femorofemoral bypass grafts: 9-year follow-up. Br J Surg. 1983;70:631-634.
36. Maini BS, Mannick JA. Effect of arterial reconstruction on limb salvage: a ten-year appraisal. Arch Surg. 1978;113:1297-1304.
37. Criado E, Burnham SJ, Tinsley EA, et al. Femorofemoral bypass grafts: analysis of patency and factors influencing long term outcome. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:495-505.
38. Mingoli A, Sapienza P, Feldhaus RJ, et al. Femorofemoral bypass grafts: factors influencing long term patency rate and outcome. Surgery. 2001;129:451-458.
39. Komori K, Okadome K, Funahashi S, et al. Correlation of long-term results of extra-anatomic bypass and flow wave-form analysis. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993;7:479-482.
40. Thompson-Fawcett M, Moon M, Hands L, et al. The significance of donor leg distal runoff in femorofemoral bypass grafting. Aust NZ J Surg. 1998;68:493-497.
41. Farber MA, Hollier LH, Eubanks R, et al. Femorofemoral bypass: a profile of graft failure. South Med J. 1990;83:1437-1443.
42. Schneider JR, Besso SR, Walsh DB, et al. Femorofemoral versus aortobifemoral bypass: outcome and hemodynamic results. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:43-57.
43. Self SB, Richardson JD, Klamer TW, et al. Utility of femorofemoral bypass. Comparison of results with indications for operations. Am Surg. 1991;57:602-606.
44. Hinchliffe RJ, Alric P, Wenham PW, et al. Durability of femorofemoral bypass grafting after aortouniiliac endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:498-503.
45. Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Veith FJ, et al. Patency rates of femorofemoral bypasses associated with endovascular aneurysm repair surpass those performed for occlusive disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:1061-1065.
46. Yilmaz LP, Abraham CZ, Reilly LM, et al. Is cross-femoral bypass grafting a disadvantage of aortomonoiliac endovascular aortic aneurysm repair? J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:753-757.
47. Walker SR, Braithwaite B, Tennant WG, et al. Early complications of femorofemoral crossover bypass grafts after aorta uni-iliac endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:647-650.